The Clooneys. “Humanitarians”. “Human rights activists”. In today’s vernacular, these terms are Newspeak. Newspeak is the term coined by George Orwell that “meet(s) the ideological requirements of English Socialism. Newspeak is a controlled language, of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, free will—that ideologically threatens the régime of Big Brother and the Party, who thus criminalized such concepts as thoughtcrime”. The “Big Brothers” here are the “global elite” who, for the past several decades, have attempted to install a worldwide socialist governing body via the UN. To do this, they needed a plan to eliminate national sovereignty while collecting the world’s wealth which became the “refugee” and “climate” crises perpetuate by continual war. The Clooneys “humanitarian” and human rights” initiatives are all covers for this plan.
There are nothing “humanitarian” or “human rights” oriented about the Clooneys As democrats do, they project onto their enemies that of which they are guilty reinforcing that message through their various pop culture platforms while behind the scenes partaking in these actions in direct violation of their public stance all to advance their goal of a one socialist government ruled planet. How the plan works:
- use satellite technology to pinpoint locations on the planet where rich minerals and natural resources are in bountiful supply
- create an incident that gives the illusion of or exacerbates the “human rights violations” occurring, claim“regime change” as the only option
- “UN backed forces” enter to topple the dictator and instill a puppet, strip the land of resources, and leave behind a shithole
- claim the west is evil for raping third world countries of its resources and demand the western nations open their borders due to the “refugee crisis” they actually helped create
- take on the “humanitarian” mission of trafficking these people (especially children) all over the world and “educate” them as they see fit…
- as these “refugees” refuse to assimilate causing a disturbance in the western nations that will eventually create a “humanitarian” situation that requires UN “intervention”in the western nations…
Repeat the cycle until all borders are erased, and the UN is in charge. This is why we now have “climate refugees”. From George’s The Sentry and Satellite Sentinel projects to 9/11, Iraq and Libya to South Sudan and Syria to their position as figureheads to Obama’s UN Refugee Resettlement Program and the Prince’s Trust to their “education” initiatives with the Catholic Church, George and Amal Clooney are everything about which Orwell and Joe McCarthy tried to warn us. The Clooneys are enemies of democracy.
The Responsibility to Protect
The same people and money behind the perpetual war to keep the Clooney cycle of humanitarian fraud in motion are “allowed” to do so based on a UN doctrine called the “Responsibility to Protect”. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) was adopted by a UN World Summit in September of 2005. The first country-specific resolution to which this doctrine was referred by the UN was Darfur in 2006 led publicly by “human rights” activist George Clooney. According to “George Clooney’s War: The Filmstar’s Activism in Sudan”, “A UN World Summit in 2005 adopted humanitarian intervention – the ‘Responsibility to Protect’, or R2P – as official UN doctrine. R2P enshrined in international law both the reason and duty for humanitarian intervention. A nation would henceforth forfeit its sovereignty if it committed or was unable to prevent massive human rights abuses on its soil. In such circumstances, the outside world could, and must, take action to stem the disaster through diplomacy, sanctions or, if needed, military force.” The “R2P” calls for the use of a global police force as needed as determined by the UN. To clarify the current legal status of a particular aspect of the “Responsibility to Protect” principle—“the idea that bystander states have a collective responsibility to protect populations beyond borders from mass atrocities when host states fail to do so. It outlines the development of this idea and argues that, while the legal force of key international statements on the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ principle may be weak at best, the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission have offered bold declarations in recent years which do point towards the gradual development of legal duties for the extraterritorial protection of populations.” In effect, if the UN does not like the way a country is being run (or if it determines there are minerals in there worthy of pursuing), it can claim it has a “responsibility to protect” it’s citizens from themselves and their government by suspending its “sovereignty/borders and implementing regime change. “Sovereignty”, “democracy”, “human rights”….this is Newspeak language manipulation to appeal to the emotion of low informed voters to justify their wrongdoings.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ)/Criminal Court (ICC)
The International Court of “Justice” leads to the International Criminal Court. This is where the deposed “human rights violators” are tried by the same people who deposed the leader Can there be a “fair” trial with this seemingly implicit bias? Regardless, the Newspeak of the term “war crimes” then becomes problematic. It has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, for politically motivated prosecutions. Consider the politicization of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UMHRC), which was established on March 15, 2006 to replace the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) because it had come under attack for allowing countries with poor human rights records to be members. Changing the name did not fix the problem The problem has only gotten worse. Consider these members: Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, China, Cuba, Iraq, Burundi, UAE, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Angola, Cuba…the council is made up of some of the worst violators of human rights in the world. Talk about projection. These countries are in charge of prosecuting “war crimes” in the ICC?
Right now Israeli is in the crosshairs for “anti-terror” operations in the Gaza Strip. Who was asked to serve on one of those panels in 2014? Amal Clooney, whose job is to present cases before the ICC, was asked to serve on a panel to investigate Israel’s supposed “war crimes” in Gaza. She agreed at first but then abruptly pulled out just before their wedding in September of 2014. The UN assault on Israel has not gotten better, only worse. Amal has the ICC, and George Clooney’s Darfur was the beta test for the R2P. The Responsibility to Protect becomes a cornerstone of almost every “humanitarian” event with which they connect themselves. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops. As we watch the UK Labour and US Democrat parties take hard turns left against nationalism and anti-semitism, we can see where this fear is just.
Australian Evans has been widely acknowledged as playing a crucial role in “initiating, and advocating the international acceptance of, the concept (of the Responsibility to Protect), first as Co-Chair of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty which introduced the expression in its 2001 report of that name, and subsequently as a member of the UN Secretary-General’s High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, Co-Chair of the Advisory Board of the Global Centre on the Responsibility to Protect”. He was also President and CEO of the Brussels based International Crisis Group from 2000-2009. He is now President Emeritus of the ICG and a member of the selection committee of Clooney’s Aurora Prize “100 Lives”.
George Soros/Center for American “Progress”
György Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary. Soros’ father, Tivadar, was an expert in Esperanto—a language invented in 1887 designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartzs, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros in order to facilitate their assimilation into the Gentile population as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930’s. When Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary to oversee the Holocaust of its Jews, George Soros ended up going on rounds with a man whose job was to confiscate property from the Jewish population. Soros has repeatedly called 1944, the year “70% of Mr. Soros’ fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings were killed the ‘best year of (his) life’”. Indeed the seeds for Soros’ sociopathic tendencies towards hatred of nationalism-especially where “free” nations like Israel and the United States are concerned-seem to have been sown during these formative years.
The anti-nationalism seeds acquired by Soros during World War II continued thereafter when he attended the London School of Economics, where one of his professors was fellow atheist and Hungarian Karl Popper. Two of Popper’s most influential teachings concerned “the open society,” which refers to a “test and evaluate” approach to social engineering. Regarding this “open society”, Roy Childs writes, “Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper’s advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, and it has gotten them into a grand mess”. This is especially true in Europe where these societies are currently collapsing, giving rise to the current nationalist and populist trends destroying the globalist utopian in lieu of stronger sovereign protections.
In 1956, Soros moved to New York City where he worked on Wall Street and started amassing his billion dollar fortune as a hedge fund operator. Soros was absolutely ruthless, amoral, and clever in his business dealings that quickly made him a fortune. His financial manipulations via “vulture capitalism”, not “free market capitalism”, affect the fates of nations, their currencies, and their citizens. One especially egregious example of his predatory speculation activities earned him the nickname “the man who broke the Bank of England”. Kyle-Anne Shiver of The American Thinker said, “Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England. He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically…almost overnight.” This is not the only time he has done this, but it was the first time he did it to a major western nation.
Even though Soros is usually referred to by the liberal media as a “financier” or “philanthropist”, what Soros actually does is criminal and inhumane. He influences the balkanization of areas of the world ripe for the picking identified through his late brother Paul’s satellite company DigitalGlobal. Then he causes their collapse through market manipulation via his off-shore hedge fund, Quantum Funds before “saving” the people from the crisis that he helped create as a “human rights issue” via some sort of UN “humanitarian” intervention. Soros and his ilk have commandeered the use of the term “human rights” to facilitate the falls of Eastern Europe and Africa first, followed by Western Europe and now North America. It is all part of his “social engineering” plan for an “open borders” society to be carried out by the UN. As Anne Bayefsky, of National Review, stated:
“Soros, logged as one of President Obama’s frequent White House guests, appreciates that a human-rights mantra, particularly when amplified with the U.N.’s global megaphone, is a formidable tool for manipulating public policy. A tool, mind you, and not a principle… He has brought together the unelected, unaccountable NGO claiming to represent ‘civil society’, the Democratic party and its sitting president, and the world’s chief global organization, each supportive of the others in a plethora of financial and personal interrelationships, and all sharing common goals: diminishing American power and mothballing the idea of unadulterated universal values… Soros’s view is the antithesis of human-rights protection. It directly contradicts the vision of common, inviolable rights and freedoms, which the visionaries who founded America, the United Nations, and Human Rights Watch understood.”
The Newspeak meanings of the terms “human rights” and “humanitarian” is perhaps the most disgusting outcome of this method of operation. The poor masses Soros and his minions claim to want to help are nothing more than a means to an end of increasing their own wealth and power as the poor get poorer and their living conditions worsen. People cannot be ruled if they are free and prosperous. They can be ruled when they are desperate and needy. In their world, the “human rights” allowed to the masses are only the ones the elites allow them to have and “humanitarian” infers only the elites can save them via the transfer of the world’s wealth and power to them.
Thus the 1990’s saw Soros increase his global hold on economics and politics. In 1997, Soros continued this destruction with the economies of Thailand and Malaysia. At the time, Malaysia’s Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, called Soros “a villain, and a moron.” Thai activist Weng Tojirakarn said, “We regard George Soros as a kind of Dracula. He sucks the blood from the people.” Soros was also involved in the Balkanization of the former Yugoslavia. Coincidentally, Amal Clooney participated in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The website Greek National Pride reported, “[Soros] was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia and caused trouble in Georgia, Ukraine and Myanmar [Burma]. Calling himself a philanthropist, Soros’ role is to tighten the ideological stranglehold of globalization and the New World Order while promoting his own financial gain. He is without conscience; a (vulture) capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.” Side note: Amal Clooney was called upon to ‘represent” Yulia Tymoshenko in Ukraine and two random “journalists” in Burma.
At one point, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for “illegal market manipulation.” Elizabeth Crum writes that “The Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and Westernized. [Soros’] deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary’s economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.” The recent push for “open borders” via the “migrant crisis” as the means by which the elites are attempting to erase borders and use radical Islam and “xenophobia” to eliminate Christianity has Soros facing off with Hungary’s current “right wing” leader Viktor Orban. Orban declared it would build a Trump-like wall to stop the “Soros invasion”. By December of 2018, the “extreme right wing” Orban government had forced “philanthropist” Soros to close his “accredited” university the Central European University (CEU), established in 1991 after the fall of the Soviet Union. According to the mission statement on its website, one of its aims is to be “a source of support for building open and democratic societies that respect human rights and human dignity.” Lots of Newspeak used here to garner sympathy for the great “human rights” “philanthropist”. As the Newspeak is uncovered and more nation’s take this stance, Soros and the New World Order lose power…and their collective minds.
One area Soros has not been able to control is Russia. In 1994 Soros triumphantly declared himself the world’s top communist when he stated in The New Republic that, “The former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire.” The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, engineered by Soros much in the same way he did with England, Thailand, Malaysia, and Hungary, almost collapsed the Russian economy. Concerns over Russian currency devaluation ramped up when Soros “urged Russian economic leaders to devalue the ruble and introduce a currency pegged to the dollar or euro”. As a result, “the Russian stock market went into a meltdown Thursday, causing a halt in trading for 35 minutes and prompting the local press to dub the day ‘Black Thursday’.” It was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.” It did not cause a complete collapse, though. The “Soros Empire” replacing the “Soviet Empire” had to wait as Soros has “not been able to crack…The Russian Federation. Russia’s political pragmatism and humanist value system rooted in a traditional, ‘nation-state’ culture most likely infuriates Soros”. Soros has been trying to capture and kill-off for Russia for nearly a decade to no avail.
Soros thought he would have a chance at infiltrating Russia during Medvedev’s rule. The 2009 “Russian reset” was an attempt by the Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State, to improve relations between the United States and Russia. Medvedev also received the “I’ll have more flexibility after the (November 2012) election” message from Obama before he turned over his office to Putin. Furthermore, in a document from November 2012 entitled, “OSF [Open Society Foundation] Russia Strategic Planning Meeting Notes”, members of the OSF discussed how to “Identify joint priorities for OSF’s Russia activities in the coming year. How can we most effectively collaborate, considering the deteriorating political environment for our partners?” According to Zero Hedge, “The main revelation of the document minutes comes from the hope that Medvedev’s years as president would provide the NGOs the “opening” they would need to finally break the Russian bear. That all evaporated in May of 2012, when Vladimir Putin returned to the President’s office. The OSF, clearly distraught and disappointed, began to lay down the groundwork for how to challenge the Putin administration, in light of his very different approach to dealing with NGOs like the Open Society Foundation. The DNC leaks further revealed, “The human rights context has greatly changed from 2006 to 2012: the Medvedev period allowed for a number of improvements and significant openings for NGOs. Amendments to the NGO law in 2006 led to campaigning on behalf of NGOs; many of our grantees benefited during this period. Surkov established ties with many groups that were willing to cooperate with the state and our partners served as experts in key processes like police reform. A space was created for modernization and for the inclusion of civil society during Medvedev’s term. However, pressure has come back very quickly in the short time that Putin has been back in power.” Putin’s election put not only Soros’s plan for world domination at risk in several areas.
First was the passage of the Magnitsky Act which was done shortly after Obama was re-elected. The main point of the law was to supposedly punish Russian officials who were thought to be responsible for the death of Russian tax accountant Sergei Magnitsky by “prohibiting their entrance to the United States and their use of its banking system”. Senators Ben Cardin (D-MD) and John McCain (R-AZ) proposed the legislation brought to them by Magnitsky’s American born businessman friend Bill Browder. The Senate passed the House version of the act on December 6, 2012 with Obama signing it on December 14, 2012. Vladimir Putin retaliated against the United States’s passage of the Magnitsky Act by banning adoptions of Russian children by citizens of the United States. The Magnitsky Act becomes a platform upon which Amal Clooney bases many of her “cases” including the Maldives, Azerbijian, and Myanmar. In fact, the Clooneys dined with UK Labour Leader (and brother of former Prime Minister David) Ed Milliband in January of 2015 to brief him on “proposals to implement a ‘Magnitsky law’ over a private meal with the Hollywood actor and his wife, Amal, the human rights lawyer.” In 2016, Congress enacted the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the US government to sanction foreign government officials implicated in human rights abuses anywhere in the world. The Magnitsky Act later becomes a cornerstone of the coup attempt against President Trump. More on this later…
Eventually the Russian government realized the cancerous nature of Soros backed NGOs and took the proper preventative measures. In November of 2015, Putin effectively banned Soros from the country: “Russian Prosecutor General’s Office issued a statement in which it recognized George Soros’s Open Society Institute and another affiliated organization as ‘undesirable groups’, banning Russian citizens and organizations from participation in any of their projects. Prosecutors said the activities of the Open Society Institute and the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation were a threat to the foundations of Russia’s Constitutional order and national security. They added that the Justice Ministry would be duly informed about these conclusions and would add the two groups to Russia’s list of undesirable foreign organizations”. Per the DC Leaks , it proved a very wise move. The DC Leaks showed how dangerous the Open Society and George Soros were to the well-being and preservation of the Russian Federation and the Russian culture.
Since Soros has not been able to topple Russia from within, he had his agents placed around the area attempting to bait Putin into war. There are many in the Ukraine placed through an illegal coup of a democratically elected government using neo-Nazi strong men. The Soros, Clinton and her campaign manager John Podesta are very active in the Ukrainian energy sector which is under constant threat by Putin. Billionaire Victor Pinchuk donated upwards of $25 million to the Clinton Foundation in order to pressure former Ukrainian President Yanukovych to release Yulia Tymoshenko – a political rival of Yanukovych and a “client” of Amal Clooney’s – from jail. Then there is Syria. Russia and Turkey have fought with Syria against ISIS and the Obama/Soros backed “rebels” over a pipeline here. In July of 2012, Amal traveled as an “adviser” to Kofi Annan when he met with Putin to discuss the Syrian crisis. Seeing no diplomatic resolution, the “Responsibility to Protect” was invoked in December of 2012: “The Government of Syria is manifestly failing to protect its populations,” the Secretary-General’s Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, Adama Dieng, said in a statement in December 2012. “The international community must act on the commitment made by all Heads of State and Government at the 2005 World Summit to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, including their incitement,” said Mr. Dieng. This seems to be the end game for every area of the world where regime change is needed to expedite the harvesting of resources. Soros has been a supporter of the “Responsibility to Protect” since the overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya:
“Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has been described by its founders and proponents, including Soros, as promoting global governance while allowing the international community to penetrate a nation state’s borders under certain conditions. Libya regarded as test of global doctrine…The joint U.S. and international air strikes targeting Libya are widely regarded as a test of Responsibility to Protect which is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege, but a responsibility…According to the principle, any state’s sovereignty can be overrun, including with the use of military force,if the international community decides it must act to halt what it determines to be genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”
It obviously did not work in Syria. Therefore the “Restrain the Veto” initiative was invoked in 2015 at the UN when Laurent Fabius, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development, stated, “Quite simply because we cannot resign ourselves to the Security Council’s paralysis when mass atrocities are committed, and we see this in numerous situations, including in Syria. The main idea is that the veto isn’t a privilege, it’s a responsibility”. Amal was present and given a shout out in the warmonging speech: “Finally, I want to welcome the very many prominent figures who are here with us today. I cannot name you all, but if it is not embarrassing to her, I would like to mention in particular Mrs Amal Clooney, who was kind enough to join us, and who will be able to help us achieve this just cause in all the countries where she exerts influence.” Where she exerts influence? In any event, Hillary Clinton promised to topple Asaad as a “humanitarian” mission after her “coronation”, so with her shocking loss, the threat of war eased. Aleppo has since been freed by Russia and Turkey. A tentative peace deal has been established. Lives have been spared. If it all holds, the “refugee” crisis can effectively rectify itself, thus ending the “humanitarian” “open borders” push, no hope for war with Russia, and Putin looks like a hero. Other than “hacking” claims, Soros will have to find other ways to antagonizing Putin into war without GOP led American help.
These are just a few major areas of the world where we have seen the depravity of George Soros in actions. In fact, almost every area of conflict in the world today has his fingerprints on it. However, he has a lot of help in selling his “humanitarian” regime change aegnda. In the United States it is mostly the democrat party and pop culture. Enter George Clooney. Clooney is the modern day Goebbels to Soros as the modern day Hitler. With Soros’s wealth and Clooney’s pop culture presence, they have attempted to create a fakenews “media” endeavor, including the suppression of opposing viewpoints, to create a Newspeak about which Orwell & Hitler could have only dreamed. George’s marriage to Amal, an Israeli hating Muslim from an extremely wealthy and well connected Middle Eastern family including her mother who is an Al Jazeera reporter and foreign editor of Al Hayat, created the UN PowerCouple of Media Matters/Participant Media.
Media Matters/Participant Media
Soros has been using much of his money to support the Democratic Party and organizations associated with it. Forbes magazine says Soros has a net worth of $22 billion, making him the 7th richest person in America. The only hedge-fund manager ranked in Forbes’s top ten, Soros lives in Katonah, New York, where Hillary Clinton served as a United States Senator for two terms from 2001-2009. In 2002, Soros and Morton Halperin, leader of Soros’ Open Society Institute, started discussions regarding the “Center for American Progress”(CAP), a think tank designed specifically for and with the help of Hillary Clinton to use the Democrat Party in the United States to advance the takedown of the Constitution through “social justice” platforms such as “energy, national security, economic growth, immigration, education, and healthcare”. In other words, “climate”, “refugee” and “education”. Since the money is funneled into this “nonprofit”, it is not subject to Citizens United-type “get big money out of politics” laws, which is why Democrats have no trouble pushing for “campaign finance reform”. At the time, Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, praised Soros for engineering the “privatization” of the Democratic Party through funding of the “527 ‘nonprofit’” political groups and bypassing what he called an incompetent Democratic Party apparatus.
In addition, Soros was convinced the Bush election victory in 2000 followed by a subsequent majority win in both houses of Congress two years later had everything to do with the GOP’s great media presence. As such, “One of CAP’s chief priorities has been to carry out ‘rapid response’ to what it calls conservative ‘attacks’ in the media.” To this end, CAP has always maintained numerous spokespeople, such as George Clooney, and “experts” ready to appear on short notice on national talk shows to debate or respond to conservative commentators. Furthermore, Soros eventually realized, like Hitler, that the best way to control the vote besides fraud involved the manipulation of the masses via pop culture propaganda, so on May 3, 2004, CAP helped launch David Brock’s Media Matters for America to serve as a “ ‘watchdog’ organization monitoring ‘rightwing’ media for ethics violations and factual inaccuracies. According to the NY Times, Brock conferred with Hillary Clinton, Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD a distinguished senior fellow with CAP) and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore about Media Matters before embarking on the project.” This is the same David Brock
who directed the pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC Correct the Record and wrote “The Travelgate Cover-Up” for The American Spectator in June of 1994. In it he referred to the couple’s “influence-peddling and sleazy deal-making” and claimed that “Screwing over the ‘little people’ is the Clintons’ prerogative.” He also put scare quotes around “strong moral compass” in reference to Hillary Clinton and referred to her and her husband’s desire to ensure that former employees “would be ruined, Arkansas-style.” Pushing “fake news” via Brock with Soros money seemed the best way to “sell” Hillary to a “deplorable” public.
In that same year, Participant Media was founded by Jeffrey Skoll, the former President of eBay, to fund feature films and documentaries that promote their social values (regardless of facts) in order to promote agenda while still being commercially viable. It is not shocking to learn then that Participant Media is financed in part by Soros: “That project then served as a consultant to Participant in creating its index, which received $4.2 million in combined financing from the Knight and Gates foundations and from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.” Several popular yet intentionally factually incorrect films produced by this company to push the agenda’s points included the award-winning Hollywood darling Al Gore documentary on “global warming” entitled An Inconvenient Truth, which, according to the Soros DC Leaks, received $30 million over three years to push this global warming hysteria, even forcing it as mandatory viewing in public middle schools to brainwash our children.
The first major Hollywood player at Participant Media was George Clooney. Both Syriana and Good Night and Good Luck are Participant Media endeavors. Both movies pushed false media narratives, too. Syriana was used in part to push the “Americans are Islamophobic” and “Oil is bad” mantras. Allan H. Ryskind, author of “Hollywood Traitors: Blacklisted Screenwriters Agents of Stalin, Allies of Hitler”, observed:
Allan H. Ryskind, author of “Hollywood Traitors: Blacklisted Screenwriters Agents of Stalin, Allies of Hitler”, observed:
“How many movies, for instance, show Americans bravely routing Islamic terrorists? How many films offer any justification for the harsh interrogation techniques or important internal security measures we have used to keep our country safe since 9/ 11? Almost none, of course…Take the film Syriana, for instance, for which George Clooney won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. A heroic Arab prince wants to end corruption and oppression, especially of women, and modernize his country. And wouldn’t you know it, the CIA obliterates him and his family with a remote-controlled missile. The film also features a wonderfully humane Pakistani who feels impelled by America’s heinous policies to become a suicide bomber and carries out a mission similar to the terrorist assault on the USS Cole. (Just for the record , the suicide bombers that severely damaged the Cole and murdered seventeen American sailors were directed by Osama bin Laden’s “idealistic” group, al Qaeda.)”
In exchange for sanitizing Islam, Clooney’s propaganda snagged him an Oscar and won him, Warner Brothers, and his and Grant Hezlov’s Section Eight Productions an award in 2006 from the Muslim Public Affairs Council which, “in an effort to promote positive and accurate portrayals of Islam and Muslims…each year recognizes voices of courage and conscience who are the best in their field”. They were honored for creating an “eye-opening portrait of politics, petroleum and power”. The Islamafication of America via pop culture was underway with Clooney at the helm.
Meanwhile Good Night and Good Luck acted as a propaganda piece to paint the McCarthy era as one in which “paranoid conservatives” were on a “Communist witch hunt against Democrats” when in reality, McCarthy’s suspicion of Communists in Hollywood working against American interests was very real. Clooney admitted as much in an interview with Salon during the press junket for the movie. According to Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies by M. Stanton Evans:
“A second recent treatment of the Moss affair that deserves brief notice isn’t a scholarly work, but undoubtedly has done more to spread disinformation about the case than a dozen history books together. This is the George Clooney film Good Night and Good Luck, released in 2005, based on the 1954 confrontation between McCarthy and Edward R. Murrow (the title of the film is taken from Murrow’s habitual sign-off). This Clooney opus portrays McCarthy as a fearsome dragon and Murrow as the brave knight-errant who dared to slay him. In a mix of modern production methods and video clips taken from the archives, the movie affects to be a study in cinema verité, supposedly revealing the evil of McCarthy simply by showing him in action. The case of Annie Lee Moss is featured, as it was by Murrow himself back in the 1950s. It’s of interest that neither in the Clooney film nor in the original Murrow broadcast is there any evidence cited to indicate Moss was an innocent victim—the message being conveyed instead by video clips of Moss and of McClellan browbeating Cohn for allegedly treating her unfairly. In the case of the Murrow broadcast, when not all the relevant data were known, this was to some extent excusable (though had Murrow and Co. been the crack journalists they professed to be, they could have dug out the facts about Hattie Griffin and the like from the hearing transcripts). In the case of the Clooney film, there is no excuse whatever, as the truth about the case is fully available to anyone who bothers to review the voluminous SACB reports and archives of the Bureau. Amazingly, in a press interview about all this, Clooney made it clear he had been informed that Mrs. Moss was a Communist and that he didn’t deny it. Instead, he said, the real question stressed by Murrow and his colleagues, and therefore in the Clooney film, was that “they simply demand that she has a right to face her accuser.”19 We are thus informed, after fifty years of being told Mrs. Moss was not a Communist but a mistaken-identity victim, that wasn’t the point at all! It was, instead, her right to face her accuser. If Clooney was indeed aware of the copious evidence on the case, as he should have been in presuming to inform the world about it, he certainly disguised this knowledge in his movie. In the interests of historical truth, the data set forth above should at least have been alluded to, making it clear Mrs. Moss was in fact what Markward (and McCarthy) said, and not the victim of a mistaken-identity foul-up. But, of course, if Clooney had brought out these facts of record, he would have had no movie. Such information would have undercut the thesis of the film about the bullying and reckless lying of McCarthy.”
Perhaps Clooney still has some hard feelings towards McCarthy for calling his uncle Jose Ferrer before his committee back in the 1950’s. In any event, remember this: “Soros…appreciates that a human-rights mantra, particularly when amplified with the U.N.’s global megaphone, is a formidable tool for manipulating public policy. A tool, mind you, and not a principle… all sharing common goals: diminishing American power and mothballing the idea of unadulterated universal values”? This movie did that. It attempted to put the onus on modern-day conservatives as the enemy of “progress” to divert from those who are, indeed, working to erase our sovereignty in lieu of global ruling governance. It crafted “fake news” as truth. Consequently, as with Syriana, in exchange for this propaganda piece, Clooney’s profile was raised significantly in Hollywood including several Academy Award nominations and other critical accolades. Makes sense, then, that this film was the focus of the September 2005 Reel Progress film series in Washington D.C. Reel Progress, established in March of 2005 on the heels of Participant Media, was a new progressive film series sponsored by the aforementioned Soros Center for American Progress.
The same year Media Matters launched was also the year of the first documented meeting between Soros and Barack Obama. In June 2004, the billionaire hosted a fundraiser for Obama’s U. S. Senate campaign at his New York home. Additionally, George’s dad, Nick, who held no political office whatsoever in his life but did consider himself a “trusted journalist”, ran in 2004 as the lone Democrat for Congress in his Kentucky district. As hard as George tried to infiltrate this highly conservative area with Soros progressivism, his dad lost, probably because the bulk of his fundraising came from Hollywood and Beverly Hills, not from the people who actually live there. Clooney’s attempt at forcibly importing Hollywood values to America’s heartland failed. However, the “Perfect Storm” of Hollywood (Clooney), Media (Media Matters and Participant Media) and Democrats (Clinton, Soros, and Obama) had come to fruition. Ultimately, their hubris cost them not only Nick’s election but many others, as well, from the rise of the Tea Party in the 2010 midterms to Hillary’s embarrassing defeat to Donald Trump in 2016.
The democrat primary of 2016 was rigged to favor Hillary Clinton. We know this through the DNC emails provided by Wikileaks whose founder, Julian Assange, as at one time a client of Hillary Clinton fundraiser Amal Clooney before she married George. In any event, the undercover work of another prime target of Media Matters, Project Veritas journalist James O’Keefe, produced an undercover video series titled “Rigging The Election”, an exposé they have described as a “multi-part series which exposes the dark secrets at the highest levels of the DNC and Clinton presidential campaign.” In this video, a PVA journalist exposes how his “pay for play with Robert Creamer landed him a meeting with Bradley Beychock, the President of Media Matters For America, an organization that has been attacking James O’Keefe for years. During the meeting, Beychock gave the PVA journalist a tour of their offices. He also proudly boasted about the Media Matters assault on conservative writer and political consultant Roger Stone.” Bullying. Censorship. These are the actions in which Media Matters work to make Democrats palpable to the American people. Brock even went so far as to demand that Bernie Sanders stop “negative attacks” against Hillary. Brock knew the Democrat primary was rigged against Sanders. Sanders did not. Brock did not need the popular Sanders smearing their already established candidate, “helping Karl Rove and his ilk do their general election dirty work.” Sanders eventually got on board…after buying a new beach house.
One area in which the Democrat hubris is apparent is with Islam. While Participant Media and Clooney worked on smoothing over the image of radical Islam while demeaning anyone who spoke out it against it with movies like Syriana and Good Night and Good Luck, Soros continued with his attempt to mainstream Islam, as well. First off, in September of 2011, Soros looked to expand his operations in Egypt via the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which is run in partnership with the Open Society Justice Initiative. The group seeks to develop a national network of legal empowerment actors for referral of public-interest law cases. Such organizations in the past have helped represent Muslim Brotherhood leaders seeking election or more authority in the country. In addition, the George Soros-funded Social Science Research Council, along with the Edward R. Murrow (think Good Night and Good Luck) College of Communication at Washington State University, received $50,000 from the Open Society Institute as one of the groups behind a new course on Islam designed for journalists which tries to minimize the impact and importance of ”jihad” by comparing it to the number of murders in America each year.
That same course in keeping with Newspeak pushed claims ”right-wing activists” tried to tie American Muslims to terrorism and does not mention examples of Islamic attacks on press freedom. That fits with a theme for liberal financier Soros, who has spent more than $52 million on influencing the media. The Islamic course also links to another Soros-funded entity, the well-financed Center for American Progress.” In about 30 pages of text with links to other reports and articles, journalists can go through and read about the history of Islam, Muslims in America, and how to cover stories on Islam. Besides learning basic facts about Muslims and their history, the course adds ways to put “jihad” into perspective, attack conservatives, and provide a list of liberal groups that can be contacted for expert advice and quotes.” He is funding an operation to train “journalists” on how to “properly” cover Muslims.
However, when this push to “normalize” Islam while claiming to be the “party of women and LGBT issues” was questioned in line with the Clinton pay-to-play scheme of accepting large bribes from nations that violate the rights of these groups, Media Matters stepped in to spin. In a memo dated March 9th 2015, Media Matters says Hillary and the Clinton Foundation’s practice of taking large donations from repressive regimes did not count against her as a “pro woman” and “pro LGBT” candidate because she “speaks out” a lot. By the time this memo was written, Media Matters had fully converted into Hillary’s advocate. According to Warren Todd Huston of Breitbart:
“A recent piece in National Journal reveals that Media Matters and two other far-left groups — American Bridge and Correct The Record — have all turned their organizations into Hillary advocates well before her announcement.
Media Matters has been the main purveyor of the leftist, Democratic message. Even National Journal, a left-leaning publication, notes that Media Matters easily programs the national media narrative: It is “often easy to trace Media Matters’ influence on a major news story… Regardless, it appears that Brock and company have assigned to themselves the duty of getting Hillary Clinton elected President of the United States.”
Another angle Media Matters thought it had covered involved the background of Hillary’s top aide, Huma Abedin. That was until Vanity Fair reported on Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, including her time as an assistant editor at The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs from 1996 until 2008 which leads to her family’s association with Abdullarh Omar Nasseef who, “In his early years as the patron of the Abedins’ journal, (Nasseef) was the secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which Andrew McCarthy, the former assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted the ‘Blind Sheik’, Omar Abdel Rahman, in the wake of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, claims ‘has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.’ This information can be verified with a simple Google search. It is not “fake news”. However, Media Matters came out swinging with their ad hominem smear tactics parroted by the mainstream media to denounce “Right wing conspiracies” and “xenophobia”. If the general public knew the depths of Hillary Clinton’s (and Clooney’s) ties to radical Islam and the pay to play scheme via the Clinton Foundation involved with these human rights abusing countries that hate the west, there was no way she would get elected. David Brock and Media Matters worked to make sure no one found out, pushing “fake news” to vilify anyone who got in their way.
The manipulation of the press/media to formulate the west as Islamophobic especially in America, has gone full throttle with Clooney who claims to be for “freedom of speech and freedom of the press”. After all, George reminds us at every opportunity that his dad, Nick, was a “journalist”. As with “democracy”, no he is not…unless it suits his politics. He advocates for silencing dissenting voices just as much as his employers. Take the Media Matters hit pieces on Foxnews hosts. They went after Sean Hannity and failed. They went after Tucker Carlson not once (which included their ‘supporters’ surrounding his home as his wife and children cowered inside) but twice. Tucker, to his credit, unearthed a smear campaign of his own against current Media Matters President Angelo Carusone. As a good democrat, Carusone has projected onto Tucker what he in reality is himself….a racist, homophobic anti Semite. Tucker and Hannity developed the spine to push back after Clooney and Media Matters ran Bill O’Reilly off the network.
Knowing now how almost hand picked Clooney was to lead the Media Matters/CAP propaganda brigade, no one should be surprised at the platform he was given to defend himself against O’Reilly when Bill questioned back in 2005 where all of Hollywood’s “charity” money went once it was raised. He said, “In the aftermath of the 9/11 attack, there was a celebrity-driven TV telethon that raised millions for the affected families, (and) now there will be another telethon raising money for those hurt by those the tsunami (including) our pal George Clooney…You may also remember that Clooney strenuously objected to The Factor investigation that uncovered problems in distributing the 9/11 money, even though we proved our case and the Red Cross revamped its entire operation because of it.” George got very defensive and went on Letterman & The Today Show to call O’Reilly names, insist there was no fraud involved (they had not released the funds because they had not yet received the names of the dead. Have they since? ) and demand O’Reilly “put up or shut up” and appear on the telethon. O’Reilly accepted the invite. Eventually, though, O’Reilly was silenced. Media Matters & Participant Media are Goebbel like entities created by George Soros to push their narrative while silencing opposition with Clooney as their pop culture conduit. Hitler would be proud and McCarthy vindicated.
Since then, Media Matters has moved into censoring “fake news” online with the help of Facebook, meaning Media Matters gets to decide what stays and what goes. This, of course, means anything that does not fit the progressive narrative. Just recently, on March 21, 2019, David Brock announced a $50 million effort to “weaken Trump” in 2020. Clooney has run other telethons, most notably for Haiti. He also had a hand in “humanitarian aid” in almost every “humanitarian” disaster and “human rights” project in the world through “The Sentry” and the “Enough Project” housed, not coincidentally, at the Center for American “Progress” in Washington D.C. However, every area of the world he claimed to want to help he has abandoned leaving them in way worse shape as his bank account has grown. In fact, every single “charity” with which he is involved through “Global Citizen” was outed in some sort of fraud and/or sex abuse case after Trump’s election. Does Mrs. O’Reilly realize how correct he probably was about George Clooney’s “charity”?
The “Enough” Project
Today’s communists hide behind the term “democracy” with the likes of Soros, Evans, and Clooney’s other handlers leading the way. Soros’s right hand man is John Podesta, White House Chief of Staff to President Clinton from October 1998 until January 2001, “counselor” to President Obama from January 2014 until February 2015, and the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s spectacular president loss in 2016. He is also the former President and now Chair and Counselor of Soros’s Center for American Progress. In 2007, the Podesta/Soros CAP co-founded the “Enough” Project with Evans’s International Crisis Group. Its stated mission is to “end genocide and crimes against humanity” focused primarily on “conflict areas in Africa including Sudan, South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic… which facilitates several campaigns and initiatives which work to bring attention to these crises, including The Sentry, Raise Hope for Congo, and the Satellite Sentinel Project.” The leader of the Enough Project, The Sentry and the Satellite Sentinel Project? George Clooney.
Another person involved in the strings pulled here is John Prendergast. He worked closely with Samantha Power as a “US advocate of intervention in Africa (who) had started his career as a humanitarian in Sudan, writing reports on the excruciating violence between rival southern militias for Human Rights Watch. Under Bill Clinton, he had worked at the National Security Council as Director for African Affairs and as an advisor to Susan Rice in the State Department. He would later work for the Evans’s International Crisis Group”. With this “Enough” Project, Prendergast became the “humanitarian bridge to the Hollywood elite, helping recruit Clooney (Sudan), Angelina Jolie (sexual violence in war zones), Matt Damon (water), Ben Affleck (Congo) and Don Cheadle (genocide and environment)”. Keeping in mind Brad Pitt co-founded the “Not On Our Watch” project with Clooney and Prendergast, it seems the Ocean’s cast were almost handpicked. Actually, ever notice that Clooney tends to work with the same small group of people in almost every movie? Most of them are part of the Enough Project. In this group, Podesta and Evans have a group of Hollywood and pop culture sycophants to brainwash the masses the likes of which Hitler and Goebbels could only have dreamed. Whenever their faces appear, remember who they represent…those who pinpoint areas with George’s Satellite Sentinel Project to destabilize those regions economically, crash their economies, swoop in “save” the country as they get rich off the backs of the hard working people of that nation by raping the country’s resources, and then put their minions in place to lord over the mineral recovery and the destitute citizens while importing a replacement citizenry of “refugees”. Almost everywhere they have done it, Clooney has been involved with his ‘humanitarian” projects…Ukraine, Sudan, Congo, Malaysia, Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya…and now they are all working to do it in the west.
This is why they hate Trump. He represents their biggest obstacles to world domination. The first step was cutting off their funding through perpetual war. First, he allowed the destruction of ISIS in Syria (who the Obama administration armed). In fact, on Friday, March 22, 2019, the declaration of their defeat militarily in Syria was stated publicly. Therefore, there will be no regime change in Syria while Trump is President which means no war with Russia while he is in office which means vast quantities of oil are left for Putin. Additionally, remember when Clooney had to step up for Hollywood and support his friend Obama when tensions rose between Kim Jung Un with the Sony hack and The Interview? Then Trump was going to get us all killed via a nuclear confrontation with “Rocket Man”? Trump has since brought peace to the Korean peninsula. In March 2019, the US and South Korea ended spring military drills to “back diplomacy” and North Korea withdrew from the DMZ joint liaison office. Finally, Trump killed the Iranian nuclear deal which halts any potential conflict with Israel. His election also exposed the rabid anti-Semitism on the left including repeated calls for Israel’s destruction. Remember when Amal Clooney accepted a request to serve on a UN panel to investigate Israeli “war crimes” in the Gaza strip in 2014? She quickly withdrew her name from consideration because she did not want it to overshadow her three day wedding extravaganza. The elimination of the Jews is part of their plan. That will not happen for now. They could only invade Syria, Israel, etc via the “Responsibility to Protect” with a willing participant. With Trump in office, implementation of the R2P will not occur in the many areas of the world the Clinton camp had their eyes on which means no rich minerals to harvest and the “refugee” flow could stop since people have no need to leave and/or can return home. They hate Trump because he has choked off a primary source of their wealth from perpetual war.
Then there is Trump’s support of free market capitalism over socialism which they have tried to promote here. Venezuela’s President Maduro was praised by the likes of Sean Penn and Oliver Stone for his great “socialist haven”. Now, the people of Venezuela have gone three days without electrical power and are literally scouring the streets for food. The Paris Climate Agreement/renewable energy is not helping the people of Venezuela. The same Hollywood stooges screeched when Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement because it is designed to act as the UN’s ultimate financial grab by redistributing the wealth of the western nations to third world nations to help alleviate “poverty”. Noble except that the money always seems to get intercepted by these “humanitarians” when it transfers from the “first” world to the “third” world. Additionally, the United States has decreased its carbon footprint while out of the Paris Climate Accord while the top polluters, China and India, keep running unchecked with no calls from these Hollywood “environmentalists” for these countries to join the Paris Agreement. Trump is their “wall” to 1% domination. Not only that but most of them since the election have been outed as hypocritical long time friends/supporters/coverers for sexual predators after years of claiming to be “pro women”. Some of them were even accused themselves. It is why every person involved in these Clooney endeavors suffered a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome after the 2016 election. Their covers as “humanitarians”, “environmentalists” and “pro women” could be blown. A quick rundown of some of the “Enough” Project members and their violations:
George Clooney – A lifetime member of the Council of Foreign Relations, he famously declared in May of 2016 from Cannes “There’s not gonna be a President Trump”. Already noted is his involvement with the Magnitsky Act, which was being used to help take Trump out. Eventually we will find Amal and her family are tied to all the members of the Spygate/Russian Collusion attempted coup, too. Additionally, George was accused of blacklisting Vanessa Marquez, an actress on ER who recently spoke out against the sex assault on set. The woman who accused him was conveniently shot dead in a supposedly unrelated incident later. He is also a longtime friend of Harvey Weinstein and Les Moonves. In fact, Moonves takes credit for Clooney’s career in terms of getting him the breakout role on NBC’s ER, and his wife, Julie Chen, was given the exclusive to announce their pregnancy. Clooney also trashed Trump at the French Cesars Awards in February of 2017 as he defended child rapist Roman Polanski. Clooney is a sex assault enabler, if not one himself, tied to the attempted coup of a sitting President, and has also profiteered handsomely from the regime change he supports. For example, Nespresso claimed the coffee fields in South Sudan once the country was established with the help of George Clooney. He then received a $40 million contract as their spokesperson. He has not been back to visit since. Nespresso claimed he would be in 2015, but that all changed in 2016 a month before the rigged election. The country is now, as President Trump would say, a “shithole”. That’s “Democracy” George Clooney style.
Matt Damon – Damon appeared in numerous films with Clooney including the “Ocean’s” trilogy, “The Good Shepherd, “The Monuments Men” and “Suburbicon”. He intentionally misinterpreted Trump’s Charlottesville remarks in order to call him “absolutely abhorrent”. He owes his career to Harvey Weinstein as Weinstein gave him and his best friend Ben Affleck (who is also a member of the “Enough” Project) their big break with Good Will Hunting.
Julianne Moore – starred in “Suburbicon” with Damon and Clooney. Says what the Trump Administration is doing is “incredibly detrimental” (does not matter the subject). She joined a protest during the inauguration. She supports the elimination of our constitutional rights, especially the Second Amendment, and advocates for post birth abortion. She, too, claimed shock about Weinstein after decades of working with him and suddenly remembered James Tobak harassed her once. No problem keeping her mouth shut for years stay employed (and famous) while claiming to support women.
Don Cheadle – another Ocean’s 11 alum. His entire Twitter feed reads like some racist dialogue handed to Clooney’s token black friend to spew. Some of his insane rants are in this link. He blames the violence in Chicago, Obama’s homebase, ON TRUMP, not the economic and political issues brought on by decades of democrat rule and/or strict gun control laws.which Obama completely ignored for eight years. Cheadle worked for Weinstein (see: Oceans), attended the Weinstein Oscar parties, worked with accused rapist Paul Haggis…the list goes on.
Ryan Gosling – starred with Clooney in The Ides of March, which was a full on GOP bashing film, and with Cheadle in The United States of Leland. He’s Canadian, so…here he is with Will Ferrell appearing as “The Knife Guys,” hawking Trump knives, which unfortunately had disappointing results. Imagine doing that to Obama? On the Weinstein front, Gosling was “oblivious” to the claims.
Angelina Jolie – soon-to-be ex-wife of Brad Pitt who starred with Clooney in the Ocean’s trilogy as well as Burn After Reading. He also co-founded the “Not on Our Watch” project with Clooney and Cheadle and was involved with this one for a while although his name is no longer on the website. Angie’s is, though. 2007 was a banner year for her- worked closely with the Clinton Global Initiative , joined the Council on Foreign Relations , made her first public appearance with Brad Pitt at the Cannes Film Festival in May the same month they made a joint million dollar donation to three organizations in Chad and Sudan dedicated to those affected by the crisis in the Darfur because, coincidentally, that was the year the “Enough” Project was founded. In 2012, her primary role shifted to that of UN refugee “special envoy”. In 2017, she wrote an op-ed in rebuttal to the non-existent “Trump Travel Ban” stating it should be based on “facts not fear”. She should take her own advice. See, there is no “ban” of any one person or group of people. There is a stronger vetting process of those arriving from the seven countries on the list. Of those seven countries, two (North Korea and Venezuela) are not Muslim. If this “ban” was Islamophobic, only Muslim majority countries would be on the list, and that list would contain over fifty nations. Finally, it is not “Trump’” ban. This list was put together by Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s “justice” department during the Obama era. The appropriate term for this “list”, then, is “Obama’s Selective Vetting List”. They were all quiet then. In 2017, she just read the script she was given…if she had anything to do with it at all.
Javier Bardem star of the Coen Brother’s No Country for Old Men; perhaps the Coen brothers need investigating? Between their use of Clooney in a large majority for their movies, plus Pitt, Damon, Moore…they seem to cull talent from this cesspool. Bardem defends Woody Allen while his wife Penelope Cruz called her one time collaborator Weinstein “complicated” . Both are anti-Semites who had to be chastised by the father of Enough co-hort Angelina Jolie. .
Robin Wright– ex-wife to proud socialist Sean Penn who lauds human rights violator Castro as a “great leader” and said of Venezuela’s Chavez, “(Chávez) is a fascinating guy. He’s done… incredible things for the 80% of the people that are very poor there”. Wright stars in House of Cards as an incredibly narcissistic, sociopathic first lady in a marriage of convenience for political and financial gain. Of course, she says “Trump stole (House of Cards) ideas” when clearly this entire series is based on the Clintons. She plays the Hillary Clinton role, which means Kevin Spacey played the Bill Clinton part. You know Kevin Spacey…starred in The Men Who Stare At Goats with Clooney and held fundraisers in New Mexico with him for Democrat Bill Richardson? The same Kevin Spacey who was fired from House of Cards as sex assault after sex assault piled up against him? All men, many underage. Wright says, like the rest, she was “surprised” by these accusations and said he deserved a “second chance”. She, too, has worked with Harvey Weinstien many times over the years. In 2009 she attended the Weinstein Company’s dinner for “The Private Lives of Pippa Lee”. She’s like the rest of these “humanitarian” “Enough” project women…in the know about all the abuse…covered it up/stayed silent, stood by as it happened, and then feigned shock once discovered to save face. This plays-pretend-for-a-living person told CNN that Trump knows “so little about the world” especially where the Iran deal was concerned. This woman advocated giving nukes to a top sponsor of Islamic terror who chant “Death to America” in their streets to throw the President under the bus while working with/enabling sex offenders. Funny enough, like Clooney, she got her big break on NBC on the soap opera Santa Barbara. Let’s continue with NBC “Enough Project” members…..
Chris Meloni: the Law & Order: SUV star has Trump Derangement Syndrome almost as badly as Cheadle. His Twitter feed shows this. Take, for instance, “With all due respect – shut up u f—ing d—,” Meloni tweeted. “Ur damaged goods and only Putin and idiots and brown Nosers believe in u.” There is plenty more. Meloni tweeted an article from a former McCain aide titled “We Deserve Better Than Donald Trump” that referred to Trump as a “xenophobic bigot” and openly questioned his readiness for office. He has also called Trump a “snake oil salesman.” Of course, with the release of the Mueller report, we know there was not only no collusion between Trump and Russia but no obstruction, either. As for John McCcain, as the one who delivered the fake dossier that put in motion the Mueller witch hunt, he became every democrats favorite Republican before he died. In addition, Meloni tweets about being naked and also had no issue posting naked photos of Melania Trump. TDS has that effect. Of course, whatever misogynist activities he partakes in real life gets a pass because he plays a sex assault crime fighter at work, right?
Mariska Hargitay: Meloni’s former SVU costar had a recurring role on Clooney’s ER in the late 90’s. She kept quieter politically, though during the GOP primary she once jokingly suggested that it would be better if she were leading in the polls.” She actively supported Clinton. Keep in mind there’s an entire SVU episode dedicated to Trump bashing. This came after one of the debates where former Law & Order writer David Slack tweeted, “the only role Donald Trump could have in Law & Order is as a rich bastard suspected of killing his wife,” and former Law & Order: SVU executive producer Warren Leigh called Trump a “human virus.” Both Slack and Leigh spent the evening live tweeting the debate and criticizing Trump on Twitter; Slack said it looked like Hillary Clinton “was debating the comments section,” and Leigh said Trump “wet himself in the ring.” Then again this is NBC the network that hired Chelsea Clinton for a six figure job with no experience right out of college.
Melissa Fitzgerald & Alison Janney – More NBC political fiction this time from Aaron Sorkin’s The West Wing. They think their acting credentials make them political experts. Fitzgerald was sent to D. C. to be “Senior Director of Justice for Vets”. Yup. Senior director. As for Janney, in response to a tweet by real life Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, actor Bradley Whitford, who portrayed White House Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman on the popular show, shut down Sanders – telling her she was “no C.J. Cregg.” “I know C.J. Cregg. C.J. Cregg is a friend of mine. You’re no C.J. Cregg,” Uh…there is no CJ Cregg. CJ Cregg is a FICTIONAL CHARACTER played by Allison Janney. She responded to the tweets thanking her former colleague for his sentiment. “Thanks for having my back, Josh love, C.J.,” she wrote on Twitter. THESE PEOPLE ARE CONGRATULATING THEMSELVES FOR FAKE ROLES THEY HELD IN THE FICTIONAL BUBBLE OF HOLLYWOOD. Meanwhile Huckabee Sanders endures their hate and ridicule daily which makes sense because we know how they handle real life misogyny and assault. They partake in it and cover it up. They project.
Julianna Margulies –starred with Clooney in NBC’s “ER”. Used her show “The Good Wife” to bash Americans and Trump repeatedly. On May 17, 2017, to an applauding crowd at Cipriani Wall Street during the Paley Center Honors, she proudly declare, “(Trump) will be in a padded cell someday.” Coincidentally, she “happened” to “recall” in November of 2017 harassment by Weinstein when she went for a screen test with him in 1996 during her third season on ER. Was Margulies silenced then like her ER co-star Vanessa Marquez? Then again, serial sex assault Les Moonves, who was instrumental in ER’s success, inked Margulies to a production deal with CBS in 2014 after having starred in The Good Wife for several years stating, ““Les Moonves has been a mentor and friend since the beginning of my career, when he brought me onto ER,” Margulies said. She knew of Weinstein and owed her career to Moonves while championing Woody Allen? Take a seat, sister.
Maria Bello – another ER alum from 1997-1998; 2010 she guest starred on Law & Order SVU. at the Sundance Film Festival in January of 2017, she began a speech with “Hello, all you pussies!” and concluded with an invocation of “pussy power”. Yeah…that’s “empowering”.
Ashely Judd– also starred on a NBC series, Sisters, where George Clooney once had a guest starring role before making it big. Strong feminist who majored in “women’s studies” admitted she was harassed by a “studio mogul” in 2015, but she DID NOT NAME HIM because the work kept coming. She did out him in time to perform her “nasty woman” speech at the “Women’s March” which turned out to be a Soros funded anti-Jew group led by radical Islamists who supports Sharia Law. Eventually, Weinstein got part of her case dismissed. These NBC/Hollywood “feminists” stayed silent on the sexual predators in Hollywood in order to stay employed. Feminists? No. Enablers. Makes one wonder about her appointment in March of 2016 as ambassador to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) where she oversees population control in third world countries covered by Clooney’s “humanitarian” initiatives.
Mia Farrow – her husband, Woody Allen, left her for her adopted daughter. He met Soon Yi when she was 9. He started an affair with her when she was supposedly 21. Their adopted daughter, Dylan, claimed Allen molested her at age 7. There was a lot of “he said/she said” between Mia and Woody in the years that followed. Then their son , Ronan Farrow, published the article that led to the fall of Harvey Weinstein. He was working at NBC at the time, but he says NBC brass like news President Noah Oppenheimer would not run the story. He left and published it at the New Yorker. After seeing all of the NBC names involved with Weinstein, including all of the ones listed here as Enough Project members, it might not seem surprising as to why they would not run the story. However, Farrow’s mother is arguably one of the biggest sexual predator/pedophile enablers in Hollywood even with her defense of her daughter, yet she is also considered one of the great “feminists” and “humanitarians” much like the rest on this list.
The “Enough” Project members are not “humanitarians” who want to stop any type of violence as they have enabled it most of their careers. They like having a platform to deflect from that, though, and “human rights activism” through Soros’s Center for American “Progress” gives them that. Notice it is always the same actors who show up to “protest” at the same anti-American events? They are kept working and are paid well by these anti-American entities to do so. Who knows? Maybe there is some blackmail involved. This incestuous pop culture and “social justice” relationship is one of which Hitler and Goebbels would be proud. “Good Night and Good Luck”, indeed.
The Satellite Sentinnel Project/The Sentry
The elites pinpoint areas ripe to invoke the Responsibility to Protect based on satellite technology that shows them where the most valuable resources are located. Clooney has two of them-the Satellite Sentinel Project and The Sentry part of the CAP. He claims they are used to “keep an eye on the bad guys”. Maybe although all signs point to most likely not.
The better part of the year “humanitarian” George Clooney stumped for support for the independence referendum in South Sudan for “democracy”, CAP broadened their conquest map in Africa through the “Enough” initiative from Sudan/Darfur with the Satellite Sentinel Project which, “Through the use of satellite imagery, SSP provides an early warning system to deter mass atrocities by focusing world attention and generating rapid responses on human rights and human security concerns”. The ten year “rapid response” that followed in South Sudan has made the situation worse, not better, but Nespresso got the coffee fields and Clooney got a $40 million contract as their spokesperson. It also just so happens that in August of 2009 Soros was a shareholder in DigitalGlobal, one of the companies Clooney uses to maintain his satellite projects. It seems coincidental that George uses technology provided by the Soros family to locate the “bad guys” in areas that are always where resources such as coffee & oil (South Sudan), cobalt (Congo), and oil (Libya & Syria) are plentiful.
“The Sentry”, which was an initiative of the “Enough” project, sought to “seek to build leverage for peace and justice in Africa by helping to create real consequences for the perpetrators and facilitators of genocide and other mass atrocities”. Note the Newspeak of “The Sentry” shifted from “genocide in Africa” to “Following the money that funds atrocities and crimes against humanity in order to track and analyze how armed conflict and atrocities are financed, sustained, and monetized. The Sentry uses open source data collection, field research, and state-of-the-art network data analysis (Google & Technoserve) technology, and works in partnership with local and international civil society organizations, journalists (Media Matters, Al Jazeera), and (socialist) governments”. Who determines the impartiality in these assessments? This is from a guy funded by a billionaire who purposely dismantles economies of sovereign nations for political control and financial enrichment, whose wife’s uncle is one of the biggest arms dealers in the world, and supports the Obama/Clinton/McCain perpetual war enablers. If “The Sentry” is so concerned about following the money that funds atrocities and crimes against humanity, it would start with Clooney and his ilk. Democrats project, though, so The Sentry is a Soros/Podesta backed initiative designed not only to make George Clooney look good and to deflect from his pals but to help agenda push which is why the next question that any sane person should ask is why did The Sentry target….Australia?
George and Don Cheadle held a big press conference Monday, September 12th, 2016, in Washington D.C. regarding the results of 2 years of Sentry “kleoptocracy” research. Their focus was…Australia. They said it was because “kleptocratic” leaders of South Sudan hid out and stored their money there. However, already noted related to Australia is George’s association with Australian author of the “Responsibility to Protect” Gareth Evans. Know what happened in Australiain 2014? The “boats stopped”. The Australian version of a “conservative right wing” party took over, led by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who stopped the “boats” of unvetted illegal immigrants. Clooney and company talked a good game about Sudan, but they were working to publicly shame Australia into opening its borders as public shaming is a part of their doctrine from “climate change” to “refugees” to “open borders” to “xenophobia”.
Vartan Gregorian (Carnegie Foundation)
Evans, Soros, Podesta and Prendergast covered satellites, “human rights” and the “Responsibility to Protect” for “refugees” as victims of “regime change”. Vartan Gregorian, Ruben Vardanyan and Sir Tom Hunter are involved in these areas, too, but focus more on the “education” and “hate specch” via “Islamaphobia” areas. There is a lot of overlap as all of these “humanitarian” organizations involve the same people, the same money, the same Newspeak, and the same outcome…to make them extremely wealthy.
Iranian Muslim Vartan Gregorian was the first non-native American citizen to become President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. While Mr. Carnegie’s primary aim was to benefit the people of the United States, Mr. Gregorian opened the wealth flow straight to the hotbed of African cronyism. Currently, “this area of Corporation grant making focuses on selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Coincidentally, Gregorian served on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded the aforementioned “Responsibility to Protect” act. As a “non-assimilated” Muslim, he also serves on a few prominent boards to help streamline the Muslim overthrow of America smoothing over their radical ideology that runs completely contradictory to western values through “Islamophobia”, the “refugee” crisis and “education”. He is the former President of Brown University as well as having served in high ranking positions at several other ivy league schools and is very involved in the Common Core curriculum of public schools in the United States In fact, he was one of the first high ranking education officials to use the term “Islamophobia” in terms of “hate speech” to silence detractors while undermining the first amendment.
According to a book review by the Middle East Forum, Gregorian’s book Islam: A Mosaic, Not a Monolith “establishes the Islamist goal of world domination.” A chapter of the book, “Islamism: Liberation Politics,” quotes Ayatollah Khomeini: “Islam does not conquer. Islam wants all countries to become Muslim, of themselves.” Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, is quoted stating it “is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” Gregorian himself recommends for Muslims a system he calls “theo-democracy,” which he defines as “a divine democratic government” that, according to the book review, “would have a limited popular sovereignty under the suzerainty of Allah.” Mr. Gregorian is thus very involved in shaping the image of Muslims in American especially since the September 11th attacks. WND reported Gregorian is closely tied to the Muslim leaders behind the controversial Islamic cultural center to be built near the site of the Sept. 11 attacks. Gregorian also serves on the board of the Sept. 11 Memorial and Museum. The museum is reportedly working with the American Society for Muslim Advancement, whose leaders are behind the mosque, to ensure the future museum will represent the voices of American Muslims. The Cordoba Initiative, which is behind the proposed mosque to be built about two blocks from the area referred to as Ground Zero, has the Carnegie Corporation, of which Gregorian is President, at the top of the list of society supporters on the Islamic group’s website. When asked about his involvement in these endeavors, he usually replies with some politically correct statement that promotes globalization. In reality what he is doing, and what his actions support, is shaming and silencing critics of Islam as he uses the “refugee crisis” to overrun the Christian majority populations of western nations.
One way Gregorian works to undermine the first amendment while silencing detractors is to identify “Islamophobia” and deem it “hate speech”. Although the term was coined in the 1990’s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Muslim Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations, including several headed by Vartan Gregorian, have pushed the notion that Americans are deeply prejudice against Muslims, even though FBI data on hate crimes show this not to be the case. In fact, “prejudicial crimes” against Muslims have actually shown to decrease since 9/11. However, globalists never let facts get in the way of an agenda pushing opportunity. This “Islamophobia” was designed to primarily eliminate the free speech protections guaranteed by our first amendment by declaring any negative language directed towards Islam unprotected “hate speech”. According to Discover the Networks: A Guide to the Political Left:
“The term ‘Islamophobia’ was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: ‘This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’ In short, in its very origins, ‘Islamophobia’ was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.
This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘General Strategic Goal for North America,’ by which the organization aimed to wage ‘a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.’ To implement this plan, the Brotherhood enlisted the help of 29 likeminded ‘organizations of our friends’ (one of which was IIIT), whose task would be to depict themselves as civil-rights groups speaking out on behalf of a Muslim American population that was allegedly besieged by outsiders who harbored an illogical, unfounded fear of them — i.e., by a society replete with ‘Islamophobia’.”
While at Brown University, Mr. Gregorian was one of the first university Presidents to expel a student for using “hate speech”. A drunken student yelled some questionable names at some other kids. The school deemed the words “unsafe” and, as such, the school felt the need to “balance free speech against freedom of fear”. No, that is not how the first amendment was designed to work. Mr. Gregorian was upset by news reports that suggested the student had been expelled because he violated university regulations governing speech. Gregorian said the rules proscribed behavior, not words, therefore it was fine. He was quite judicial with his language when he stated, “The day that Brown denies any student freedom of speech is the day that I give up my presidency of the university.” He did not give up his presidency when he should have, then, because he did deny a student’s right to free speech as protected by the first amendment. That is very subjective language and subjective interpretation of that language was used to kick that kid out of school. That was in 1991. Look where we are now. We live in an era of “safe zones” from “hate speech” on higher education campuses. “Free speech” means “the speech which the left authorizes”. Canada and the U.K. have passed bills criminalizing “Islamophobic hate speech”.
Similarly, Democrats in the U.S. are serious in using it to curtail our first amendment rights. House Resolution 569 was introduced on December 17, 2015 with “its self-described purpose is ‘condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States’.” Democrats have been trying to ban what they deem hate speech and now plan to exploit Muslims to achieve their goals as an excuse to put in laws that damage or destroy the First Amendment. Their first priority when retaking the House in 2019 was to pass a speech restricting bill opposed by even the Anti Civil Liberties Union. The legislation “purports to reform campaign finance with a series of vague, sweeping measures that will act to chill speech when they don’t actively regulate or squelch it. HR 1 is called the For the People Act but would be more aptly titled The Be Careful What You Say, It Might Be Illegal Act.” Of course, they use this an a opportunity to declare war on “big Citizen United type money” in politics in the form of donations and Super PACs, but as the Institute for Free Speech notes, “the bill affects a much broader array of ‘trade associations, unions, business groups and advocacy organizations, such as Planned Parenthood and the National Right to Life Committee’.” It would not affect “humanitarian” organizations that act as Super PAC’s like The Center for American “Progress” and Media Matters.
As for public education, Gregorian’s influence financially and philosophically go much deeper. Obama’s mentor, domestic Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, received $49.2 million in startup capital for an education-reform project from Vartan Gregorian, a board member of the Qatar Foundation, which, as reported in 2012, has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was started by the former Emir of Qatar and founder of Al Jazeera news network, Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani. Qatar has gained access to America’s K-12 students through other education programs as well. For example, Qatar Foundation International’s “flagship” Arabic Language and Culture program is offered in several US schools and districts. In addition, Gregorian is an integral part of “Connect All Schools”, through which Qatar invested $5 million to teach not just Arabic in American public schools but to clean up radical Islam’s image. For example, at Alice Deal Middle School in Washington, DC, students connected with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Syria for a lesson that examined “how the media in the U.S. stereotypes Muslims in a negative light.” Note the “image cleanup” involves American changing their tune, not Islam doing anything about its radicalism. In an effort to alert these schools to the fact that Qatar is a “pernicious sponsor of Islamic terror,” Col. Allen West, Frank Gaffney, Jr. of the Center for Security Policy, and Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, joined with several others to start the Qatar Awareness Campaign. According to the group: “Qatar is arguably the preeminent sponsor of terror in the world today. It is a benefactor of the genocidal armies of ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram; it is involved in Taliban narcotics trafficking through a relationship with the Pakistani National Logistics Cell; and profits from operating a virtual slave state. Qatar has leveraged its relationships with violent jihadi groups to its own benefit, and to the detriment of the United States and her allies.” Along with the Connect All Schools initiative, Gregorian has enabled Qatar’s access to America’s K-12 students to push their message.
In addition, former National Endowment for the Humanities Chairman Jim Leach seemed to use the NEA to “propagandize for the Obama administration’s wishful thinking about Islam”. Leach saw Obama’s much-vaunted Cairo speech as the blueprint for what the NEH should be doing, as he made clear in this fawning address to the Carnegie Corporation, and numerous Endowment initiatives followed, including the Bridging Cultures initiative, and the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf. Scott Johnson of Powerline notes, “Consider the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf that Leach foisted on the Endowment, with the support of a $1.2 million grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Carnegie is an organization run by Vartan Gregorian, under whose leadership Carnegie has become deeply invested in Islam-related initiatives”. Leach thus converted the NEH into a vehicle of propaganda because, upon further review, an NEH source familiar with the project has explained that the grant was awarded by Carnegie to the NEH with the unwritten (but completely understood) provision that there were to be “no books or voices critical of Islam and the dangerous Islamist tendencies within Islam.” Gregorian helps censor reading content through the power of the purse where his education grants are concerned. When asked about the exclusion, NEH political flack Eva Caldera stated those books were already “widely available.” This banning of books fits well with how the left supports “free speech” as long as it is speech of which they approve.
Chapter 3: Establishing Clooney’s “Humanitarianism” in Africa
On July 14, 2004, the “Save Darfur Coalition” was founded at the Darfur Emergency Summit at CUNY Graduate Center in NYC. In January of 2005, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and the Government of Sudan was signed. Somewhere in 2005, Clooney was chosen to head the UN “humanitarian efforts” in Sudan. Why? To help mold the “human rights” narrative needed to facilitate the use of the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, which was adopted by a UN World Summit in September of 2005. According to “George Clooney’s War: The Filmstar’s Activism in Sudan”, “A UN World Summit in 2005 adopted humanitarian
intervention – the “Responsibility to Protect”, or R2P – as official UN doctrine. R2P enshrined in international law both the reason and duty for humanitarian intervention. A nation would henceforth forfeit its sovereignty if it committed or was unable to prevent massive human rights abuses on its soil. In such circumstances, the outside world could, and must, take action to stem the disaster through diplomacy, sanctions or, if needed, military force.” The “R2P” calls for the use of global police force as such as the need determined by the UN. This article seeks to “clarify the current legal status of a particular aspect of the ‘responsibility to protect’ principle—the idea that bystander states have a collective responsibility to protect populations beyond borders from mass atrocities when host states fail to do so. It outlines the development of this idea and argues that, while the legal force of key international statements on the ‘responsibility to protect’ principle may be weak at best, the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission have offered bold declarations in recent years which do point towards the gradual development of legal duties for the extraterritorial protection of populations.” In effect, if the UN does not like the way a country is being run, it can claim it has a “responsibility to protect” it’s citizens from themselves and their government by suspending it’s’ sovereignty/borders and taking over. “Sovereignty”, “democracy”, “human rights”….these are just words used as language manipulation to appeal to the emotion of low informed voters to justify their wrongdoings.
It is not surprising, then, to find out that:
“Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has been described by its founders and proponents, including Soros, as promoting global governance while allowing the international community to penetrate a nation state’s borders under certain conditions. Libya regarded as test of global doctrine…
The joint U.S. and international air strikes targeting Libya are widely regarded as a test of Responsibility to Protect which is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege, but a responsibility.
According to the principle, any state’s sovereignty can be overrun, including with the use of military force, if the international community decides it must act to halt what it determines to be genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.
The term “war crimes” has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, which applied it to Israeli anti-terror operations in the Gaza Strip. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops.
An organization calling itself the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is the world’s leading champion of the doctrine.
Activist Gareth Evans, who sits on the global group’s advisory board, is widely regarded as the founder of the Responsibility to Protect principle. Evans is also President Emeritus of the International Crisis Group and later an Aurora Prize Selection Committee Member if Clooney’s “100 Lives”.
The first country-specific resolution to which this doctrine was referred by the UN was Darfur in 2006. Coincidentally, the first public appearance of Clooney and Soros financed Barack Obama was on April 27th of 2006 in Chicago for a “Save Darfur” rally. The energetic Senator and the handsome actor unite to stop genocide! push for the demise of Darfur’s sovereignty for financial gain. Remember, one of Soros’ hallmarks is to destabilize a region under the guise of some sort of “human rights” atrocities and then swoop into “save the day” by raping the natural resources of the area (normally oil), sucking the money out of the economy for his own pockets, and then leaving behind chaos in his path. It is no wonder, then, that John Prendergast appeared on the scene at this time, too, to work closely with Samantha Power as a “US advocate of intervention in Africa (who) had started his career as a humanitarian in Sudan, writing reports on the excruciating violence between rival southern militias for Human Rights Watch. Under Bill Clinton, he had worked at the National Security Council as Director for African Affairs and as an advisor to Susan Rice in the State Department. He would later work for the International Crisis Group “ where he acted as a bridge to the Hollywood elite.
John Podesta is also a co-founder of Clooney’s “Enough” project, his “charity” housed in George Soros’s Center for American “Progress”. He is also a Clinton lobbyist for Sberrbank CIB USA Inc, a subsidiary of Russia’s largest bank, and his Podesta Group was hired by the Alliance for Shared Values, part of the Islamic Gulen movement, a religious and social movement led by Fethullah Gulen, the man on whom Turkey’s Erdogan blamed
the recent coup attempt, who now resides in Pennsylvania. With his newly discovered passion for helping Africa in tact,, in 2006, Clooney and his father traveled to Darfur in April for the first time, and a subsequent documentary, A Journey to Darfur, was released. This is also, coincidentally the year that Clooney signed on with Nespresso which over the course of the next decade will make him very wealthy while procuring resources in South Sudan via the “R2P” for further wealth redistribution in the future.
In 2007, Prendergast and Gayle Smith, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, co-founded the “Enough” project, funded by Soros’ CAP. This project’s stated mission is to “end genocide and crimes against humanity. The Enough Project conducts research in several conflict areas in Africa including Sudan, the Congo, Somalia, and the areas controlled by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).” It also keeps tabs on resources. With this initiative, Prendergast became the Soros “humanitarian” bridge to the Hollywood elite, helping recruit Clooney (Sudan), Angelina Jolie (sexual violence in war zones), Matt Damon (water), Ben Affleck (Congo) and Don Cheadle (genocide and environment)”. Keeping in mind Brad Pitt co-founded the “Not On Our Watch” project with Clooney and Prendergast, it seems the Ocean’s 11 cast were almost handpicked to further the globalist
agenda. Furthermore, in October, Jeff Skoll, yes the same one from Participant Media, co-produced Darfur Now which was moderated by Melody Barnes, Executive Vice President for Policy for, you guessed it, the Center for American Progress. Clooney made an appearance in the film “Darfur Now” to lend it pop culture credibility. The Soros machine was in full-court press using Clooney’s Hollywood platform to push the “humanitarian” dissolution of a nation’s sovereignty if the UN deemed it so as a “human rights” issue.
In addition, Soros established at this time what he hoped would be the model for the balkanization and subsequent globalist takeover of the U.S. in “CAP California” which was designed “to advance and support a ‘progressive’ national policy agenda and lay out our vision of a ‘progressive’ America on the West Coast”. Look at ‘progressive’ California today—which as the home of Clooney and Hollywood should shock no one–massive debt, largest gap between rich and poor in the country, illegals over citizens, the Muslim invasion, strict gun control laws, and the speech restrictions as exemplified in the UC campus system. California has been considered a “progressive” success by Soros standards, not so much a success for “freedom”, “democracy”, and “human rights”, which must be eliminated for the elites to rule. As such, Soros decided to push the California “progressive success” model nationally with various “social justice” and “humanitarian” platforms to undermine U.S. sovereignty, three of which Clooney helps tremendously-the gay agenda, the green agenda, and the Muslim agenda.
Chapter 4: 2008-Hope & Change
2008 found Clooney on the Presidential campaign trail. During this year, he confirmed to the pop culture base as decided by Soros in 2006 that Hillary would not be the nominee, calling her the “most polarizing figure in politics” while somehow hypocritically convincing the public “patriarchal” Republicans hated women while pushing the race baiting Obama. In a 2009 document marked “classified”, George Soros’ Open Society Institute, called the Obama presidency a:
“’make or break’ moment for ‘transformative change’ in immigration reform, ‘racial justice,’ and a myriad of other issues. ‘We are living in a ‘make or break’ moment for building open society in America. There is no need to wax eloquent about why. The factors were not all in play even just a year ago,’ Ann Beeson and Bill Vanderberg wrote in a document titled “Special Funding to Seize This Transformative Moment.”
Beeson and Vendenberg wrote, “OSI should provide funding to strengthen the capacity of national groups focused on specific issues – racial justice, LGBT equality, women’s rights, and immigrants’ rights – to develop an over-arching equality agenda.” A group they identify as being able to take a “lead role in this effort” is the National Council of La Raza.
The memo points to John Podesta and Andy Stern as leaders in the Unity 2009 effort. It states that both “are well-connected with the new Administration and on the Hill.”
Perhaps George’s willingness to push this “fundamental transformation” combined with his UN globalist push (and a good word from Clooney/Soros crony John Podesta) is why he was rewarded with the UN Messengers of Peace title on January 18th.
Clooney continued the “hope and change” push via the Soros backed “gay agenda” (as proven by the DNC leaks ) this same year as prop 8, the bill banning same sex marriage, passed in California. The “gay agenda” was never about “equality”. It was always intended for and has been used to undermine religious liberty in hopes of taking down the first amendment because if it falls, the rest of our rights fall. As stated, California was the “successful” beta test for the Soros takeover. As such, California should have been a no brainer to pass prop 8 between Clooney, Hollywood and San Francisco, thus setting the base for future legislation via “democracy”. However, that did not happen. The Prop 8 vote saw 52.24% of voters saying yes to this measure. Those who disagreed with the vote but believed in “democracy” requested a second vote, not a tyrannical override. Even then, the people of California voted for prop 8 a SECOND time. . Outraged, Clooney dutifully took on the role of campaigner to overturn this measure because, as a globalist puppet, he could care less about “democratic” election outcomes and the sovereignty of a nation and its people. Irate, Clooney fought to overrule the voices of the people and celebrated when the tyrannical Supreme Court overturned their millions of votes while belittling those who voted for it…twice. Keep in mind, this is not a commentary on whether gay marriage should be legal or not. It is a reflection on how those who claim to be “pro-democracy” are not. Those paying attention realized at this point that “Mr. Everyman American” who claimed to be “pro-democracy” was anything but on both counts. Clooney then continued to spew CAP talking points wherever he could including but not limited to: withdrawing troops from Iraq, a plan to implement “universal” health coverage for all, and “green jobs” that would combat “global warming”. As we will soon discover, “the green scheme” is not only a second part of the globalist “take down America” platform but a lucrative one for both Georges, as well.
2008 was also a benchmark in his personal life, although the public had no clue. In August, talks began to have Clooney star in “Up in the Air”. Daniel Dubiecki was a producer of this movie. He is married to Lara Alameddine (an alternate spelling to Alamuddin). Yes, she is related to Amal. No one knows when Clooney actually met Amal. The PR love story narrative says September of 2013. He knew of her family long before that, though. Amal’s other cousin, Raya Meddine (she shortened the name professionally) joined “The Young and the Restless” in this year, too. There were at least two members of Amal’s family in Hollywood this year—Obama’s election year—and one of their husbands worked closely with Clooney. As a side, there is this shot from “Rana”’s Twitter account dated September 30th, 2014, wedding weekend as well as a more recent screenshot expressing her disdain for Israel:
Chapter 5: 2009-2010 Sudan & the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood
2009-2010 found Clooney busy with his Hollywood projects including Men Who Stare At Goats, Mr. Fantastic Fox and the aforementioned, critically acclaimed Up in the Air and just as busy for the globalists politically. In January, Clooney worked the “humanitarian” cause for those affected by the Haiti earthquake with his “Hope for Haiti Now” telethon. As with most of the money donated, whether forcibly through taxes paid to the UN or voluntarily, most of the money did not make it there. All that money got “fair-shared” per Nick Harvey at New Internationalist Magazine, “And while billions of dollars have undoubtedly managed to filter through, a lack of interaction between NGOs and locals means very little of it ends up in Haitian hands. Studies have shown that only 2.3 per cent of reconstruction aid went to Haitian firms. Haitians have, in many ways, simply been excluded from the rebuilding of their own country”. This past March, Haitian activists protested outside of the Clinton Foundation in NY over “billions of dollars” that went missing. Where did it all go? It bears mentioning that in 2011, Clooney shilled for the Clinton Foundation. It has since been revealed that the Clinton Foundation is nothing more than a slush fund for political favors. “Humanitarian” indeed.
However, the better part of the year saw “Humanitarian” Clooney stumping for support for the independence referendum in Sudan for “democracy”. During this time, CAP broadened their conquest map in Africa through the “Enough” initiative from Sudan/Darfur with the Satellite Sentinel Project which, “Through the use of satellite imagery, SSP provides an early warning system to deter mass atrocities by focusing world attention and generating rapid responses on human rights and human security concerns”. It also just so happens that in August of 2009 Soros was a shareholder in DigitalGlobal, the company Clooney uses to maintain his satellite project. Clooney eventually gets his kickbacks, though, through “climate change”. Hypocritical Hollywood pushes the “green scheme” agenda for political and personal favors, as discovered in this undercover video by James O’Keefe, while maintaining mega mansions around the world, including air conditioning, to which they travel on private jets, and others like Clooney use gas powered boats to get to their villas in Italy. They do not practice what they preach as the “green scheme” is not about the environment green but cash green.
Soros is a major player in the green scheme as the DNC leaks proved. First he paid Al Gore all that money to push the faux climate data. Then Soros made a lot of money off the taxpayer funded trillion-dollar federal stimulus via “climate change”, “in the first quarter of 2009, Mr. Soros went on a stock-buying spree in companies that ultimately benefited from the federal stimulus, including twelve alternative energy and utility companies… these twelve, and other timely investments in renewable energy, Soros’ green tab exceeds $11 BILLION of stimulus money.” Fast forward to this year as the Obama administration’s war on coal rages onward in favor of “sustainability”/cronyism. Soros, after driving down the price of coal, bought $2 million/1.5 million shares of coal stock so that when it goes up again, will make a financial killing after bankrupting what is left of the middle class whose electricity rates will become increasingly hard to pay. Clooney will, too, with his “sustainability” endeavors cloaked as “humanitarianism” in Africa as we will see later. Clooney and Soros believe that money is evil…unless it is theirs…and they are going to make a lot of it in the Sudan and the US as a result of “the green scheme” if they have their way.
Speaking of “evil money”, during this time, two of Clooney’s cohorts, John Podesta of the “Enough” project and Ruben Vardanyan of the “100 Lives” initiative, and Viktor Pinchuk , who tried to use the influential Americans he met through Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to free Yulia Tymoshenko, Amal Clooney’s eventual client, from jail, were involved in Hillary Clinton’s $35M Skolkovo deal, where they in essence sold US technology to the Russian military. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton “spearheaded U.S. involvement in a Russian government technology initiative called Skolkovo. The Russian government’s stated goal for Skolkovo, touted as ‘innovation city”, was to be the Russian equivalent of American’s Silicon Valley. Skolkovo housed more than 30,000 workers in state of the art facilities under Kremlin control. Despite the FBI and the US Army warning that Skolkovo could be used by Russia to accelerate its military technological capabilities, Hillary Clinton’s state department and her campaign manager developed alarming relationships with Kremlin controlled entities.” Keep in mind, another ‘role’ served by Podesta is as a Clinton lobbyist for Sberrbank CIB USA Inc, a subsidiary of Russia’s largest bank, and his Podesta Group was hired by the Alliance for Shared Values, part of the Islamic Gulen movement, a religious and social movement led by Fethullah Gulen, the man on whom
Turkey’s Erdogan blamed the recent coup attempt, who now resides in Pennsylvania. Somehow two co-founders of the joint Clooney flagship “charity” initiative is also tied to the area where the Clooneys are trying to re-establish their “humanitarian” brand—Armenia which is geopolitically important to both Russia and Turkey and, coincidentally, the focus of Clooney’s “100 Lives” initiative with Ruben Vardanyan and Noubar Afeyan, who was an advisory board member for Skolkovo from 2012-2014. Now let’s check some of the timeline bullet points for this Podesta/Russia transaction:
June 3, 2010 Russian Oligarch Ruben Vardanyan joined the board.
Jan 11 2011 Public announcement that Podesta was joining the Joule Unlimited Board of Directors
March 11, 2011 Klein Ltd Files corporate registration papers in Bermuda, with two Senior Wakefield Quin employees, Nicholas J Hoskins and Marlies Smith, as officers. Hoskins is associated with Troika Dialog and IPOC entities controlled by Russian oligarchs Ruben Vardanyan and Reinman. Smith is corporate secretary for Vimpelocm, run by Freidman and Pinchuk. The registration documents make clear the company’s sole purpose is to make charitable contributions.
2011-2012 Klein Ltd makes $23 million in contributions to the US based charity the Sea Change Foundation. Sea Change, in turn, makes $1.75 million in contributions to the Center for American Progress (where “Enough” is housed) during the same time. Sea Change had never contributed to CAP before.
Sep 23, 2011 It is announced that Rusanano will make an approximately $35 million investment to Joule Unlimited, which is a subsidiary of Joule Global Holdings NV
Dec 13, 2011 Rusanano’s board authorizes Anatoly Chubais to serve concurrently on the boards of both Joule Global Holdings, and Joule Global Foundation.
Feb 2, 2012 Joule Unlimited elects Anatoly Chubais to its Board of Directors.
Dec 2013 Podesta resigns from Joule boards.
Feb 21, 2014 Podesta financial disclosures signed. Does not list Joule Stichting on his disclosure.
The project has since denigrated rapidly:
“Today, precious little of that buzz remains. The political will and, more importantly, the financial capacity to encourage technological innovation are gone. Gone too is Medvedev himself, these days practically invisible outside Russia and eclipsed inside it, with President Vladimir Putin firmly back in the driver’s seat. Skolkovo was raided by anti-corruption agents in April 2013, after which several figureheads on the project were accused of misappropriation of funds. Although officials deny that the investigations were politically motivated, Skolkovo has tumbled down the government’s priority list: This year, the incubator was ordered to cut costs by 20 to 40 percent.”
Podesta oversaw this entire seemingly money laundering event under the guise of “charity” that was backed by Putin right hand man Ruben Vardanyan, Clooney sure is good at bringing on money launderers to help with his ‘charities”.
Also during the 2009/2010 time period, CAP also increased their hate rhetoric against Israel. In recent years, ThinkProgress has sparked controversy for its attacks on defenders of Israel and on critics of hardline Islamist ideology or “Islamaphobes”. For example, in 2010 a ThinkProgress posting by CAP policy analyst Matt Duss denounced an Israeli raid on a Free Gaza Movement flotilla that was challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza, a raid that resulted in the deaths of nine anti-Israel militants: “Like segregation in the American South, the siege of Gaza (and the entire Israeli occupation, for that matter) is a moral abomination that should be intolerable to anyone claiming progressive values.” CAP writer Eric Alterman, for his part, accused the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) of campaigning for a U.S. invasion of Iran, and ThinkProgress national-security reporter Eli Clifton wrote: “It would appear that AIPAC is now using the same escalating measures against Iran that were used before the invasion of Iraq.” Soros hates Israel and the U.S. The Soros DC Leaks confirmed was a major contributor to anti-Israel and anti-Zionist causes. Take, for instance, Adalah :
“The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, received a $400,000 grant in 2014-15 and 14 additional grants since 2001 totaling $2,688,561. The recently released document under the banner of the Movement for Black Lives, labeling Israel as an “apartheid state” and accusing Israel of committing “genocide” against Arabs, is the handiwork of Nadia Ben-Youssef, Adalah’s US representative, which the document lists as an “author and contributor.”
Incidentally, according to NGO Monitor, Adalah’s promotion of BDS directly contravenes the stated policies of its funder, the New Israel Fund (NIF). NIF’s position on BDS states that it “will not fund global BDS activities against Israel nor support organizations that have global BDS programs.” Nevertheless, from 2008-2015, NIF donated $1,975,826 to Adalah.
And, lo and behold, NIF is also listed as a recipient of Soros’ support, 9 grants totaling $837,500 since 2009. One of these grants, for $60,000, was given in 2015 to the Herman Schwartz Human Rights Law Fellowship, to “strengthen the capacities of young Palestinian legal professionals in legal advocacy by undertaking an LL.M. degree in human rights law in the US along with internships opportunities in Israel.”
Keep this rhetoric in mind when Clooney eventually marries.
Coincidentally, the mainstreaming of radical Islam in America was well underway as Obama appointed members of the Muslim Brotherhood to high-ranking government positions, and Brotherhood affiliated Huma Weiner became engaged to New York Democrat Congressman Anthony Weiner in 2009. Huma Weiner, a top advisor to Hillary Clinton and a pro-open borders advocate, is the daughter of Sahela Mahmood Abedin, a “sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief . This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al- Qaradawi.”
Rumors abounded at that time that Clooney tried to romance her. He denied it. However, his rep Stan Rosenfield did confirm they had met in 2008, the same year Lara Alameddine and Rana Meddine appeared on the scene. After a relatively short engagement, 2010 brought the wedding of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner. Billed as a “marriage of political minds”, one cannot help but see the parallels between this marriage and that of the Clooneys a few years later. As with Clooney, Weiner was billed as the playboy destined to never find “the one”. According to the NY Daily News, “Weiner, a longtime bachelor
linked to several local beauties, said last week that he’s ready to leave his single days behind. ‘I’m over the moon,’ he said.” Sound familiar? Even their “getting a first date” stories will prove eerily similar: “’He spoke of how they met and how she at first rejected him but that his determination would not let up,’ a source said”, almost identical to the Clooney story. Huma and Amal both wore an Oscar De la Renta gowns. Both couples have a large age difference (the Weiners is 12 years; Clooneys 14). Both were married by a far left progressive politicians (the Weiners by Bill Clinton; the Clooneys by Rome Mayor Walter Veltroni). Keeping in mind who he married, one might wonder if Clooney was Soros’ first choice.
Chapter 6: Egypt, Islamophobia, and the Responsibility to Protect
2011 saw Clooney continue on with the full Soros press, gearing up for the 2012 election year. First off, Clooney’s The Ides of March was released. In it, every single CAP talking point which had become an integral part of the Obama administration platform was reiterated by the democratic Presidential nominee played by Clooney from “fair share” to “fair shot” and , of course, all the Republican bashing the cast could muster. The Descendants also came out which contained any number of “green scheme” environmental references regarding the climate of Hawaii, Obama’s home state. As Clooney was appealing to the pop culture masses as “Mr. Everyman Democrat” who was working “for the people”, across the globe, his friends in Washington, who had already started putting members of the Muslim Brotherhood in power here and at the UN helped facilitate the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood via the vaunted “Arab Spring”. We know how “democracy” works for the globalists in the Middle East, though, so it is not surprising that the Brotherhood were forcibly put into power in Egypt as a minority: “On 11 February 2011 Vice President Omar Suleiman announced that Mubarak would resign as president… After the revolution against Mubarak and a period of rule by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, the Muslim Brotherhood took power in Egypt.” That did not last long as tens of millions of Egyptians took to the streets to protest the anti-gay, anti-woman, pro Sharia government and overthrew it. Morsi’s government “encountered fierce opposition from secularists and members of the military, and mass protests broke out against his rule in June 2013. On 3 July 2013, Morsi was deposed by a coup d’état led by the minister of defense, General Abdel Fattah El-Sisi,” This has not gone over well with the those who support radical Muslim extremism.
Coincidentally (or not), Soros started “opposition research” on certain critics of radical Islam. The 2011 document, entitled “Extreme Polarization and Breakdown in Civil Discourse,” lamented that progressive groups and members of the Arab, Middle Eastern, Muslim, and South Asian-American (AMEMSA) community lacked “high quality opposition research to combat anti-Muslim xenophobia and to promote tolerance. To close that gap, OSF sought to provide a $200,000 grant to CAP, which was founded in 2003 by Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta. The CAP project, called the Examining Anti-Muslim Bigotry Project, set out to engage progressives and journalists to raise awareness about the critics of radical Islam. OSF did fund CAP’s project. Its 2011 tax filings show that it gave CAP the $200,000 grant as well as two others totaling $500,000.” Reads very much like paying the press to “control the narrative”. By all accounts “Islamophobia” was not an issue here or in Europe at the time. This is a set up to the planned invasion of Europe and the U.S. via the “refugee crisis” that Soros and his minions will come to manipulate later.
This “Islamophobia” was not only a setup for the open borders push we are seeing now. It was also set up to eliminate free speech and our first amendment. According to Discover the Networks: A Guide to the Political Left:
“The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.
This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal for North America,” by which the organization aimed to wage “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.” To implement this plan, the Brotherhood enlisted the help of 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” (one of which was IIIT), whose task would be to depict themselves as civil-rights groups speaking out on behalf of a Muslim American population that was allegedly besieged by outsiders who harbored an illogical, unfounded fear of them — i.e., by a society replete with “Islamophobia.” ”
Although the term was coined in the 1990’s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations, including several headed by Clooney co-hort Vartan Gregorian, and Muslim civil rights activists groups have pushed this notion that Americans are deeply prejudice against Muslims, even though FBI data on hate crimes show this not to be the case. In fact, “prejudicial crimes” against Muslims have actually shown to decrease since 9/11. The globalists never let facts get in the way of a good hate platform to agenda push, though.
Therefore, in 2011, CAP issued a 132 page report titled Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America. This publication’s stated objective was to “expose and marginalize the influence of the ‘sinister’, ‘hateful’, ‘purposely deceptive’, ‘bigoted’, and ‘racist’ individual groups that, according to CAP, are part of an “Islamophobia network in America”. These include what CAP describes as ‘misinformation experts’, ‘anti-Muslim bigot’, ‘political players’, ‘right wing media’, ‘religious right zealots’, and ‘radical ideologues’ who intentionally ‘mischaracterize Islam’, ‘peddle hate and fear of Muslims’ and ‘rave about the overhyped dangers’ of Sharia, so as to ‘fan the flames of Islamophobia’. As with other “socially just” language, interpretation of these terms is completely subjective meaning they can be used against anyone at anytime for any reason. This idea takes the whole language manipulation of the whole “conservatives hate everyone” mantra of the Good Night and Good Luck years and now expands it to anyone who questions, especially after 9/11 amid the “refugee” crisis with the rise of ISIS, created by the vacuum left behind in the Middle East when the “R2P” was implemented, unvetted Muslims in their neighborhoods.
How does this tie to Clooney? Look at the family into which he married. In marrying Amal, Clooney has brought radical Islam to the masses as acceptable. If it is good enough for him, “Mr. Everyman American”, then it should be good enough for us. As we will see, many of the cases Amal’s name is eventually tied to involves Muslim Brotherhood members, Soros, her family, or any combination thereof. In addition, Amal’s mother, Baria Alamuddin, a Sunni Muslim and well-respected Al Jazeera journalist based in England speaks out very negatively against Israel while supporting Hamas and other such organizations even going so far as to refer to Yasser Arafat as a “family friend”. In the Doha Debate in November 2009, she said of Israel: “The last thing I will ever do in my life is protect Israel or defend Israel. I’m Lebanese, I left my country, I live in the UK since… I left my beloved country since 1982, I live in the UK courtesy of an Israeli invasion of my country, and Israel still invades my country whenever it pleases. You think I defend Israel?… Israel should not have a nuclear weapon, they should get rid of nuclear weapons today.”
In addition, Baria owns the PR firm Globell Communications, which supposedly represents Amal, and explains the ease with which narratives regarding the Clooneys are created and formed in the media. She is also the foreign editor of al–Hayat, a Pan-Arab newspaper which is not above mocking the suffering of 9-11 victims with innumerable callous cartoons. A 2007 “Al-Hayat” sketch depicted Osama bin Laden grinning while making the “V” for victory sign with two fingers formed like the blazing Twin Towers. A 2002 cartoon showed legs shaped like an “11” chasing Uncle Sam and captioned “September.” Another caricature showed a Muslim praying for the death of Americans. The prayer was portrayed as missiles, reading “Allah scatter them!” “Turn their wives into widows!” “Turn their children into orphans!” Additionally, Al-Hayat Media Center (if affiliated) also publishes Dabiq, a slick magazine for ISIS recruiting & propaganda. However, point out any of her politics and how they, she, and/or any of her family work directly against the west and expect calls of “racism” (even though it is an ideology not a race).
The 2011 Islam push in the U.S. continued with Soros and the UN in a number of ways. First off, in September of 2011, Soros looked to expand his operations in Egypt via the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which is run in partnership with the Open Society Justice Initiative. The group seeks to develop a national network of legal empowerment actors for referral of public-interest law cases. Such organizations in the past have helped represent Muslim Brotherhood leaders seeking election or more authority in the country. In addition, the George Soros-funded Social Science Research Council, along with the Edward R. Murrow (think Good Night and Good Luck) College of Communication at Washington State University, received $50,000 from the Open Society Institute as one of the groups behind a new course on Islam designed for journalists which tries to minimize the impact and importance of ”jihad” by comparing it to the number of murders in America each year.
That same course in keeping with language manipulation for narrative pushing claims ”right-wing activists” tried to tie American Muslims to terrorism and does not mention examples of Islamic attacks on press freedom. That fits with a theme for liberal financier Soros, who has spent more than $52 million on influencing the media. The Islamic course also links to another Soros-funded entity, the well-financed Center for American Progress.” In about 30 pages of text with links to other reports and articles, journalists can go through and read about the history of Islam, Muslims in America, and how to cover stories on Islam. Besides learning basic facts about Muslims and their history, the course adds ways to put ”jihad” into perspective, attack conservatives, and provide a list of liberal groups that can be contacted for expert advice and quotes.” The manipulation of the press/media to formulate the west as Islamophobes, especially in America by Soros based entities, has gone full throttle with the Clooneys who claim to be for “freedom of speech and freedom of the press”. As with “democracy”, no they are not…unless it suits their politics.
The cornerstone event of the UN/Soros plan to take over the world culminated this year when the “Responsibility to Protect” was used to overthrow Qaddafi, who has close ties to Amal and her family. President Obama appointed Clooney pal Samantha Power as Special Assistant to the President in the State Department and a Senior Director at the National
Security Council and made Susan Rice ambassador to the UN. In 2011 Rice and Power led the argument inside the White House in favor of attacking Libya to “protect civilians”. The UN decided Libya was not governing the way it liked, so it “erased” its borders and went to “help”. In return, they expected complete control of the country’s resources, most notably oil. Unfortunately, Libya has turned into a homebase of sorts for ISIS as the country has fallen apart and created a vacuum in which such groups can thrive. Sounds much like the circumstances of another African nation with which Clooney had close ties-Sudan. We know how that worked out. Libya seems on much the same course.
As the fall of Qaddafi was being arranged in Libya via Clooney’s politics, he was on hand in Sudan for the same event cloaked as a great show of “democracy” with the “independence referendum”. He told fabulous stories of watching an elderly woman voting for the first time ever because “democracy” this and “democracy” that, which was laughable considering how he really feels about true “democracy”. In any event, the split occurred, and “On paper, independence might have ushered in a prosperous future. The South owns most of Sudan’s oil. It is also blessed with millions of hectares of fertile land around the vast Sudd swamp. Cows, worth $250-400 a head, outnumber people. For the humanitarians, this was a place to start from scratch and finally prove their case with their purest, most ambitious project to date: the creation of an entirely new country. The ministers’ prime focus seemed to be dividing up oil revenues among themselves. In 2011, several diplomats told me the government had stolen $14bn in oil money since 2005. That didn’t stop the south from attacking the north in 2012 and trying to steal what oil remained on the other side of the border ” Did Clooney, “Mr. Lover of Peace and Democracy” not think this through? Maybe. Maybe not. The oil, however, had been procured for the elites and later we will see how Clooney makes out financially as a result with regards to “sustainability”. In addition, in October of 2011, CAP hosted a panel discussion on LGBT families for the Family Equity Council. By this time, activist judges across the country had starting overturning the votes of tens of millions of people, declaring gay marriage bans “unconstitutional”, because true democracy-and our Constitution-must fall for the elites to rule. The three pillars of the globalist platform supported and pushed by Clooney for United States takedown was in full swing.
For his “real” profession in 2011, George Clooney was at the Toronto Film Festival promoting The Ides of March. So, surely coincidentally, was Mohamed Nasheed, former Muslim Brotherhood backed President of the Maldives, to support Jon Shenk’s ‘The Island President’, which chronicled Nasheed’s campaign to fight “global warming”. Funny how by this time Amal’s relatives were in Hollywood, one co-produced a Clooney movie, and a future “human rights client” of “hers” managed to hang with George at a film festival. However, she has not appeared on the Clooney public radar yet. That would soon change, though, as the globalists needed a pop culture, public relations Muslim face to put on their Islamophobia platform.
Chapter 7: 2012 Obama’s Re-Election Year
2012 U.S. Presidential election year. All of these seemingly unrelated points start to come together through Clooney. First date? February 7th is when Daniel Dubiecki & Lara Alameddine launched The Allegiance Theater. Their first film? Money Monster set for release in April of 2016. Who is starring in that? George Clooney. Coincidence, surely. On March12th, Clooney rubbed the tyrannical gay agenda prop 8 “victory” in the faces of the “democratic” voters of the Christian nation which has provided him with so much when he starred as David Boies, the attorney who argued against California voters, in Dustin Lance Black’s Play “8” which is the reenactment of the federal trial that overturned CA’s ban on SSM. He was also arrested this month outside the Sudanese Embassy in Washington D.C. for “civil disobedience” regarding the “genocide” in the Sudan.
On May 8th, CAP gave Obama permission to “come out” on gay marriage, and the very next day he announced his support after, like Hillary, being against it before it was politically expedient to be for it. Then, on May 11th, he flew to Hollywood where the party of “get big money out of politics” was more than pleased to have the entertainment media tout “Starmaggeddon” when George Clooney held a FIFTEEN MILLION DOLLAR fundraiser at his house for Obama’s re-election. Later in the month, on May 23, the retail chain Target unveiled a new line of pro-gay marriage apparel for “National Pride Month” with 100% of the proceeds going to the Family Research Council. It bears mentioning that George Soros bought 500,000 shares of Target stock in the fall of 2011. Coincidence, surely. In September, Clooney took an auction winner out to lunch to benefit the GLEN. Then…Benghazi.
Clooney seemed torn on this event when he said from a red carpet event on October 11 regarding the YouTube video that was blamed for the administration’s incompetence: “I’m not quite sure that those diplomats did die as a result of that movie. It seems more like that was a coordinated effort by Al Qaeda” which, of course, it was. Not only that, it was later proven that the administration knew of the impending attack ten days before it occurred and did nothing. However, Obama had an election to win, so Mr. “Je Suis Charlie” Clooney ran with the YouTube video talking point and used the incarceration the innocent man who made this video as an opportunity to trash the first amendment/free speech when he continued, “and that’s the unfortunate thing. ..But the simple truth is that in order to make (democracy) work, the idiots get to have their say, too. And that’s unfortunate”.
Amazing that no “human rights” were violated as an innocent YouTube producer sat in prison to help Obama win re-election proving once again Clooney’s “selective outrage” for all things “humanitarian” is only relevant when politically expedient. Clooney made this profound statement during a red carpet premier for “Argo”, a critically acclaimed box office success, which received brushback from various countries regarding the roles they played in the rescue of these Americans from Iran. As with all the narrative twisting in Hollywood for political and financial gain, Ben Affleck defended this intentional misrepresentation by saying, “Because we say it’s based on a true story, rather than this is a true story, we’re allowed to take some dramatic license” especially when “good friend” Huma Abedin was “instrumental” in the making of said movie.. Again…free speech is great…as long as it is approved…even if it is false, as has already been seen with Good Night, Good Luck. This takes us to 2013…the year Amal enters the picture to tie everything together.
Chapter 8: Enter Amal
What do we know about Amal Clooney? Yes, the PR dossier claims she is a strong, fierce, independent international “human rights” lawyer who snagged one of the most notorious bachelors of all time. However, that statement is incredibly misleading depending on language interpretation. While difficult to prove as her entire past seems wiped from the internet, almost as if she were born in 2013 when she hit Clooney’s scene, there are a few deductions one can make after connecting the dots between her caseload and her family, most notably that this is an arranged marriage to facilitate the final step towards global rule by the UN, specifically by George Soros via “Islamophobia” and “controlled speech”, and that Amal and her family are NOT our friends.
Amal Ramzi Alamuddin (Alameddine) was supposedly born in Beirut, Lebanon in February of 1978. When she was two, her family supposedly fled the “war torn” area and arrived in London, England as “refugees”. This idea that she is some “poor refugee” from “war torn Lebanon” is a journalistic stretch at best. Was there a civil war? Yes. Did she come to the UK destitute and work her way up from poverty? All signs point to no. Her family was considered well off in Lebanon: “a government minister and the founder of Lebanon’s airline were among their relatives, and they settled in a comfortable home in Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire”. Gerard’s Cross, was named the second richest town in England by The Telegraph in 2013, the year she appeared on the Clooney PR scene. Consider the high school she attended, Dr. Challoner’s, is a private school where the tuition runs currently as “£4322 for a junior term and £6970 for a senior Term”. From there she went to St. Hugh’s, an Oxford college, from where she graduated in 2000. St Hugh’s was sued in 2013 for choosing applicants based on their ability to pay, meaning the school only takes students from wealthy families. The school did not deny this. It seems Amal has enjoyed the 1% lifestyle afforded to her in the west for most, if not all, of her life.
In 2001, Amal entered the NYU School of Law where she received the Jack J. Katz Memorial Award for excellence in entertainment law. How apropos. Eventually, she clerked at the International Court of Justice, which becomes important later where the “Responsibility to Protect” and “Restrain the Veto” initiatives promoting the elimination of national borders for UN governance. For one semester while at NYU, she worked as a student law clerk in the offices of current Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, which provides us
with an early connection of Amal to Soros and the “open borders” push. Sotomayor appeared before the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, a left-wing group funded by Soros’ Open Society Institute. In fact, Soros recommended her for SCOTUS. Accordingly, Sotomayor wrote the foreword for The International Judge where, according to an analyst on the Foreign Policy magazine website, “Sotomayor took what seems to be a positive view toward the construction of international courts and legal institutions.” Her rulings suggest that she “sides with those who believe that foreign case law should at least be considered” as Sotomayor rules heavily in favor of Soros’s “open borders society” over national sovereignties. This might be due to their ideological commonalities in putting the 1% globalists over citizens of sovereign nations. It might also be due to the money George Soros throws at impending immigration rulings to help tilt the result to his liking such as the recent SCOTUS ruling involving Obama’s illegal executive amnesty: ““Grantees are seeking to influence the Justices (primarily via a sophisticated amicus briefs and media strategy) in hopes of securing a favorable ruling in U.S. v Texas,” the memo notes. A “favorable ruling” from the Court would have upheld President Obama’s executive order, a scenario which the organization was preparing for, according to the memo. No doubt they were expecting a position outcome based on the money spent and the death of Justice Scalia.
Amal supposedly completed her studies in 2002 and passed the New York State Bar the same year. She then supposedly worked in corporate law at Sullivan and Cromwell in NYC before heading back to the International Court of Justice in 2004. Here she worked under Judge Vladen S. Vereshchetin from Russia and Judge Nabil Elaraby from Egypt who eventually became the Arab League chief where he urged Arab countries to take a “’firm stand’ against Israel’s demand for Palestinians to recognize it as a Jewish State. Elaraby also supported the overthrow of Mubarak in lieu of the Muslim Brotherhood backed Morsi, and normalized relations with Iran because, according to him, “Iran is not the enemy.” Telling as many of the cases Amal attaches her name to later on are linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. It is safe to say, however, that Amal Clooney is nothing that her PR dossier says. She is as anti-Israel, anti-west, pro-UN/1% rule as the globalists who control Clooney.
In 2005, the same year Clooney seemed “chosen” to represent the UN “humanitarian efforts” in Sudan, Amal Alamuddin became part of a United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon which was established to prosecute those responsible for the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafic Hariri. Was this due to her fabulous lawyering skills? Questionable as she had no discernable professional track record on which to base her position. However, one of the executive committee members for the STL was George Soros and nepotism runs deep with Amal, especially where her Uncle Ziad is concerned. Franco-Lebanese Arms dealer Ziad Takieddine did business with Hariri through France in a deal that went awry and ended up with Hariri dead. As such, “On 13 December 2005, the Government of the Lebanese Republic requested the United Nations to establish a tribunal of an international character to try all those who are alleged responsible for the attack of 14 February 2005 in Beirut that killed the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and 22 others”. Getting his niece on a UN sponsored panel supported by Soros that focused on the death of a specific individual with whom he did business was one way to get “justice” while sending a message, but what message as she was relatively inexperienced and not well known?
To understand how many of Amal’s early cases stem from nepotism, one must know more background on her arms dealer uncle Ziad Takieddine, a Franco-Lebanese businessman who has been implicated in some of the nation’s biggest arms scandals. In addition to the one already mentioned, he was, according to Etienne Rouillon of Vice News, “an alleged middleman in the Karachi affair, a series of kickbacks connected to submarine contracts between France and Pakistan. The contracts allegedly financed the 1995 presidential campaign of former prime minister Édouard Balladur. Sarkozy was budget minister and Balladur’s spokesman at the time of the Karachi affair, and was investigated for his role in the affair. Arfi described Takieddine as a businessman leaving behind numerous traces of unofficial dealings between France and Libya”. Telling considering the current state of Libya/Benghazi. “What we discovered is that the man we thought was tied to one era and one scandal — the Balladur era and the Karachi scandal — became more and more professional as time went on,” Arfi said. “From the mid ’90s to the Sarkozy presidential election, he became the common thread [through all the scandals] that exposed the dark side of Sarkozyism…Mr. Takieddine was supposed to receive 350 million euros in secret commission fees,” Arfi told VICE News. “But Chirac stopped the deal from going ahead, prompting the need for a new business El Dorado… which turned out to be Libya”. According to Mediapart, members of the Chirac administration — including Sarkozy’s team — helped Takieddine “win contracts with the Libyan regime,” then under the control of Qaddafi. In addition, Takieddine had an alleged role in a reported transfer of 50 million euros from former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s regime to French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s 2007 election campaign. However, in March of 2011, as Sarkozy was spearheading an international campaign to impose a no-fly zone over uprising-hit Libya, Gaddafi’s eldest son, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi told Euronews TV that his father had indeed financed Sarkozy’s 2007 election campaign, lamenting, “He’s disappointed us,” said Saif al-Islam Gaddafi before declaring, “Give us back our money.” Eventually Saif-al-Islam, Lockerbee bomber/terrorist, became a client of Ziad’s niece, Amal.
In addition to family retribution, Washington planned on using the STL against Lebanon and Syria for regime change (via the “Responsibility to Protect”) or voluntary subordination (via “Restrain the Veto”). Although such invasions would be presented as “humanitarian” to protect the “human rights” of the innocent civilians, that is not the case. If it were, these same people would use their public platforms to call out ISIS and those responsible for the murder of thousands of other Lebanese over time. Instead Baria Alamuddin, Amal’s mother, who worked as a journalist for many years for the Qatar based, Hamas funded Al Jazeera network, was on Frost Over the World in June of 2007, “to offer her opinion on the (Lebanon) tribunal and whether it will offer closure for the Lebanese, and possibly vindication for Syria, or whether a decision taken by an outside force rather than an internal consensus could just result in more problems for Lebanon.” No mention that her legal eagle daughter was part of that tribunal for which she advocated her own version of the “responsibility to protect” via “outside force”.
Flash forward to 2016 where there is now verification that the “document in which Libyan leader (Qaddafi) pledges to donate £42million to bring former French President (Sarkozy) to power is genuine meaning claims that the 61-year-old former president of France was in the pay of the former Libyan dictator, and then turned against him during the Arab Spring revolution of 2011”. Amal’s uncle, Ziad Takeddine, was the go-between France and Libya negotiating these deals. This revelation has huge significance, especially in Britain, because “it was the RAF who assisted the French airforce in bombing Gaddafi’s dictatorship into oblivion…. Prime Minister David Cameron has always claimed the UK went to war against Gaddafi for purely humanitarian reasons”. Turns out they did not as this development suggests Mr. Sarkozy may have wanted Gaddafi killed in 2011 because he feared evidence of their ‘financial arrangement’ being made public. Remember the Clooneys supported the “Responsibility to Protect” Act which allowed the UN to overthrow Qaddafi as the “humanitarian” crisis Cameron and Sarkozy claimed it was. Surely they knew nothing of this agreement in which her uncle was a major player? This has, of course, resulted in disaster for the country, Benghazi and the rise of ISIS. In addition, the recently released final report from the House Select Committee on Benghazi reveals that not only did Obama and Hillary support taking out Gaddafi, they sent no one to help our guys when a pre-planned Al Qaeda attack on our embassy resulted in the death of four Americans. Know who did attempt to help them? Gaddafi loyalists. Yes, those loyal to the guy the Obama admin deposed still managed to find a sense of humanity to help Americans under attack by terrorists. Amal’s uncle brokered the arms deal that lead to it, meaning he is partially responsible for not only aiding the rise of ISIS but making money off it. This falls right in line with the Clooneys and their handlers/political partners as warmongers for financial and political gain as ‘humanitarians”.
Chapter 9: Pre Clooney
What Amal did from 2005-2010 is almost a mystery. No professional or personal information of great significance appears to be had; however, we can trace events leading to her current push as a pop culture icon to cover her politics during this time. 2008 was an important year personally where Clooney was concerned. In August, talks began to have Clooney star in Up in theAir. Daniel Dubiecki was a
producer of this movie. He is married to Lara Alameddine. Yes she is related to Amal. No one knows when Clooney actually met Amal. The PR love story narrative says October of 2013. He knew of her family long before that, though. Amal’s other cousin, Raya Meddine (she shortened the name professionally and also sometimes goes by Alamuddin) joined “The Young and the Restless” in this year, too. There
were at least two members of Amal’s family in Hollywood this year—Obama’s election year—and one of their husbands worked closely with Clooney. Not only that, Rana was at their wedding. There were candid shots of friends/family on her Twitter feed that have since been removed. Might be a stretch, but this was also about the time that George met Huma Abedin. Stan Rosenfeld confirmed they met but denied they dated. Either way, she found herself in whirlwind engagement and marriage to a politically connected individual that would come to eerily resemble the Clooneys later. Who knows…maybe George was her first pick?
Professionally during this time period, in 2006, Julian Assange, who she will later represent, established WikiLeaks, George Soros started the press for regime change in Turkey, Jared Cohen, a future co-worker, published One Hundred Days of Silence: America and the Rwanda Genocide, and the Muslim Public Affairs announced Syrianna would receive its 15th Annual Media Award for its positive portrayal of Muslims. In addition, her Uncle Ziad arranged for Libyan President Gaddafi to visit France as Ziad was “in charge of arrangements” where French President Nicolas Sarkozy received $42 million from Gaddafi for his 2007 re-election, All of this plays out with her later when she goes from playing at lawyering for her chamber, the globalists, and the UN and using her and Clooney for public pressure/publicity purposes to fulfill their agendas.
In 2010, Alamuddin emerged in London to work as a barrister for Doughty Street Chambers. By this time she did not have any wins under her belt nor led any cases; however, she “assisted” on many of them. At some point, she worked at the Soros sponsored International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, another area he helped to balkanize with Amal’s indirect help: “(Soros) spent up to $100 million on activists campaigning against the president of Serbian-dominated Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevic. After NATO’s “victory”, Soros gave money to the United Nations’ new International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and paid for training for its judges and prosecutor. He also paid two American law faculties to help the prosecutor find evidence against Serbia’s suspected war criminals — and Milosevic.” Unfortunately, long after Milosevic died, in March of 2016, this same Tribunal exonerated him:
“Milosevic, the tribunal ruled in late March, wanted to prevent the breakup of Yugoslavia, and while he initially supported Bosnian Serb leaders to that end, there is no evidence he was part of a “joint criminal enterprise” to victimize Muslims and Croats.
“Based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular Milosevic’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by … the Bosnian Serb leadership, the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milosevic agreed with the common plan” to forcibly remove Muslims and Croats from territory claimed by Bosnian Serbs.
Indeed, Milosevic “openly criticized Bosnian Serb leaders … (for) committing ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘ethnic cleansing.’ ” No doubt, Milosevic would have appreciated those words. Only he wasn’t around to hear them. After losing power in 2001, a new pro-Western Serbian government turned him over to the ICTY. Then Canadian Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour, acting as tribunal prosecutor at the time, indicted him as a war criminal. He spent five years locked up, only to die of heart failure in 2006 in the midst of his trial.”
As long as the regime Soros wants overthrown comes to fruition, it matters not who is unfairly blamed or if democracy suffers. The Clooneys prove over time to be right in line with this pro-globalist thinking. Perhaps that is why many of the other cases on which she “assisted” during this time were tied to either her family, Soros/the globalists, or both and found her defending human rights violators, not the “human rights” of the actual poor and downtrodden, as a cover for regime change.
One such human rights violator was Saif-al-Islam Gaddafi “was negotiating with the United States in order to conclude a comprehensive agreement making any further payments for American victims of terror attacks that have been blamed on Libya – such as the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing, the 1988 Lockerbie bombing and the 1989 UTA Flight 772 bombing – conditional upon U.S. payment of compensation for the 40 Libyans killed and 220 injured in the 1986 United States bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi”. On 14 August 2008, the U.S.-Libya Comprehensive Claims Settlement Agreement was signed in Tripoli. However, in a BBC TV interview, Gaddafi said that “Libya had admitted responsibility (but not “guilt”)
for the Lockerbie bombing. He further admitted that Libya was being “hypocritical” and was “playing on words”, but Libya had no other choice on the matter. According to Gaddafi, a letter admitting “responsibility” was the only way to end the economic sanctions imposed on Libya. When asked about the $10m (£5.3m) compensation that Libya was paying to each victim’s family, he again repeated that Libya was doing so because it had no other choice. He went on to describe the families of the Lockerbie victims as “trading with the blood of their sons and daughters” and being very “greedy”. “They were asking for more money and on of a wealthy dictator, but the British taxpayer is footing his defense bill. Eventually, John Jones, the male equivalent of Amal Clooney at Dougherty Street Chambers. In fact, he worked on many of the same cases to which her name was attached including Saif Qaddafi, Julian Assange and Mustafa Badreddine, accused of killing Lebanon’s prime minister Rafik Hariri in 2005. However, in September of 2015 Jones “withdrew from representing the defendant”. Six months later, in April 2016 John Jones
“committed suicide”, in May, Badreddine, a key Assad ally and enemy of the U.S. and Israel, was killed in an explosion in Damascus, and two months after that, in July 2016, Saif Qaddafi, Lockerbie bomber terrorist and intentional killer of many innocent women and children, was not only spared the death penalty; he was released. And then Assange starting releasing leaks about Hillary. More on that later…. All of this coincidental, surely….
Then there is Gaddafi’s partner, Abdullah Senussi. According to The Guardian newspaper, “Senussi had a reputation for brutality since the 1970s. During the 1980s he was head of internal security in Libya, at a time when many opponents of Gaddafi were killed.” There is no doubt that he was part of Gaddafi’s regime, and accused of human rights violations and terror. The 62-year-old’s past history includes a suspected involvement in the Abu Selim prison massacre. And in the Telegraph, “Most notorious for Libyans is the allegation that he gave the order for the massacre of 1,200 political inmates in Abu Salim prison in 1996. His notoriety has spread to Europe. For Britain, he will long be remembered for his involvement in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing in which 270 people were killed. The French will remember him for his role in masterminding the bombing of a French airliner over Niger in 1989 in which 170 people were killed. That led to a 1999 case in which he was convicted in absentia in France. He has been unable to travel abroad freely since then. His council says this conviction is a violation of his human rights and has asked for a trial in the Hague.” Amal Clooney is currently representing this terrorist with ties to her uncle, claiming his “human rights” are being violated. The “human rights” of those who terrorized, including the270 innocent lives lost, including children, in the Lockerbie bombing? The west deserved it.
Who else is Amal affiliated with professionally pre-Clooney whose “humanitarian” actions are questionable at best? King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa of Bahrain where the ruling family’s hold on the judicial process has “increasingly taken a turn for the worse, with no end in sight for the prosecution of high-profile government critics, a curtailing of the right to any meaningful form of protest or assembly and an escalating
human rights abuse record, which includes rampant, unabated torture”, according to Human Rights Watch. These “human rights” concerns halted a pay for play arms deal between the Crown Prince of Bahrain and Hillary Clinton’s State Department in 2011 which started after a meeting in 2009 when Clinton’s State Department ‘significantly increased arms export authorizations to the country’s autocratic government, even as that nation moved to crush pro-democracy protests,’ the International Business Times reports. Throughout her tenure as secretary, Clinton’s State Department gave the green light to sell $630 million worth of arms to Bahrain’s military — a huge increase from $219 million worth of weapons the United States sold to the country between 2006-2008. The increase coincided with the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011…” One such recently released individual has had to suffer two years of solitary confinement in dire conditions and face routine prison mistreatment for his verbal crimes is human rights activist Nabeel Rajab. He
appeared on the RT-sponsored Julian Assange interview show in 2012 to share how he had been “kept naked in his cell with a dead animal for company. He hoped for some changes to occur, but instead believes the absolute opposite has occurred during his imprisonment.” Yes this is the same Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, who is currently represented by Amal Clooney. It is quite coincidental that many of the “pay to play” activities of the Clinton Foundation, which Assange uncovered and for whom George shilled, tie to Amal’s “career”.
Chapter 10: The Clooneys—“Power” Couple
“Defender of terrorists, human rights violators, and people who hate the west” obviously could not be used to sell Amal to the masses, so in August of 2013 Amal appeared on the pop culture scene as Britain’s “hottest woman barrister”. Based on what criteria is a mystery due to a lack of any professional accomplishments and what anyone knew of her at the time; however, it pushed her into the mainstream, and the terms “hottest barrister” and “human rights attorney” became her two PR tags. The Clooney PR story stated that just after this announcement, George met Amal and pursued her with a vengeance. However, the PR events of the “greatest love story of all time” do not match what appears to be reality. It has been noted that Clooney knew of her family long before this time. Initially it was reported that the two had dinner in May of 2013 in London, but those reports have disappeared off the internet. It can, however, be proven that they were in London at the same time. Clooney, who was in England filming “The Monuments Men” dined at Loulou’s in London on May 26th with “friends” including former flame Monika Jakisic, who, it seems, was used as a red herring to distract from the Amal/George pairing. That same week, Amal organized the launch for Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen’s, both Soros co-horts on the
Council for Foreign Relations, book “The New Digital Age” at the same Loulou’s in London two nights later on May 28th. September, however, was given as the “official” date to the public when they supposedly met at some “humanitarian” function. Keep in mind how this rhetoric rings similar to the Weiner/Abedin courting story as in “she “did the unthinkable,” an insider says, and “walked away from the group George was with…. he asked her out on a date, she declined once again. “He was absolutely shocked,” the insider says. The Daily Mail‘s sources say she ultimately turned down two dates. But Clooney eventually convinced her to go out with him”. Much like the Weiner/Abedin “love story”, the “handsome” playboy “met his match”. Like Weiner, Clooney supposedly pursued her and, like Huma, Amal supposedly turned him down. Both couples were married in a relatively short time after their engagements by prominent progressive politicians. Both brides wore Oscar De La Renta lace gowns. All have the same political ideologies and puppet masters. All coincidence….
In April of 2014, the engagement announcement as well as pictures of Amal flaunting the almost $1 million “ethically mined diamond” hit the press. Great “humanitarians” they are, this would seem appropriate, but it was odd how much of a huge part the “ethically mined” angle of the ring took regarding the PR thereafter. There could be a reason for that. Clooney’s abuse of the term “humanitarian” continued in 2014 when Project Enough
released a report on war lordism and the mines of the Congo. The report indicated that due to the economic pressure of a provision of the US Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act, control over the mines had passed out of the hands of the warlords and local militias. This occurred via a provision that required any company using “conflict materials’ to register with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and publish their supply chain to shame them into using materials from which warlords and militias would not benefit thus loosening their control over the locals in the area. A theoretically noble request, this ‘humanitarian” cause, as with many of the others with which Clooney is affiliated, actually hurts the locals more than helps, while the rich get richer.
The villagers in the Congo call this provision “Obama’s Law” which set off a chain of events that has propelled millions of miners and their families deeper into poverty. As Congo began to comply with the law, its government starting shutting down the mining industry. Then, a process was launched to certify the country’s minerals as conflict-free. But the process unfolded extremely slowly, marred by a “lack of political will, corruption and bureaucratic and logistical delays”. That led foreign companies to avoid buying the minerals, which has driven down prices. Many miners are forced to find other ways to survive, including by joining armed groups. Meanwhile, the militias remain potent threats. ‘The intention of the law was good, but in practice, it was not well thought-out,’ said Eric Kajemba, director of the Observatory for Governance and Peace, a regional nonprofit group. ‘This is a country where the government is absent in many areas, plagued by years of war and bad governance, where the economic tissue has been destroyed. The American lawmakers didn’t appear to take this into consideration’.” Sounds an awful lot like Clooney’s involvement in the Sudan, both of which he attempted to address in an op-ed in June of that year, failing miserably when he pushed to “fair share” more taxpayer wealth to “Africa” via the UN when he stated the, “US government must give the Treasury Department the resources it needs to follow the money enabling mass atrocities and enforce sanctions against complicit actors” but later he admitted “Over the last decade, US taxpayers have contributed billions of dollars to Sudan for humanitarian Band-Aids and for peacekeepers in a land where there is no peace”. Billions? And nothing has changed there? So where did all that money go? And he wants more for the Sudan AND Congo? Why not use his money? Because the point is creating legislation to redistribute the world’s wealth from the 99% to the 1%, and, if that fails, forcing it, not anything remotely related to “human rights” or being “humanitarian”.
The initial intent of this Congo mining expedition involved creating legislation to undermine U.S. sovereignty by weakening the first amendment,. So far, it has not worked. On August 18, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reaffirmed that “both Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing Conflict Minerals Rule issued by the SEC violate the First Amendment to the extent that they require issuers to state on their website and to report to the SEC that their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free’.” The court gave two reasons for this decision:
“First, even assuming that the government’s interest in alleviating the humanitarian crisis in the DRC is sufficient under the AMIdecision, the effectiveness of the government’s chosen means to achieve that end is speculative and conjectural, falling far short of that required under the First Amendment to compel speech. No congressional hearings were held on the likely impact of Section 1502 prior to its passing, and post-enactment hearings offered mixed evidence of the Rule’s effectiveness. Second, for Zauderer to apply, the compelled disclosures must be of “purely factual and uncontroversial information” about the product or service being offered. The required disclosures failed this requirement.”
“Compel speech?” As we will see, the Clooneys claim to support “free” speech when, in reality, they support censored “controlled” speech. This is a very early indicator of their push to control speech via legislation on an international scale. Perhaps this is why by November, the greatest human rights attorney ever “figured out” that a 7 karat, $1 million ring might be a bit “too flashy” to wear at least in court, so she was requesting George get her a less ostentatious one. The supposed “ethically mined” portion of her diamond which was supposed to help with George’s “humanitarian” image had been struck down in court. Of course, she still heads out in $25K outfits and with the ring on as she is papped out with movie stars and not working, so maybe she missed the memo regarding the PR narrative shift?
It should also come as no surprise that Clooney’s interest in the Ukraine became public at this time for two reasons. First off, Amal supposedly represents former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. Secondly, guess who funds the Ukrainian protests? George Soros. He told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, “I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now”. These “events” involve the balkanization of the Ukraine, much like Libya and the Sudan. The information about George Soros’ involvement in Ukrainian politics was “openly voiced by Yulia Timoshenko in 2008. Timoshenko, then the country’s prime minister, said that she was attempting to minimize the effect of the global financial crisis by following George Soros’ advice.” George Soros is currently the one of top financial backers and overall supporter of the rebels in the Ukraine fighting against Putin for “democracy”…er…oil as “Ukraine has vast supplies of oil and natural gas. Energen, a natural gas utility, could be a prime
developer of Ukraine’s fossil fuel reserves. Soros owns nearly two million shares of that company.” In addition, Timoshenko has crony ties to the Clintons. Viktor Pinchuk, steel magnate, 54, ranked by Forbes Magazine among the richest men in the world.”teamed up with ( Yulia Tymoshenko), a protégée of the feared Dnipropetrovsk governor Pavlo Lazarenko. In the mid-1990s, Pinchuk and Tymoshenko founded Commonwealth, a firm that imported much-needed natural gas from the energy-rich Central Asian states to Ukraine. But the alliance was short-lived: Tymoshenko soon ditched Pinchuk and set up an energy trading firm of her own.” Later on, in 2004, she became prime minister to Viktor Yushcenko. As his fortune grew, Pinchuk bonded with the Clintons, by supporting the Clinton Global Initiative. In 2007, Pinchuk made his first donation to the CGI in the amount of $5 million dollars. Many more followed, thus giving him access to Washington.
In 2013, Maria Danilova of Tablet mag called Pinchuk a “bridge to the west”, so it should shock no one that in December of 2013 “Mr. Democracy” Clooney recorded a video message to protect his best interests claiming to support the Ukraine’s protestors, condemning violent crackdowns on protestors, as well as the ongoing detention of jailed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, client to his…whatever Amal was at the time. In March of 2014, just before the engagement announcement, George was seen wearing a T-shirt supporting her in January of 2014 during The Monuments Men press junket. In February of 2014, she was released
On a purely coincidental note, it might be worth noting that in December, as well, Dan Dubiecki and Lara Alameddine’s Allegiance Theater saw Hollywood heavyweight and longtime Clooney cohort Harvey Weinstein throw some work their way with “Veronica’s Room”. Coincidence, surely.
As the marriage set up got under way, the culmination of Clooney’s African “humanitarianism” as cover for his involvement in the globalist quest to redistribute wealth the way they see fit via the “green scheme” came on July 16, 2013. Nespresso and Techonserve launched a partnership to “improve the livelihoods of smaller coffee farmers while creating a more ‘sustainable’ source of supply for Nespresso”. Clooney has been a very well paid PR rep for Nespresso for a long time. Once the South Sudan split in 2011, Nespresso swooped in to claim the rich coffee bean resources there. Nespresso realized it had an “opportunity to stamp its name on an entirely new coffee origin. In doing so it is capitalizing on novelty, quality and the feel-good aspects of investing in a good cause that happens to be backed by an international celebrity.” Translation? They will exploit the resources to make lots of “green”. CEO Jean-Marc Duvoisin acknowledged, “”This is not a charitable exercise; this is business. It will depend upon farmers stepping up to the challenge and being part of a global economy, to continue delivering quality and consistent coffee.” How much will the farmers be paid? Not a mandated minimum wage as Clooney advocates in the United States, but a “living wage” which is, again, completely subjective language. How much is that especially compared to what Clooney and the CEOs will make? In 2013, he earned $40 million from his Nespresso deal. Surely he “fair shared” that with the farmers?
Also in 2013, the company convened its first “Sustainability Advisory Board, which will provide insight and recommendations to enhance Nespresso’s long-term sustainability strategy. The board is composed of experts and thought leaders in the area of sustainability, including TechnoServe President and CEO Bruce McNamer”…and George Clooney? Yes, he is on the board as a “thought leader”. The need for cynicism might not be so great if Clooney’s history of elitism and support of the 1% were not as great, that Clooney’s already been bought and paid for by Nespresso to the tune of $40 million as “ambassador”, the fact that a 20 year board member of Technoserve was George Soros’ brother Paul and that it is now known that the “pods” Clooney once championed over the “packets” back in 2006 cannot be recycled easily because they were made of both plastic and aluminium. The hypocrisy should surprise no one.
What we have here in a nutshell is cronyism from war profiteering—Clooney campaigned for South Sudan’s independence, then Nespresso, a primary financial backer of Clooney’s went in to lay claim to its resources as “sustainability” while using a Soros-backed initiative to promote it. Nevermind, this is the same Nespresso who paid the greatest humanitarian of all time handsomely to shill their coffee while their C.E.O. declared water was not a human right and continues to bottle water in drought stricken California. Clooney likes to boast that the money made from one of his contracts was used to fund his initial satellite project that just so happened to keep an eye on his coffee resources in South Sudan atrocities in Sudan to be able to call out those who profit from war. Anyone else see the irony in that statement? Yes… David Swanson from Global Research did: “Clooney’s new organization, “The Sentry,” is part of The Enough Project, which is part of the Center for American Progress, which is a leading backer of “humanitarian” wars, and various other wars for that matter — and which is funded by the world’s top war profiteer, Lockheed Martin, and by number-two Boeing, among other war profiteers.” Clooney supports the Soros funded “rebellions” in the Ukraine, Armenia, Libya, and the impending overthrow
of Assad. One might conclude that wars or “conflicts” that bring forth geopolitical events like the establishment of South Sudan as an independent region which will bring quite the financial windfall to Clooney and his cronies are okay since the “correct” people profit from them. In the meantime, not only has South Sudan fallen back into war, the real human rights atrocities are occurring unabated. Americans were attacked and raped by soldiers , and the UN and the U.S. embassy did nothing. Again, the Clooneys are only “humanitarians” when it is politically and financially expedient.
Chapter 11: The Year of the Wedding
In February of 2014, the entertainment media fawned all over the “smart and successful human rights attorney” and asked, “Has he met his match?” when Clooney took Amal to the White House, although she was not registered a guest, for a private screening of “The Monument’s Men”. Behind the scenes, as Obama gave members of the Muslim Brotherhood positions of power in the White House, the Clooney/Alamuddin partnership facilitated the Muslim invasion of the west. CAP published a follow-up to Fear, Inc. in that same month titled Fear, Inc. 2.0: The Islamophobia Network’s Efforts to Manufacture Hate in America, which contends that “American Muslims in the United States have been targeted, profiled, or seen as suspect because of their faith” by a malevolent, well-funded “Islamophobia Network” whose views are “not indicative of mainstream American views.” Notably, CAP has a high regard for such Islamist organizations as the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Council on American-Islamic Relations, which Fear, Inc. describes as a “civil rights group” but countries such as the United Arab Emirates now list as a terrorist organization. CAP elaborated:
“Islamophobia in the United States takes many shapes and forms. It takes the form of a general climate of fear and anger toward American Muslims, as seen in the ‘civilization jihad’ narrative, the religious right’s rhetoric, and the biased media coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing. It comes out in cynical political efforts to capitalize on this climate of fear, as seen in state-level anti-Sharia bills introduced across the country and in far-right politicians’ grandstanding. And perhaps most dangerously, it manifests itself in institutional policies that view American Muslims as a threat, as seen in the FBI training manuals that profile Islam as a religion of violence.”
See what is happening here? As our immigration laws are not enforced to allow for the “humanitarian” resettlement of “illegal” “refugees” and as “amnesty”, although ruled illegal by two federal judges, has been pushed by the administration as “humanitarian”, our border has eroded as attacks on our soil by radical Muslim extremists have increased. The same can be said throughout every country in Europe. While normal, rational thinking Americans and Europeans understand that not all Muslims are terrorists, it cannot be said that all these attacks were not done by radicalized Muslims. Irrelevant, though, as the globalists have jumped on these attacks to push that ALL Americans–well, gun owning and Christian Bible belt “clingers”—conservatives–are Islamophobic. See how that narrative crafting works? Clooney, the Obama administration, and pop culture will do its part to help, too. The evil “right” and/or “conservatives” in every country hate the rest of the world when in reality all they are attempting to do is what their elected leaders swore to do-protecting the innocent citizens of their sovereign nations from the evil that is being purposefully spread by UN operatives throughout the world for control. Hard to do when their leaders are a part of said UN operatives.
The coup for the Soros/Clooney merger occurred in September of 2014 when anti-Israeli, anti-west, defender of dictators and terrorists Amal Alamuddin/Alameddine became Clooney’s bride in a 3 day multi-million dollar public extravaganza that only members of the 1% could afford. Her Uncle Ziad, arms dealer to Libya, could not get released from jail in France to attend. Clooney had found (or been assigned) his Huma. With this marriage, Clooney brought Muslims and the use of Islamophobia as a weapon against Christian nations mainstream. Just look at some of those invited to celebrate. One was Walid Jumblatt , Progressive Socialist party leader and leader of the Druze
community in Lebanon of which the Alamuddins belong, who is no friend of the U.S. or Israel’s and uses his hate to push the west as “Islamophobic”. He says, “The U.S. always needs an enemy. It comes and goes. Today it is Islam. According to this plan or ideology of the born-again Christians who formed an alliance with Zionism (Israel), Islam is the monster”. Another one invited who made it was Machnouk. Think a Lebanese Al Gore. No background in science of any kind but he sure will impose rules and regulations under the guise of “green” something or other make “green” for his global elite friends and himself. Finally MP Marwan Hamade was invited, as well. Both Jumblatt and Hamade testified on behalf of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon’s (STL) Trial Chamber regarding the assassination of ex-Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. By the way… who is a lawyer for the STL? Amal Clooney.
Clooney’s political push of the platform for the global elites continued in 2014. Amal’s political leanings, however, were hushed. Her social media was deleted. Almost all references to her past before Clooney were wiped clean, as if she did not exist before 2013. There was a good reason for that. If the dots were connected and she, her family, and her friends were outed as an anti-west Muslim with radical views, if their politics in general were revealed, the media would have had a harder time convincing the masses to embrace her as the latest pop culture icon, and her assimilation into our mainstream would not have been as smooth. However, the pop culture skulls of mush were sold a bag of goods in the “greatest human rights attorney of all time” as some sort of “bastion of feminism” who landed the “ultimate bachelor” when in reality what we got was a Soros/UN plant into our pop culture with mediocre at best lawyering skills to soften the masses to radical Muslim extremism. While the masses are now distracted by her “feminism”, “humanitarianism” and “haute couture” fashion, really all she is doing is “assisting” on cases that benefit from her public forum to apply pressure to do the “right” thing by the globalists amid public outcries of support, not winning in a courtroom with facts and reason. She shows up for a few days, the world is told how expensive her outfits are while restating her ghost “human rights attorney” dossier, she spews a few “humanitarian” logical fallacy talking points, and then moves on to whomever is put before her next. In between, she calls the paps for diva walks, dines at elite restaurants, fixes up one of their mega mansions, and/or travels the world to exotic locations on private jets leaving behind an epic carbon footprint while living the “humanitarian” dream as she distracts the public as a “Muslim pop culture icon” as the Muslim invasion continues worldwide. Disagree with her false logic or call out his political beliefs and be hit with the latest microagression-Islamophobia. Amal Clooney and her family represent everything the west is not and everything the west wishes not to be, and they are using the Hollywood propaganda machine to do it masterfully. Goebbels would be proud.
Chapter 12: The Amal Experiment Fails
Did Amal expect to start suddenly winning cases with her new name immediately? All signs point to “yes”; however, it did not work out that way. She suffered several very public defeats as a result. Ibrahim Halawa, son of Hussein Halawa, the leading Muslim
Brotherhood cleric in Ireland, became caught up in the violent Egyptian military crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood in Aug 2013 after taking part in protests. He and his siblings were detained by the Egyptian military, and there were pleas in Ireland for their release. Amal now has her name attached to this case. The reasons why should be obvious. The press releases will read as a campaign for “human rights” and “free speech” but the pattern is established. She supports and defends terrorists and terrorist organizations, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood, and then uses her position in pop culture to use public pressure to shame others into accepting radical Islam as the “norm”. In September of 2015, however, the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee “voted not to invite lawyers for imprisoned Irish teenager Ibrahim Halawa to a public hearing. The surprise vote came after a report co-written by the law practice of Amal Clooney was
critical of the Government’s efforts to secure his release from custody in Egypt. The high profile human rights lawyer is the wife of Hollywood actor George Clooney. Her practice, Doughty Street Chambers, is one of three sets of lawyers representing the Dublin teen and had requested an audience in front of the committee.” Notice the term to describe her is not “winning” nor “accomplished” but “high profile”. Notice she was denied a “public hearing”. Since using the press to apply public pressure is her one and only job, not “winning” at least by legitimate legal means, this appeared a slap in the face to greatest human rights attorney ever born. If these public meetings cannot be procured, her role is nada. That could prove problematic to George, especially, who seems to have entered into this arrangement to be a part of some “Super UN Powercouple”. As a follow up, an August 7th report from Cairo claimed Egypt’s House rejected the Irish Parliament’s demand to release Halawa.
The hits kept coming. On December 9th 2015, reports surfaced that Greece decided not to pursue the return of the Parthenon Marbles. One of the first cases Amal took (and, yes, she can pick and choose which cases she takes) using her “high profile name” after the wedding involved “advising” Greece on the return of the so-called Elgin Marbles from Britain. This case, many believed, was expected to veer in her favor in order to legitimately establish her as an “accomplished” human rights attorney, thus providing precedent for her later cases. Instead, she showed up for staged photo ops with politicians and had the entertainment media swoon over her outfits. Eventually, she supposedly wrote up a 150 page report but was “dropped by the Greek government from their role in advising on the return of the so-called Elgin Marbles to Athens”. Regardless, her job was to bring the press, which she did, and therefore she was paid: “It should be noted that the total cost of the legal advice came to 200,000 English pounds, an amount that was paid by a Greek living in London who preferred to remain anonymous. The fact that Amal Clooney was part of the legal team that came to Athens, gave the issue great publicity and drew international sympathy for the Greek argument.” Publicity and international sympathy? Mission accomplished. “Human rights” is just a term used by her for political gain. However, the losses did not look good.
Amal lost another big case at this time, as well. On October 15th, 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) gave its verdict on a man who denied the Armenian Genocide occurred, a case which Miss “Je Suis Charlie” took on to violate the free speech of this man as some form of “human right”. Keep in mind that the Clooneys care NADA about “human rights”, “free speech”…any of the “good” humanitarian issues they claim to support. They care about how they benefit from it. The outcome of this case would have a huge impact on their “100 Lives” initiative, a supposed platform to commemorate the 100 year anniversary of this atrocity, even though neither one of them showed up in Armenia for the celebrations this past April. However, the Kardashians did, which we will later see. It also explains the globalists behind this initiative and what they hope to get out of it. In any event, the greatest human rights attorney to ever walk the planet was DENIED: “By this verdict it upheld a judgment of the Second Section of the ECtHR on the Perinçek v. Switzerland case. The Second Section decided that the Swiss government violated Perinçek’s right of expression when it punished him on the grounds that he had violated the Swiss Penal Code by denying the Armenian genocide….In this verdict, the Grand Chamber pointed out that ‘unlike the international criminal courts, it
had no competence to make legally binding pronouncements on whether the massacres and mass deportations suffered by the Armenian people could be characterized as genocide.” See…“free speech” is not “speech with which a group of people agree”. That, however, is how the Clooneys are working to help define it. If she truly wanted to support “free speech” for all, she and her husband should have used this platform to stand for his right to say such words and then correct him accordingly. They would never as it is never about “human rights” with them. It is always about how much they make financially and politically from every cause/case they take up. This loss was a blow to Amal as the unfavorable outcome would have a huge impact on their “100 Lives” initiative, a supposed platform to commemorate the 100 year anniversary of this atrocity. Oh, she and her boss Geoffrey Robertson tried to spin it. However, it proves to be a thorn in her side later.Oh, she and her boss Geoffrey Robertson tried to spin it. However, it is and will prove to be a thorn in her side later.
These were three huge cases for “Mrs. Clooney’s” career. Two were flat out losses, one where she argued AGAINST free speech. All three denied her the opportunity to gloat publicly on the international stage in hopes of swaying the rules of law in sovereign nations as well as the court of public opinion in the future in favor of an international system of government. By the end of 2015, media outlets began asking about her “accomplished” attorney title: <translated> “The professionalism of the lawyer has been discussed these days for its withdrawal in the case of the Athenian Acropolis. The British of Lebanese origin has left the case, but not of its own accord if the Greek government has preferred to follow the negotiations through diplomatic channels banishing (final) criminal proceedings. The firm for which he works Amal Clooney has received 250,000 euros for taking care of it.” She has proven herself a horrible lawyer whose “high public profile” allows her to choose the cases to which she attaches her name. Somehow among all of these losses, Amal got a RAISE. When a person with no moral compass is on the globalist payroll pushing its agenda on a global scale, a pay raise is in order, it seems. What is really appalling is that it is admittedly all because of her name. Starpulse reports, “Ever since Amal, 37, emerged as the silver fox’s steady romance, her rates have risen. Today, if you want to chat with Mrs. Clooney about a legal matter at Doughty Street Chambers in London, it will set you back £500 an hour or $742.00 an hour.” This woman is touted as a modern day feminist? See, girls? Want a raise regardless of any actual professional skills? Marry a rich guy and then strut around in haute couture. Amal Clooney. Setting women back decades.
The pattern has emerged that as “real life” proves her a fraud, Hollywood steps in to help rebrand her fictional profile. Within days, the entertainment media tried to spin these losses as something positive, too, and then quickly shifted to portraying her as a “fashion icon”, a role she so desperately wants. Alas, Jackie-O, Princess Di, and even Carolyn Bessette she is not, nor will she ever be for a variety of reasons, mostly her politics, although the repeated flashing of her undergarments helps not, either. The ideologies she practices and the politics she pushes are the antithesis of everything for which those three women stood, and it comes forth in the way she carries herself. Princess Di and Jackie wore designer gowns and had lavish homes; however, Diana hugged AIDS patients and visited the sick and poor in African nations. Jackie-O worked a lifetime actively supporting children and the poor. Smug, arrogant, and condescending, Amal
Clooney sends out PR statements about her “human rights humanitarianism” while desperately trying to fit into the world of the fashion elite with her expensive haute couture. On December 16th, the “100 Lives” initiative which, remember, is supposed to deal with the Armenian genocide and their descendants, announced the “Amal Clooney Scholarship”. A woman with no professional accomplishments to her name except losses who is known only for her marriage names a scholarship after herself for some positive PR. The “accomplished international human rights lawyer” partnered up with 100 LIVES to “offer one young woman each year the chance to enroll in a two-year international baccalaureate programme”. Two years? Why not four? This is a Vartan Gregorian, co-founder of “100 Lives”, funded initiative. These are extremely wealthy people who could have deep pockets. Then there is the way in which the winner, Pamela Tebchrany, 16, from Dhour Choueir, northeast of Beirut, found out. She received the news while at school in Armenia. “A friend sent me an article Vogue in which I mentioned. That’s how I heard the news!”, said the girl to L’Orient-Le Jour. It was more important that Vogue knew about it before the girl who actually won the scholarship? Okay. This scholarship is so important , and Amal cares so much for women and “the children” that Amal did not even show up to present it.
Haute couture, pap walks, internationally infamous, no wins or leads as a supposed “accomplished” human rights attorney…perhaps that is why on December 13the she was portrayed as the “dressing up doll” in a Telegraph’s pantomime of The Nutcracker. With lines such as, “Don’t worry, I’m a grown up, globe-trotting, sophisticated doll. I do good while dressed in haute couture and I’m here to defend your human right to wear Givenchy” and “(twirling happily) I am going to do good in this place, fight for justice, defend the oppressed, right all wrongs. I’m also going to perform a stylish fouetté. But first I must get a new, warmer outfit”, the proverbial shoe seem to fit.” The world sees her for what she is, but when anyone tries to mention it, the “anti-women” rhetoric heats up. As “Amal Clooney: Wife From Hell Embarrasses George With ‘Celebrity’ Diss” :
“The lawyer in the $3,400 suits doesn’t want you confusing her with mere actresses! ‘I don’t really see myself in the same way because I’m still doing the same job that I used to do before,’ said Amal, whose wardrobe includes $2,000 outfits by designer Stella McCartney, and a $3,440 Chanel suit. Human-rights attorney Amal also shamed George by sporting expensive gowns designed by Hitler-loving designer John Galliano! ‘You know, I think there is a certain responsibility that comes with that. I think I’m exercising it in an appropriate manner by continuing to do this kind of work.’ If so, someone might have told her not to wear a bunch of new stuff from Dolce and Gabbana, including a hideous mumsy-style custom made jacket and a blinding green mini dress that goes for just $1595 at Saks.”
She brings it on herself. One can head to Amal Clooney Style, which is supposedly run by her people, to see how the great “humanitarian” ventures to work in thousands of dollars of haute couture, $800 heels, and diamonds for her pap walks which she never wears twice. There is also a separate list of Mrs. Clooney’s $25,000 Dreamcoats. But the Clooneys are for the “little guy” and rail against the “1%”.
When Amal is out, always dressed to the nines in the most expensive designer wear George’s money can buy, we never see this woman with friends of her own. Ever. They are either co-workers, her family, or friends of George’s. When she is out with any of these people, her photos are taken from the right side of her face or head-on only, she is to be the center of attention, and never, under ANY circumstance, is she to be photographed directly next to Cindy Crawford. Take, for instance, the Casagmigos launch party in Ibiza:
Then the sophisticated flash in Notting Hill with the Damons & Gerbers. Alas no pictures of her next to Lucy or Cindy.
In early December, Amal was out not with her famous hubby but her mommy when she attended Charlotte Tilbury’s holiday party in London wrapped in tin foil and real fur:
By the end of 2015, the Clooneys had been exposed. They are not humanitarians, and they do not strive to protect the human rights of the downtrodden. They strive to enable the 1% while making themselves rich, the anti-thesis of everything George claimed not to be most of his professional life. As such, their careers and reputations are in the toilet. We have already discussed Amal’s losses in the fall of 2015. These must have proven a blow to George as the expectation might have existed for her publicly manipulated hopeful victories to act as coattails on which he could ride for his two movies scheduled for release in the spring. The Monuments Men was a big disappointment, as evidenced in George’s emails to Sony’s Amy Pascal in the Sony email hack, Tomorrowland was one of the biggest bombs of all time, and Our Brand is Crisis was one of Clooney’s biggest personal flops. He needed a hit with either Hail, Caesar (which he did not get) or with the upcoming Money Monster almost as much as Amal needed a win. Her losses leading up to the holiday season were big and very public.
As such, the Clooneys disappeared for the holidays. The last time they were seen together in 2015 was on November 8th. As rumors of marriage woes and Amal’s diva-like antics swirled, it became apparent that a PR rebrand for Clooney was needed for 2016. The
“humanitarian” and “pro-democracy” angles seemed to be the platforms chosen as he more than likely was to be used as a pop culture face for Hillary’s push towards the White House. . Not only do we now know that George is not either one of those, but Amal blew any chance for him to try to redeem himself with professional maneuvering that saw her pervert justice, mock democracy, and undermine the laws of sovereign nations in order to get criminals out of prison in an attempt to secure that elusive “victory”. Seems to run in direct opposition to what George wants to accomplish at least publicly.
Chapter 13: Mohammed Fahmy
When the newfound media exposure and pop culture status that her three day wedding circus brought did not amount to immediate “victories” on the cases on which she began to “assist” after her “marriage” because the facts of these cases combined with her poor lawyering skills did not merit it, the shift veered to other ways to “win”. Keep in mind that most of these cases also keep with the points for regime change for the globalists’ benefit via any of the three platforms discussed. One regime change touched on was in Egypt which came on the heels of Obama’s great “Arab Spring” decree. As noted, this change facilitated the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the people of Egypt eventually overthrew because they are a terrorist organization with ties to Hamas, confirmed by Article 2 of the Charter of Hamas, which reads:
“The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of the Muslim Brothers in Palestine. The Muslim Brotherhood Movement is a world organization, the largest Islamic Movement in the modern era. It is characterized by a profound understanding, by precise notions and by a complete comprehensiveness of all concepts of Islam in all domains of life: views and beliefs, politics and economics, education and society, jurisprudence and rule, indoctrination and teaching, the arts and publications, the hidden and the evident, and all the other domains of life.”
This is important as we analyze the cases Amal takes on supporting terrorists after her marriage as the Brotherhood and Egypt play an important role in many of them.
Al Jazeera journalist Mohammed Fahmy was arrested on December 29, 2013 for conspiring against the Egyptian government with the Muslim Brotherhood. On June 23, 2014 Fahmy was sentenced to jail for 7 years for conspiracy of working with terrorist groups, among them the Muslim Brotherhood. Again, Amal’s chambers had the case but her name was not attached to it because she was not yet married. She was still establishing her “brand”. On November 24, 2014-two months after the wedding-Amal began “assisting” on the case. On Jan 1, 2015 he was granted new case, and on February 2, Fahmy gave up his Egyptian citizenship paving the way to return to Canada, where he held dual citizenship in hopes of “in hopes of benefiting from the same decree through which Greste was released”. On a side note, someone else who holds dual citizenship with Canada? Lara Alameddine.
During a seeming lull in his case, it is important to note that in May of 2015, “The Iranian media was among the first to get the message when it said that the Gulf countries’ arms deals with France [think possibly Uncle Ziad] were meant to reward Paris for its role in the nuclear talks with [ “death to America” “death to Israel”] Iran and mark a new chapter in the relations between France and the GCC….Writing for the London-based newspaper Al Hayat [of which Amal’s mother Baria is the foreign editor], Mohammad Barhouma said that president Hollande’s attendance at the Riyadh summit was a meaningful move and can be seen as a prelude to the GCC leaders’ meeting with President Obama later this month in Camp David…Writing for Al Hayat, Randa Takieddine [related to Amal] said that Mr Hollande’s presence in Riyadh and the French arms deal with Qatar must not be regarded as a challenge to or rivalry with the US…France has a special importance to Gulf countries because its policy has usually been congruent with their interests in the region. President Hollande’s stance on Iran and Syria has brought him closer to the Gulf, as he has been openly critical of Iran’s role in Syria, Yemen and Lebanon, and taken a hard line in the nuclear talks.” Here it seems someone with the same ties in the same line of work as Amal’s uncle was able to secure Iranian arms deals with France in return for their “support”. More arms dealing as such where Egypt is concerned follows.
Going forward, to August 29, 2015, Fahmy was sentenced to three years in prison for spreading false news; Amal then brought the international press to shame Egypt into pardoning him. George took it to the Toronto Film Festival where he was promoting the box office bomb “Our Brand is Crisis”. It worked. Fahmy was “pardoned” on September 23 because, as President El Sisi revealed, “the heavy sentences had a ‘very negative’ impact on Egypt’s reputation and that he wished they had never been put on trial.” Clooney paparazzi clown shows will do that. However, there has been no such media fanfare as one might expect. Could the reasoning involve that on the EXACT SAME DAY the Egyptian journalist for which Amal prostituted her academic credentials to introduce the pop culture world to her brand of “human rights” was released, September 23, “Two French warships originally built for Russia, but not delivered because of the crisis
in Ukraine, will be sold to Egypt instead, the French government announced Wednesday…. A spokesman for the French government, Stéphane Le Foll, refused to elaborate on the price Egypt had agreed to pay. Mr. Hollande said only that France would “ensure the delivery of these ships without losing anything, while helping protect Egypt.” According to the short announcement, Holland “met with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi Wednesday and negotiated the ‘principle and terms of the purchase…. The two ships had originally been built for the Russian navy, but their sale was canceled in September 2014 because of Russia’s involvement in the war in Ukraine and mounting pressure from NATO for France to call off the sale’. ” Based on the information we know about their positions as puppets for Ukraine financier Soros and about Amal’s uncle as an arms dealer to the Middle East through France combined with albeit circumstantial evidence to support the assertion that that Amal has used his connections to get her on cases that are economically viable to her family, it bears noting that September of 2014 was the wedding. Amal was put on the case in November. Egypt was then awarded the contracts the day they handed Amal her first public victory. It is not rocket science. Two billion dollars is a big quid pro quo payoff.
Sticking with the “Islamophobia” script, two days after the pardon, the cries started: “the Canadian government had little to do with Fahmy’s release. Although ‘sheepish whimpers’—as lawyer Amal Clooney characterized the government’s response—were made to secure his freedom, the government’s lack of action was evident from the start showcasing the flawed precedence of ideology over humanity. The suggestion is simple: citizenship by itself does not guarantee equal treatment and is instead judged on a hierarchy that naturally favors descendants of white Europeans who settled in Canada before multiculturalism took root. It is a dangerous precedent that justifies discrimination with the backing of government legislation. Whether the government would have been more vocal if the victim in question was an ‘old stock Canadian’ who worked for a
conservative media outlet rather than a Mohamed Fahmy who headed the Egyptian Al Jazeera bureau is a question that unfortunately merits honest analysis.” See? If he would have been a conservative, white, old, man, the government would have rushed to help him, it seems. Forget whether he was guilty or not. “Pardoned” does not absolve guilt. Forget his possible ties to the Muslim Brotherhood which he seems to confirm at least his support for them on his Twitter account. Nope. Islamophobia. Oh…and the Egyptian citizenship he revoked to help further his release? On December 30th, 2015, Fahmy “sent an official request to Egypt’s foreign ministry asking that his Egyptian nationality be restored”. Fahmy renounced his Egyptian citizenship in February of 2015 but kept his Canadian citizenship in hopes of “benefitting from the same decree through which Greste was released”. Amal lobbied for Egypt to deport Fahmy to Canada which, under new laws set in place from President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, “allows for foreign convicts or suspects to be transferred to their country to serve their sentence or to be tried there.” He wanted to be a Canadian only to help clear his name. She asked to meet with Canadian foreign minister John Baird to move the process along. Remember her job is to bring public pressure, so he said no. No Clooney clownshow for Canada. Eventually he was “pardoned “ by Egypt via the public pressure brought by the Amal Clooney clownshow, as formerly admitted by the Egyptian government, as his citizenship reinstated in June of 2016.
The underlying cause for concern in this case, as if those reasons were not enough, shows us the first time we see in action the deplorable actions of a desperate lawyer in need of victory. Amal claimed that Egypt threatened to arrest her. She told The Guardian, “When I went to launch the report, first of all they stopped us from doing it in Cairo. They said: ‘Does the report criticize the army, the judiciary, or the government?’ We said: ‘Well, yes.’ They said: ‘Well then, you’re risking arrest.’” However, Egypt denied this happened and demanded proof from Clooney the government issued that warning. “She should say exactly who said that,” said Interior Ministry Spokesman Abdel Latif. “Why not specify from the start who told her that? We have nothing against her”. Police General Hany Abdelatif told The Guardian that Egypt never listed her for arrest. Eventually she retracted her statement. Amal Clooney lied to the international press about a phony threat of arrest by a national government to garner public sympathy for her cause. She has turned into a security risk. But, hey, it got Fahmy a book deal and in it he will get to trash the west via the spin: Louise Dennys, executive publisher at Penguin Random House Canada, who acquired world rights to the book, said, “Combined with his authoritative understanding of the region and worldwide consequences of the increasing violence, it provides a rare window onto the players and their personal and global ambitions, Western governments included,” she added. It would surprise who, exactly, if George optioned it for a movie and gave it “creative license”?
Chapter 14: Nasheed and the Maldives
Perhaps no other case symbolizes the marriage between the elites, the Clooneys, and their quest for control regardless of the facts then that of Mohamed Nasheed and the Maldives. It covers regime change, “climate” and involves the Muslim Brotherhood. Yes, Nasheed is Brotherhood backed. He was “the 2008 presidential candidate of the Maldivian Democratic Party and as such sought and received the endorsement of four other opposition parties, including the Saudi- and United Arab Emirates-financed Salafist Adhaalath (Justice) Party. Adhaalath is an ideological partner of the Muslim Brotherhoods of Egypt and Syria.” The rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the new Maldivian government parallels what occurred in Egypt, where Obama and Hillary had put the Muslim Brotherhood in power with billions of US taxpayer dollars after the vaulted Arab Spring. The same Muslim Brotherhood with whom the Egyptian journalist Amal supposedly represented were supposedly affiliated. The same Muslim Brotherhood with whom “close friend of Affleck” Huma Weiner, Hillary’s close aide, is affiliated, whose mother is a leader of the Muslim Sisterhood counterpart. The same Muslim Brotherhood which is rising in our own country, infiltrating our government at almost every level. The same Muslim Brotherhood whose Sharia, which runs in direct opposition to the U.S. Constitution, is now the basis for law in Dearborn, Michigan but was thrown out in Garland, TX, and has had preemptive measures passed against it in many other cities as the cries of “Islamophobia” follow. This is, again, with whom the Clooneys have aligned themselves for personal gain—radical Muslim extremists who intend to invade not assimilate.
In preparation for the first direct presidential election for the Maldives president in 2008, outside “’democracy manipulators’” descended on the Maldives, a country that had become popular with the globalists because of its geographical location for use in the “climate change” scheme as the Maldives is supposedly threatened by rising sea levels. Nasheed was immediately embraced by the world’s glitterati community of NGOs and celebrities, including carbon tax-and-trade advocates and the crowd who gathered at the Sundance Film Festival to view a sycophantic film about Nasheed called The Island President. Keep in mind that Sundance is owned by Soros via the Soros Documentary Fund which, in 2002, “was fully integrated into the Sundance Institute with a $4.6 million grant from the Open Society Foundations and renamed The Sundance Documentary Film Program… In 2009, the Open Society awarded Sundance with an additional $5 million grant to continue its documentary filmmaking efforts, singing its praises as it “raised awareness” for the “climate change” agenda. Nasheed promoted this “global warming” documentary entitled The Island President at the 2011 Toronto Film Festival where it won Best Documentary and, coincidentally, George Clooney was at the same time promoting The Ides of March.
Nasheed also pushed the correct “climate denier” talking points to brainwash the masses into thinking that only those horrible conservatives can read and understand science. Anyone not on board or involved with the wealth redistribution scheme known as “climate change” is a ‘conservative climate denier” just as anyone who promotes citizens over illegals and sovereignty over UN rule is a “right wing extreme Islamophobe”. Last year Nasheed said, “There is nothing Conservative about advocating for the destruction of the climate, and thus all we hold dear. This is not a credible Conservative standpoint: it is reckless and extreme…. A denialist, Conservative movement has no solutions to offer these countries and therefore risks irrelevancy.” Advocating for the destruction of the climate? Who does that? No one. We all have to live here. “Denialist?” No one denies the climate changes. It has been changing for literally billions of years. It never stops changing. It is the “use the climate change agenda to destroy capitalism while forcefully redistributing global ‘wealth’ to the elites” mantra with which to take issue. The whole point of the “climate change” scam is to establish a new form of global economics that eliminates free market capitalism admitted by Christiana Figueres who heads up theU.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. She said, “This is probably the
most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history. This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for the, at least, 150 years, since the industrial revolution”. The “green “ in “climate change” has always been about the cash not the environment. It is why we must be guilted into accepting it. John Kerry admitted that a few days ago when he said, “Public Shaming is ‘Most Powerful Weapon in Many Ways’ to Enforce World Climate Agreement”. The Clooneys have mastered the art of public shaming to get what they want since their
arguments are usually never valid. See Amal’s actual professional dossier or the DNC leaks which support the “climate change” scheme as they show George Soros paid Al Gore $30 million dollars to promote “global warming”. See prior mentions of the Soros aligned Participant Media which produced Gore’s factually incorrect “An Inconvenient Truth” as well as Clooney’s “masterpieces”. CONTROL. THE. NARRATIVE.
With that kind of money to go around, George Clooney long ago jumped on this bandwagon. After the Haiti earthquake of 2013, he came out in true ad hominem attack mode with this gem: “Well it’s just a stupid argument,” Clooney told reporters. “If you have 99 percent of doctors who tell you ‘you are sick’ and 1 percent that says ‘you’re fine, you probably want to hang out with, check it up with the 99. You know what I mean? The idea that we ignore that we are in some way involved in climate change is ridiculous. What’s the worst thing that happens? We clean up the earth a little bit?” The Academy Award winner added that while there is no way to know if global warming was responsible for the typhoon, denying the existence of climate change is “ridiculous.” Good puppet using the public shaming technique when facts cannot be argued to influence policy and outcomes. Good puppet using the public shaming technique when facts cannot be argued to influence policy and outcomes. Amal uses this method of operation to get Nasheed released, mocking democracy, the rules of law of a sovereign nation, and the press along the way.
On April 7th 2015, it was announced that Amal would be part of Nasheed’s legal team in his “ongoing arbitrary detention” or the public shaming for his release because the facts of the case prove that he has no case. First, Amal Clooney’s claim that Nasheed was unlawfully imprisoned is a lie. The supposedly “lover of democracy” basically arrested a chief judge after he passed a ruling Nasheed did not like. According to “A Wrong Kind of Green”, “Just as other Soros / NED-installed regimes began to violate the constitutions of their respective nations, including Georgia and Ukraine, Nasheed was no different. On December 10, 2010, the Maldivian Supreme Court ruled that Nasheed’s cabinet ministers could not serve without the approval of parliament. Nasheed responded by declaring the Maldivian courts were controlled by supporters of ex-president Gayoom and on January 16, 2012, Nasheed ordered the military to arrest Abdulla Mohammed, the Chief Justice of the Criminal Court.” The Soros/NED global glitterati, including the Soros-funded “Democracy Now” program hosted by Amy Goodman and partly-funded by Soros, featured Nasheed close adviser and communications assistant British national Paul Roberts on an interview, in which Nasheed’s successor was described as a thug and who was trying to re-assume power. Of course, the Soros propaganda program made no mention of Nasheed’s repeated violations of the Maldivian constitution. Neither would his eventual “lawyer”.
According to Hassan Saeed, who served as a special adviser under both (Nasheed) and President Mohammed Waheed:
“7 February 2012, confronted with serious unrest over his illegal arrest of the chief judge, Nasheed resigned on his own volition and then, belatedly realizing what he had done, tried to claim it was a coup in order to court international sympathy and media coverage….An exhaustive report by the Commonwealth last month found there was no coup, and that in fact Nasheed resigned voluntarily. The inquiry took six months to compile and interviewed nearly 300 witnesses who gave more than 200 hours of statements. Nasheed’s accusation of a coup was reported around the world, but when the evidence didn’t stack up, large sections of the media chose to ignore an inconvenient truth. Crucially, at the time the report was published, its conclusions were also accepted by Nasheed. In a recent speech to the Royal Commonwealth Society he claims that there was a “cover-up”. If so, the cover-up includes a professor of constitutional law from Canada, a senior judge with 25 years of experience from New Zealand, and a retired Supreme Court judge from Singapore, all of whom were on the inquiry panel…. The facts are that on 7 February 2012, confronted with serious unrest over his illegal arrest of the chief judge, Nasheed resigned on his own volition and then, belatedly realizing what he had done, tried to claim it was a coup in order to court international sympathy and media coverage.”
Later, Nasheed could not believe the trouncing his political party, the Maldavian Democratic Party (MDP) took in the Parliamentary polls the following election cycle in March of 2014. He blamed low voter turnout. Then in the fall, during the presidential elections, “The first round (of voting) saw Nasheed drub his opponents but left him short of an outright majority, which meant a run-off was necessary…A new first round produced a similar result, but Nasheed finally lost in the run-off to Abdullah Yameen, a half-brother of former dictator Gayoom. Nasheed surprised many by accepting defeat.” Again he was dismayed that the international community did not support him not only during the coup but during the presidential loss. He was then said to be “biding his time”. For what one could only guess…unless they followed the politics and story of George and Amal Clooney and their ties to the Island President. The fall of 2014 not only saw Nasheed lose this election, it also saw the “world’s most famous bachelor” get married to the “greatest human rights attorney of all time” in a three day extravaganza which was used to solidify her carefully PR crafted non-existent resume and embellished biography. Perhaps he was ‘biding his time’ to make himself the international superstar he always dreamed on the heels of the Clooney name. All signs point to yes. Why? JMP Verdant Communications.
JMP Communications is a public relations firm that “works with individuals and governments to enhance and protect their international reputations through effective and strategic engagement with the media.” One of their top clients for many years is Mohamed Nasheed. Founder Julia Pacetti, CEO and President, is “an expert media strategist, specializing in maximizing impact for current affairs and entertainment campaigns. She has deep expertise in executing media and public affairs strategies for projects that lie at the intersection of politics and entertainment…..Julia is the international media advisor to former President Mohamed Nasheed.” She was also the person who ferried Nasheed’s wife Laila when she visited Washington DC in April of 2015. Before founding JMP Verdant, Julia worked in publicity for Miramax Films/Harvey Weinstein, the guy who was executive producer of Confessions of a Dangerous Mind and has given Lara Alameddine, Amal’s cousin, her first big budget director title with Money Maker starring, yes, George Clooney, for release later this year.
The other member of JMP Verdant is Paul Roberts, Chief Political and Communication Strategist. He is listed as “a communications expert, specializing in strategy, framing and messaging. He has a particular interest in energy, environment and foreign policy issues, and extensive experience working in Asia-Pacific. He has provided advice to, and executed communications campaigns for, a range of prominent individuals and organizations, from Heads of Government to film stars; NGOs to multilateral organizations. As a reward for the role he played in bringing Nasheed to power as founder and managing editor of Minivan News from 2004-2008, Paul was chief communications advisor to Maldives President
Mohamed Nasheed for over three years (2008-2012), responsible for strategic communications and international media relations. He is the gentleman listed earlier as the one who referred to Nasheed’s successor as a thug in an interview with George Soros’s “Democracy Now”. Paul helped create an exceptional international public profile for President Nasheed, and helped the President to win numerous international awards and recognition, such as: the UN’s “Champions of Earth”, Time’s “Hero of Environment”, Newsweek’s “World’s Top 10 Leaders” and Foreign Policy’s “100 Thinkers of 2010”. Paul also orchestrated world-famous media events, including the Maldives underwater cabinet meeting, and spearheaded the country’s prominent international climate change advocacy. Paul acted as President Nasheed’s international spokesperson during and after the February 7, 2012 coup d”etat, alerting the international community to the true nature of the transfer of power. Paul remains President Nasheed’s Communications Advisor.”
Then there is Jared Genser, one of Amal’s closest co-workers. His work ethic portrays him as almost the male equivalent of her. According to Hussain Faisal, author of “Questioning the Legitimacy of ‘Genser Justice’”, “He is in fact more of an activist and a lobbyist with a Harvard law degree than he is a legitimate lawyer. The methods employed by his own private brand of justice do not involve any courts. He has transformed the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary detention into an instrument of his success. He uses their verdict as a tool to put political pressure on the countries. In the case of the Maldives، he has called for economic sanctions، which would affect every house hold in the country. In effect، he is using friends in high places to wage economic warfare on the country”.
Replace “Harvard” with “Columbia”, keep in mind Amal’s albeit short history of “political pressure” to get her desired outcomes, and yes, they seem destined for each other. Faisal goes on to say, “It is clear that People like Jared Genser، Amal Clooney، and Paul Roberts do not care what they do to free their client…. it stands to reason that their client is not innocent as they proclaim. He might not be the definition of a terrorist، subjective at best، under international law. However، he did violate the individual rights of a person. If Nasheed is let out of prison and pardoned، it would mean that he was innocent all along. It would also set a precedent whereby a sitting president can take the law into his own hands and use the military to detain anyone that irks him. This would also mean that extra judicial، arbitrary detention is a legitimate political tool”. Unfortunately we have seen this judicial activism not only via “international law” but recently in the U.S. regarding a variety of topics the past few years. “Democracy” is dying if it is not already dead. The Clooneys and their ilk have killed it. We are now ruled by a judicial activism based on the desires of the 1% who run their show.
Speaking of public relations, remember Amal’s mother, Baria Alamuddin, with Alison Bell runs Globell Communications. According to their website, “Globell Communications has been leading the international communications training market for over 15 years and has collaborated with a number of the world’s leading PR Companies and their clients….Globell Communications’ desire is to improve international communications and
ensure all communication is effective in today’s fast-paced global environment.” Take the former international media adviser to Nasheed + the chief communications advisor to Nasheed and add in an “internationally renowned human rights lawyer” who received the Jack J. Katz Memorial Award for excellence in entertainment law while at New York University School of Law and whose mother co-owns a PR firm that specialized in “ensur(ing) all communication is effective in today’s fast-paced global environment” and voila! Is it too far-fetched to think that this was her goal all along? Did she plan to become the kind of “human rights” lawyer who picks clients according to their potential to be publicly exploited? Not really. “Feminist” Amal could not change her last name to Clooney fast enough so she could start.
Immediately after the wedding, Amal started attaching her married name or getting her married name attached to cases her firm had long before she was Mrs. Clooney that could benefit from international shaming via the press. First up? The Elgin Marbles. Then the Armenian Genocide “free speech” case, the eventual outcomes of which have both been discussed. She lost both very publicly which exposed not only her laughable lawyer skills but her inability to press shame a victory for the globalists. Nasheed, who attended the Toronto Film Festival in 2011 with George Clooney and was financially backed by some of the same people the Clooneys are, did not seem to care about her inability to lawyer as for him, like Amal, it is all about the public stage, not the actual law. Nasheed let the February 22nd appeals deadline for his arrest pass simply because “he refused to enter the courtroom for the first hearing of his appeal case in protest because the hearing was not open to the public…Nasheed’s legal team had requested that the court hold an open and public hearing. However, only members of Nasheed’s legal team and family were allowed inside the courtroom, said Maldivian broadcasting company news. The news site, quoting sources, said Nasheed refused to enter the courtroom after the court turned down his request for an open hearing.” What is the point of filing an appeal if there is no public stage on which to call attention to oneself? He was going to take care of that.
While in Egypt shilling for “freedom of the press” with Mohammed Fahmy, Amal announced on international television that she would be in the Maldives to make sure all of the available media went, too. As Amal continued her “human rights” quest for the Maldives President, even though the deadline for his chance to appeal had passed, it came to light that not only was she not involved in any of the legal process with this case as she had no jurisdiction over it, but she sat with the “common folk” in the courtroom, not with the “real” lawyers, further confirming her role as a glorified PR rep. One aspect of “democracy” the DNC leaks helped prove no longer exists is that of an impartial media. Press talking points from May 5th state Hillary is their candidate. CNN is, indeed, the “Clinton News Network as the DNC fed CNN the questions they wanted to be asked in interviews. POLITICO’s Ken Vogel emailed his stories to the DNC before publishing them. The DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories and discussing their relationship with NBC, MSNBC, CNN & how to get better treatment. In fact, Chuck Todd is
mentioned by name in a few of the emails. It is no surprise, then, that when Amal had this false narrative to push, she did it with Todd on “Meet the Press”. He asked her whether she represented Mr. Nasheed in court to which she replied that she visited him in jail and “attended” a hearing for his alleged appeal to extend his appeal, which was denied, but stopped short of confirming his in-court representation. The whole event became another “Clooney clownshow”. She did show up in outfits that cost more than most families on the island make in a year as it was clear their teams had predetermined to take the high profile media blitz route for maximum exposure to apply public pressure for his release while lending an international platform for his “cause”. At least that was the consensus
of Ahmed Adheeb, the Vice President of the Maldives, who offered, “In the spirit of this approach of pressuring the government and courts through the media, he has chosen not to formerly appeal his conviction, even when he had the opportunity to do so. Indeed, his legal team led by Mrs. Clooney left the Maldives the day before the High Court announced the time for appeal had run its course, leaving in no doubt that their visit was purely for the purposes of publicity.” And possibly to have publicly shamed the tiny island nation into releasing him for the Paris Climate talks. If that was the case, it proved another epic Amal professional fail as the request for an extension was denied. Indeed, the headlines lamented, “The Paris Summit is Missing One of the Great World Leaders on Climate” . This article stated, “Amnesty International and the great human rights lawyer Amal Clooney are doing their best – but they’re up against thugs, pure and simple.” Great human rights lawyer. Paul Roberts. Thugs. The talking point struggle is real.
Since Nasheed’s appeal deadline came and went, on what grounds did Amal think she would be able to secure her first “human rights” victory before the rebranding of husband as a “humanitarian” and “movie star” was to start in late January? Illness. This, it seems, is Amal’s method of operation since she cannot win based on facts and/or her lawyering skills. Yulio Tymoshenko, Ukraine’s former prime minister, began treatment in Berlin’s Charite hospital for three slipped discs in March of 2014, just before the engagement announcement but after George was seen wearing a T-shirt supporting her in January of 2014 during The Monuments Men press junket. Fahmy tried getting out with a hepatitis C diagnosis as well as treatment for a supposedly badly injured shoulder. Again, this was in March of 2014. Senussi supposedly had liver issues. Assange? He has been trying this “get out of jail due to illness” mantra for a while. First it was his heart and lungs in August of 2014 just before the wedding. Then it was his shoulder in 2015 as Amal was wrapping up her PR junket in the Maldives but before all her losing streak. Poor Julian. Gloria Arroyo claimed to have a bone mineral disorder which required treatment abroad. The hospital arrest under which she currently resides supposedly is not cutting it. Arroyo’s lawyers said they contacted Amal about taking the case in early 2015, to which she agreed. Again, she can pick and choose her cases. They are not “assigned” to her. She took Arroyo, she took Nasheed, she declined the UN hit piece on Israel, and she accepted her most recent case that of jailed journalist Khadija Ismayilova. If she is not sick now, it is almost guaranteed she will be soon. In any event, Nasheed supposedly has horrible, ridiculous back issues that cannot be treated anywhere in the world but the U.K. which is where, coincidentally, Amal lives and to where his wife and daughters moved recently. The medical leave was eventually granted. Thus began the next phase of the Clooney clownshow.
On December 18th, 2015, George and Amal Clooney attended The Prince’s Trust with the likes of Pierce Brosnan. It went largely unreported, but those who did know of their attendance wondered why. Could it be because later in the month, an overwhelming majority of the European Union parliament endorsed a resolution urging member states to “to introduce restrictive measures in the form of targeted sanctions to freeze the assets abroad of certain members of the Maldivian government and their leading supporters in the Maldivian business community, and to impose travel bans on them.” Conjecture, sure, but look what occurs a month later when the next phase of the PR frenzy began on January
12. Amal showed up for pics in Washington D.C with her colleague Jared Genser as he dropped off a list “provided to the U.S. government for sanctions targets (which) is clear and detailed, based on independent reporting of NGOs and media.” Media. This entire case is based on Wag the Dog type media promoted smoke and mirrors. Our “press” is just as culpable. On January 13, it was announced that “NBC Lands Amal Clooney Interview”. Touted as her first sit down American interview, she was given a nationally televised public platform to spew her propaganda. On January 14, her “In-Depth Interview” with
Cynthia McFadden aired. The next day she was on the Today show. “The government has refused to allow him out to get that surgery abroad, which is where it would be appropriate for it to be dispensed. And even locally, he hasn’t been able to get to a hospital to get that done. So it’s a really concerning situation”, Amal told NBC News. She also told them “democracy is dead” in the Maldives and that political repression, abuse of women, and
Islamic jihadism are on the rise. This woman is beyond shameless. Release her client or ISIS will attack? Actually it is quite the opposite. Ask Obama. He has said that a primary reason why people join ISIS is because they are poor and disenfranchised. Her requested sanctions has the potential to send the Maldives economy into a tailspin which would, by Obama’s theory, cause Islamic jihadism to rise. The liberals cannot keep their lies in order. Coincidentally, this was the same day “Freedom Now”, a US NGO, requested a travel ban and economic sanctions against the Maldives, a country which relies heavily on tourism for financial survival and would hurt the poor, women, and children of the tiny island nation the most as tourism is a huge source of their livelihood. What about their “human rights”?
Nasheed was given clearance to leave the Maldives for 30 days to supposedly get his back treated in the U.K., even though Maldives Foreign Minister Dunya Maumoon said the treatment required by Nasheed was minor, and that it could have easily been undertaken in the Maldives, but “It seems members of the opposition are intent in politicizing this situation”. This proved quite a true statement. The sudden change of heart by the Maldivian government came amid “a flurry of high-level diplomatic activity involving neighboring India, Sri Lanka, and former colonial power Britain….None of the countries has commented publicly on what was discussed during the visits, but diplomatic sources told AFP that backroom maneuvering had contributed to the decision to allow Nasheed to travel”. Background maneuvering? Who would have guessed? Furthermore, “Hugo Swire, Britain’s Minister of State in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, arrived in the
Maldivian capital on Saturday….By the time the ministerial duo returned to Colombo, President Yameen’s decision to release Nasheed at 12 noon last Saturday (January 16) had reached them. An over-enthusiastic Swire, who was privy to this, had then tweeted thanking the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister for ensuring ‘stability in the region.’ The tweet was to cause concerns at the highest levels of the Maldivian Government. It was cutting across what they were to announce via twitter on Saturday evening. A Male Foreign Ministry tweet said the Government had granted permission to Nasheed to travel ‘to UK to undergo surgery at his request.’ As a Male Foreign Ministry source, who spoke on grounds of anonymity, confessed, ‘What has stability in the region got to do with Nasheed undergoing surgery’?” She threatens ISIS attacks if he is not released, Swire threatens “stability in the region”….how would any of that change if he had medical attention for his back? They are threats to play on the public’s emotions, and sick ones at that, but ones that play into the Genser/Clooney playbook of mocking democracy for their desired outcomes.
The foreign ministry further said that it has now granted the concession “on the condition” that Mr. Nasheed return to the Maldives after the surgery to serve the remainder of his sentence. It was not clear how that demand would be enforced since “Mr. Nasheed’s wife Laila and their two daughters have been living in London since the ex-president was hauled back to the prison island in July after being briefly released on house arrest.” Asked whether she expected Nasheed to return, the Maldives foreign minister was noncommittal. “It’s difficult to predict,” said Maumoon, who is the daughter of the politician who ruled the Maldives for 30 years until Nasheed was elected in 2008. “We have to see how events unfold. He is a convicted criminal and he is serving a sentence for terrorism,” Maumoon added. “He is not being released. This is a specific clearance for a particular period of time.” She said that Nasheed is expected to fly back in 30 days if he does not have surgery, and 45 days if he has an operation. He can request an extension for medical reasons, she says. If he refuses, the Maldives can request his extradition, but the British Secretary of State would have to sign off on it. British Prime Minister David
Cameron recently described Nasheed to the Guardian as his “new best friend.” Mamoun said the biggest reason for Nasheed to return to a country that has branded him a terrorist for having a judge arrested while he was president is to try to get the conviction overturned by the courts and re-enter politics. The next election is in 2018. Make no mistake that has been the point all along…not “medical treatment” but to have time to lobby for international governments to apply pressure to the tiny island nations to him clear him so he can run again, even though the people have made it clear they do not want him thus more mocking of democracy. Amal Clooney cannot win on her own merit and facts of a case, so she bullies to get her way. Well…the money and powers that be behind her do. Her new last name can guarantee Entertainment Tonight will cover it, using manipulated language to for public sympathy from the low info voters.
The next day, January 17, Amal was on “Meet the Press” with Chuck Todd to discuss the topic in her 12-minute segment “a £1,111 Dolce & Gabbana dress, £105 Givenchy earrings and a pair of £690 black suede Prada boots, totaling nearly £2,000” while being billed “as media-savvy as her husband and knows how to use it to bring attention to global issues of which most Americans know nothing.” That is correct. Bring attention. That is her job. Then, since we are stupid, it is Amal’s job to spin through Hollywood how we are supposed to view the globalist agenda. We know George has been doing this for a long time. On January 21 a press release was sent out announcing January 25th as the date Amal and Nasheed would hold a press conference in London just so the media would not miss it.
That same day, Nasheed arrived in London. His lawyer awaited, arms outstretched, the paps obviously called to catch the “accomplished human rights attorney” greet her supposedly ailing client who was in dire need of medical attention. Just kidding! Nasheed all but skipped out of the airport. It is also worth noting that on the way out of the airport,
the cameramen takes a spill here while filming Amal is Jake Whitman, a NBC News producer, photojournalist and editor (the same NBC of Meet the Press, The Today Show, Cynthia McFadden & Nightline News, NBC World News with Lester Holt that aired Amal’s PR blitz). We know now that NBC is in the tank for the Clinton campaign. This guy was paid to fly to London to specifically follow her. She knows him by name. Yes, the Goebbelizaion of our media is long past the point of return.
At the January 25th press conference, throughout the discussion, Amal reiterated the need for targeted sanctions on Maldives regime leaders even though Nasheed was released for the medical treatment he supposedly so desperately needed. She said: “The case for sanctions is urgent. Even if President Nasheed is here with us, he has not been pardoned. We must continue not just for President Nasheed but for all the people of the Maldives, who are victims of human rights abuse,” she added. They are? Where? Who are these
“victims of human rights abuses” in the Maldives? Why would she not represent them since they are the actual downtrodden folks? The bigger issue here, though, is the continuing threat of economic sanctions to get her way. This guy arrested a judge he did not like and was put in prison for it. If democracy is dead, Amal Clooney helped kill it. She is throwing out not just democracy but the rule of law and the sovereignty of a nation. Remember she is a big supporter of open borders, the Responsibility to Protect, and Restrain the Veto. She has no use for a nation’s sovereignty or its laws. Neither does her husband.
How far will she go to win? If her economic terrorism does not work, there is always a travel boycott. “We haven’t come out and called for an all-out tourist boycott yet, but at the same time I don’t think we would exclude it. Tourists have the power of the purse,” she said recently. The Maldives, an island nation with virtually no natural resources, depends heavily on its world-famous upmarket tourism for much its revenue. The industry also employs a sizeable majority of its workforce. For someone who claims to care about “human rights” and whose husband is some supposed “humanitarian”, leaving the poor of a country to fend for themselves for their own personal gain seems quite the antithesis of that. Ahmed Adheeb, the Vice President of the Maldives, said, “Now, in an attempt to punish both the democratically elected Government and people of the Maldives for merely enforcing their own laws Nasheed’s legal team are threatening to lobby for international sanctions. These would hurt not only those in the administration but, more painfully, the citizens of the Maldives who depend on the tourism industry for their livelihoods. They would have a whole nation suffer for the purposes of publicity and because the legal arguments in favor of Nasheed are untenable.” In addition, the radical Islam jihad with which Amal claims to be concerned would happen as a result of her
sanctions, not in lieu of his release. In a research paper, Iromi Dharmawardhane, a Senior Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, said “Jihadist activity and a radicalized community have been visibly growing in the past decade in the Maldives. Boycotting the tourism industry of Maldives will contribute to further radicalization of the country’s population, he warned. The paper, published in the RSIS Commentary which identifies itself as a platform to provide timely and policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments, said the Maldives is a fertile ground for jihadist recruitment. The growth of jihadism in the Maldives is a serious security concern, particularly for India and other South Asian countries, it said. According to the expert, in order to counter Islamic fundamentalism, the Maldives needs help, not isolation. A boycott of its tourism industry would inflict great suffering on the already poor country, as tourism is its main industry and source of income, he added.
As such, the Government of the Maldives rightfully criticized Nasheed for “exploiting” the terms of a 30-day medical release to embark on a “lobbying and media campaign abroad”. Nasheed has been “biding his time” for his chance in the spotlight for some time. Now was the time to grab it. Hours before the press conference, the foreign ministry said in a statement that since Nasheed’s arrival in London, “his party, aides and advisors had organized multiple meetings and media engagements with the sole aim of politicizing his trip. Nasheed’s ability to undergo this busy itinerary undermines the notion that his medical condition was grave enough to warrant treatment abroad”. The government also noted its “profound disappointment” that a “member of its London high commission was denied entry to Nasheed’s forthcoming press conference, despite a request many days in advance. This is in stark contrast to the unimpeded access given to the press conferences of Amal Clooney and Nasheed’s US advisers during their last visit to the Maldives”, it said. “This is not medical leave, but media leave,” foreign minister
was quoted as saying in the statement.“Mr. Nasheed’s PR advisers’ vetting of attendees at his press conference reveals, as many in the Maldives witnessed during his tenure as president, that he does not practice what he preaches when it comes to freedom of speech.” Neither do the Clooneys. Regardless, “The opportunity for Mr. Nasheed to clear his name remains in the Maldives, not in the TV studios of London or Los Angeles. The Supreme Court appeal in Mr Nasheed’s conviction will continue while he meets politicians and the media in London. We look forward to his return and wish him speedy recovery from his medical treatment.” His 30 days expired towards the end of February. By all accounts he is still in the U.K. and has not had surgery. So where is this case now? Making a mockery of democracy more every day.
Amal Clooney’s handlers now have all her major “career” events spun accordingly to coincide with any Hollywood event her husband has scheduled. Nasheed’s “release” followed the January 25th press conference that came just before the February 5th release of George’s Hail Caesar, a comedy produced by the Cohen brothers who, in August of 2014, a month before the wedding, signed a pro-Israel statement criticizing Hamas with 190 other members of the Hollywood community. It must have been awkward when Amal
visited the set, if she ever did. In any event, the movie tanked. It has the distinction of being the least commercially viable Cohen movie to date. Scarlett Johannsen was nowhere to be round on the red carpet. It was the Amal show, including putting the appropriate public spin and pressure on the Maldives via the media. Thus far it has not worked. By all accounts he is still in the U.K., has not had surgery, and the Maldives have not caved.
Then, on April 6th the ruling Progressive Party of the Maldives-dominated parliament “approved today amendments to the 2009 Privileges and Protection for Former Presidents Act to withdraw state benefits for ex-presidents convicted and sentenced to jail for a criminal offence committed during his presidency.” Then, on April 8th, the Maldives government refused to extend Nasheed’s medical leave and ordered him to return to serve the remainder of his 13 year sentence. A Maldives Correctional Service spokesman told pro-government website Avas that Nasheed’s request for medical leave extension was incomplete. “Since the documents are incomplete and because we have doubts over their authenticity, we have asked Nasheed to return yesterday [Wednesday],” Hassan Ali said. Besides, Nasheed now wants his name cleared as the end game so he can run again in 2018. What is a fame hungry girl with a large media platform but still with a horrible professional track record to do? Turn to Jared Gensler and their cronies in Congress to bully the tiny island nation into capitulation, thus mocking democracy and the sovereign laws of their nation.
There stood Jared and Amal on April 9th in Washington D.C. with Soros buddies Patrick Leahy and John McCain after the United States senate unanimously adopted Thursday “a bipartisan resolution calling on the Maldivian government to redress the ‘injustice’ of former President Mohamed Nasheed’s imprisonment and release other political prisoners” because, as discussed with regards to all things “climate”, “The Maldives is “strategically important due to its location, which straddles major trade routes in the Indian Ocean.” The resolution – which expresses the sense of the senate and is not enforceable – was submitted in November by a coalition of 13 senators from both the
Republican and Democratic parties after a UN rights panel declared Nasheed’s terrorism conviction illegal and politically motivated. No doubt if checked, one would find these 13 senators all had associations with the same handlers. Regardless, once again the Maldives stood firm saying, “The government has the utmost respect for the integrity of the US Senate and the dignity of the US government, but it is clear that the senate has considered
this matter without being aware of the full facts of this case.” Oh they are aware of the facts. Hence the public pressure and lobbying continued with lawmakers moving up the ranks to Secretary of State John Kerry with a letter dated April 12th which stated: “We would urge the administration to consider all of the options at its disposal, which might be effective in influencing the government’s behavior,” McCain said. Yes, we know. On April 24th, home minister Umar Naseer said a decision will be made regarding ex-president Mohamed Nasheed’s medical release within this week, after reviewing Medical Board’s decision on the matter. They did not cave and demanded his return. As a
result,“conservative” Prime Minister Cameron and the UK government granted Nasheed asylum. Amal Clooney, junior barrister, winner of no cases in court, leader of no cases until she got married with a public platform to bully these tiny nations, supposed “human rights” defender, used a Goebelized press to “apply pressure” to get Nasheed “released”, mocking the outcomes of a democratic process that did not meet her handlers needs. Her handlers got their guy, and she got pap walks in designer duds. Win-win. social media, show Nasheed being pushed forward at quite a speed.
Soros’s “Democracy Now!” was quick to push the talking points. Keep in mind as this story unfolds that the point has always been to force the Soros and Muslim Brotherhood backed Nasheed back into power. Further proof Amal allowed herself to be used to mock democracy and the rule of law of a sovereign nation? Here is a link to video of Nasheed chair racing on June 6, 2016 in England. The video “Showed the animated 49-year-old yelling to go faster as he hurtled by on a swivel chair – before being knocked out of the
race as another opponent smashed into him… Footage, which emerged on social media, show Nasheed being pushed forward at quite a speed. The laughing politician appears caught up in the excitement as he clings to the seat of the chair with both hands”. Sure. “Back” problems so bad that he needed surgery clear across the globe. Kudos to the Maldives standing up for democracy as the Clooneys and Cameron spit on it. Since then, John Podesta’s Group has been hired by the Maldives government for the monthly sum of $50,000 to “whitewash their crimes”.
Chapter 15: Khadija Ismayilova
Another cherry picked case that she can again claim to be pro “freedom of expression” is that of jailed Azerbaijan “journalist” Khadija Ismayilova . On January 16, Amal “offered her services” to Ismayilova. Clooney said she would serve as co-counsel on the ECHR case with the Media Legal Defence Initiative, a British charitable organization with ties to Soros’s Open Society Initiative. This, however, was news to Khadijia’s legal team: “Throwing a twist in the tale, the government-aligned Trend news agency, however, cited Ismayilova’s two Azerbaijani lawyers, Fakhraddin Mehdiyev and Fariz Namazli, as saying they know nothing about Clooney’s involvement in the case. They could not be reached for confirmation of the report.” In addition, Amal’s request to take the case came under immediate scrutiny. Those who question her involvement in this case focused on the Armenia case she lost against a Turkish politician in the same European Court of Human Rights. The feeling exists that Amal is on an anti-Turkic binge.
Turkey and Azerbaijan share Turkic ties and, as close allies, both oppose Armenia on Karabakh, “Anti-Turkic activities indeed helped Amal, a Lebanese by origin with close roots to large Armenian community in her motherland, to get distinguished in her lawyer career,” opined journalist Gunal Camal in her piece for AzerNews. The reporter maintained that the said “anti-Turkic” spree is Clooney’s “bid to catch up [with] with her husband [Hollywood star George Clooney]’s fame” and, no doubt, his “100 Lives” initiative. However, there is also, in addition to her anti-free speech case, the “100 Lives” initiative commemorating the Armenian genocide and the ties to Amal’s family? All coincidence, surely. In addition, several members of the international press claimed, “Clooney Targets Turkic States in her Path to Fame”:
“Mrs. Clooney, whose international profile was raised when she married American actor George Clooney in Italy, seems trying hard to prove all that she also can be a celebrity and likely with the advice of Armenian lobbyists targeted the Turkic states in her “path of fame”. Amal Clooney took on the controversial case in early 2015 and was part of a team representing Armenia against Turkish politician Doğu Perinçek, chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party, convicted by Switzerland for denying the so-called Armenian genocide.
In October last year, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled it is not a crime to deny mass killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turkey in 1915 was a ”genocide”. Thus, Mrs. Clooney in her first attempt failed to rival her Oscar winner husband, but this scandalous case, to be true, enormously raised her popularity. So, deeply committed to anti-Turkic ideals Amal Clooney now has taken to Azerbaijan, first to prove her loyalty to Armenian lobbyists and second, to undersign another big case without caring who wins. Mrs. Clooney, strongly keeping her shattered background as human rights fighter, has decided to indulge into fighting for human rights even not knowing exactly who she is defending. In her televised interview for VOA she did not name even her client, just calling her “courageous women”. Khadija Ismayilova, or the ‘courageous women’ as Amal Clooney named, in fact was enough courageous to make money by illegal means while working for Radio Liberty.
Khadija, working at the media structure financed by the U.S. Congress, was able to make illegal money by inking commercial deals and covered her spivvery with the so-called fight against corruption.”
They are right. Facts are anathema to Amal. Her job is to bring the press to apply public pressure to have the outcome work in the favor of her handlers, and she knows it. Amal told the BBC that she believes international pressure could help free Khadija, who has been serving a seven-and-a-half-year sentence since late 2015 for alleged abuse of power, tax evasion, illegal business activity and embezzlement. “We know that diplomatic pressure can work on the [Azerbaijani] government because what we had happened in the last month,” Clooney said, referring to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s pardon of internationally recognized political prisoners ahead of a visit to Washington in late March where she met with two other George Soros buddies, Patrick Lahey and John McCain (who helped with Nasheed) as well as Mark Kirk. She pursued the same rhetoric about
“democracy” and “humanitarian” and “human rights” that even though it was glaringly obvious that this case, as with the Armenian speech case and the “100 Lives” initiative, was handpicked for her due to her current public profile to get those on her handlers side to apply “political pressure” against the Turks. As she had shown in the past, if this pressure did not work, she could lie about Khadija’s medical condition to procure her release. It happened in Egypt with Fahmy. It happened with Nasheed. With Nasheed, she reminded the press from Egypt she would be in the Maldives. The press willingly followed. She announced her participation to the press during her “Meet the Press” segment in February, met with the aforementioned Senators in March, and in May, “backed by Amal Clooney”, she was “freed”. According to her lawyer, Fariz Namazli (because, as stated, Amal was NOT her attorney. Two were already on the case when Amal asked to have her name attached to it), “The Supreme Court had dropped charges of embezzlement and abuse of power charges but kept the charges of tax evasion and illegal business activity. Under the terms of probation, Ismayilova is required to reside in Baku, the capital, and is forbidden from traveling abroad for five years without official permission.” Yeah. We will see how that goes. She might just need “medical treatment” after all…to seek asylum elsewhere…maybe England? Regardless, a dangerous precedent has been set. This woman with no legal standing whatsoever marries a Hollywood actor, parades around in haute couture to get the entertainment media to fawn over her and create a narrative that she cares about “human rights” and then manipulates that narrative to get criminals that are of political significance to her handlers “released” from prison mocking the very democracy and “human rights” they claim to support.
Chapter 16: Arroyo and the Philippines
There are other cases, too, in which she defends human rights violators as she did before she got married; therefore, they receive less publicity . First is the case of President Gloria Arroyo of the Philippines. Once again, Amal is defending a human rights violator, not the “little people” she and her husband pretend to champion. According to PolitEkon, “International human rights lawyer Amal Clooney just doesn’t have any business interfering with the Philippine judicial system. Instead of trying to defend the case she filed before the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) for and on behalf of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, she should have taken the case of the victims who were defrauded by the rich families of Arroyo…Arroyo has her mega-powerful and influential array of lawyers to see to it that there will be no miscarriage of justice. Clooney also did not take into consideration that Arroyo should have been put in a regular jail already and suffer just like any other criminal that was sentenced by the courts”. Another lawmaker in the Philippines, Rep Neri Colmeanares, said that Amal should “devote her legal prowess to helping the countless victims of injustice in the Philippines…it would be better if she focuses on those who are unable to seek legal aid because of their
socioeconomic status”. Silly man. Amal does not work for the poor. Neither does her husband. They care about money and have utilized the “human rights” mantra to guilt lots of people into parting with their money to give to them. In addition, in true globalist fashion, Arroyo also has attempted to help balkanize the Philippines with “Resolution No. 10”, described by Perry Diaz of Global Balita as “a blueprint for the Balkanization of the Philippines. What was once the “Pearl of the Orient” could become a chopped-up archipelago in a sea teeming with infernal warfare” between, yes, Muslims and Christians. Then there was her trip to the UN back in September. No one really reported on that. Oh, the media focused on her Dolce and Gabbana green dress at the O Brother Where Art Thou? 15-year anniversary celebration in NYC and an obscenely expensive red “work” outfit, but no one seemed to mention the actual “work” she was doing at the UN that day. That is because while one hand was waving around that “ethically mined diamond” to distract the pop culture masses, she was at the UN pushing the aforementioned “Restrain the Veto” initiative requesting nations give up their sovereign vote to allow the UN to take out Assad in Syria and then proceed with balkanizing it. As the pop culture press pushed her “fashion icon status” and the “greatest love story ever” on us, she was actively advocating for war, or, rather, “regime change” as a “human rights” issue.
Chapter 17: Amal-Public Speaker
Since Amal’s legal career is publicly manipulated at best since she has no legitimate wins as a team and has never led one, and the role she so seemingly wishes to attain as the new Jackie-O of the fashion world has fallen flat, she seems to be repackaging herself as some sort of public speaker. This started in the spring of 2015 when she “guest lectured” at Columbia University. About what we have no idea as the supporter of “free speech” and “transparent governments” had those attending her lecture submit to some sort of non-disclosure agreement. “We are under strict orders not to discuss her or anything about her class,” said a student who declined to give her name. A representative from the law school politely asked a reporter to leave. The same occurred in the spring of 2016. In the spring of 2016 she took her “lecturing” skills from the classroom to the public, still with restrictions.
Next, Amal keynoted the 13th Annual WINGS Luncheon on Thursday, April 14th, 2016 in Dallas, TX. The woman who defends terrorists and violators of human rights, especially those of women and homosexuals, was touted by an organization that does actual work with victims of sex trafficking as a “a perfect voice to advocate against a crime that is happening in our own backyard”. Really? Because she has said nothing about the horrors of 1,400 White Children in Rotherdam raped by Muslim men from 1997 to 2013 in her “backyard” in England. She also has said nothing about sex slaves in Muslim and Communist countries such as Cuba and China. One would think as the ninth ranked most “influential Arab under 40”, she would use her very public platform to condemn the “human rights” violations of radical Muslim extremists groups and Sharia Law and its horrible treatment of women and gays. This group also claims “Her recent work as of 2015 has been in the field of advocating for the protection of women against physical and sexual violence in combat zones”. Really? Where? With Qaddafi’s kid? The King of Bahrain? The Elgin Marbles? The Muslim Brotherhood leader’s kid in Ireland? The Egyptian journalist? Where? Although she claimed to support the “human rights” of those being trafficked for sex, according to writer Joanne Wolf, Amal raised other people’s money for this charity but
supposedly donated no money of her own. Wolf stated, “Ironically, Amal could have contributed a million dollars herself, simply by forgoing a few phone-calls to Saks Fifth Avenue, but then there would be no publicity so scrap that idea.” The local papers did try to help push her “star power” claiming it pushed the luncheon to a $1 million tally; however, that fell short of the $1.1 million that Kevin Costner, a real movie star, brought in the prior year. She attended a “human rights” conference for a photo op. Period. The charade must be kept up in order for the “public pressure” in her politically motivated cases to work. Either “New Friends New Life” is on the globalist payroll or they really have no clue and should be given one because having her on their roster destroys their credibility.
Amal had another chance to “fix” her public relations disasters with a couple of speaking engagements in the Gulf region. Instead, she used it as a platform to undermine sovereignty, democracy, and free speech with her false narratives. Here she blamed the “…three Rs responsible for the crackdown on freedom of speech in today’s world — royalty, rulers and religion. The state needs to understand that stifling criticism can have serious repercussions.” Which case in the Gulf, land of human rights oppression, did she bring up to defend his? Nasheed. She claimed to have “won” Nasheed’s case in defense of “free speech”. However, she was not his legal counsel, his time to appeal had long expired, and he is only out due to falsification of a medical condition. He was not found “not guilty”. She mocks democracy at every turn. She also stated, “Line should not be drawn between freedom of speech and secession but between freedom of speech and inciting violence. There can be debates about changing governments and changing territories as long as they don’t call for violence.” Funny. Neither she nor her husband spoke out against the George Soros funded Occupy and Black Lives Matter movements that have destroyed private property, shut down businesses, and killed cops. As for “freedom of speech”, Amal had a tight grip on what parts of this speech the public got to hear. Of a 28 minute speech, only six minutes were released. Surely this has everything to do with the recent hack revelation that Soros’s Open Society Foundation have actively trained socialist MEPs in Europe to combat “populist” parties and shut down free speech?
From India, she moved onto the United Arab Emirates to speak before a large contingent of Gulf state leaders. This would have been the perfect opportunity to call out not the human rights violations of these nations, especially the “migrants” of which the Clooneys have grown so fond. The UAE is being investigated for its treatment of migrant workers building a multibillion dollar cultural hub. According to the Guardian, “Contractors failed to pay wages for months at a time, did not renew work permits and residence visas, and refused to pay the end-of-service benefits to which workers were entitled, leaving them destitute”. Did Amal address these human rights violations when she had the chance? Nope. Nor did she mention of the Orwellian surveillance laws in place in the Gulf or the war crimes Gulf States may be committing in Yemen. Nor did she call out the mistreatment of gays and women under Sharia Law. Instead, she beseeched them to meet criticism of their ruling systems “with dialogue, not prison terms”, and that “protests be met with ‘crowd control’, not bullets’. She even went so far as to say “tweets should be met with tweets, not prison terms”. It should shock no one, then, that the Soros leaks reveal that he is one of the biggest pushes behind “criminal justice reform” in the U.S. not for “fairness” or “equality” but votes.
The Clooneys are not concerned with the human rights violations in these mostly Sharia run countries because their goal is to silence dissenters of open borders through cries of “islamophobia” and “xenophobia” especially where the “migrant crisis” is concerned specifically in the United States. On Monday, December 28th, 2015, the Clooneys’ employer, George Soros , publically called on voters to “resist the siren song of the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz” in an op-ed for The Guardian entitled “The Terrorists and Demagogues Want Us to be Scared. We Mustn’t Give In”. From there, as expected, he goes on to condemn the non-existent “Islamophobia” of the likes of Cruz and Trump and says we must “reaffirm our commitment to the principles of an open society”. George and Amal then used their public platforms not to condemn terrorism or the genocide of Christians by Muslim extremists worldwide but to use it to label the “right wing extremists”, who, at this rate, are anyone in the world who do not agree with their globalists politics, and their “xenophobia” the real problem in order to push the “open borders” “open society” agenda.
Chapter 18: Clooney’s Scottish Soros Spectacular
The same goes for George. Since the Italian wedding spectacular, his movie career has tanked with three major commercial flops. “Mr. Humanitarian” George Clooney has also done little to no philanthropic work compared to previous endeavors since the South Sudan split. However, he did in November of 2015 go to Scotland to hand out sandwiches to the homeless. Not really. He went for a photo op with ten locals to remind the world that he used to be “Mr. Everyman” and a supposed supporter of “humanitarian” causes….before heading off to a conference of rich 1% globalists to bring “awareness” to “the important impact charitable donations can have in making a difference in the world”, says John Prendergast, Not on Our Watch official and close friend of George Soros. Anything “charitable” Clooney does is affiliated with Soros because he is a globalist. He is not now nor has ever been “Mr. Everyman”. As we will find, this endeavor does not help Scotland, it’s locals, nor the downtrodden. It is being used to push the decline of national borders and sovereignties via “humanitarianism” via the “refugee” crisis.
If, after all we have discovered about George Clooney’s “humanitarianism” in Africa, one finds it difficult to believe a sandwich shop owner in Scotland called Clooney’s people up one day to see if he would mind bringing “awareness” to the plight of the homeless there, that person would be wise to be skeptical. Social Bite, the “a small sandwich shop in Edinburgh with the idea that we’d make whatever salary we need, donate all profits to charity, and commit to training and giving jobs to homeless people” has “reached out” to George Clooney to bring “awareness” to their “humanitarian” objectives. The same “awareness” Clooney brought to the Sudan long enough for it to break free for him, Nespresso, and Soros’ brother to lay claim to the coffee fields, as others laid claim to the oil? The Sudan has since slid right back into civil war, and, except for the random op-ed penned by someone else and signed by him, Clooney has all but disappeared. His “awareness” is no longer needed there on such a grand scale so he now wants to bring his “awareness” to Scotland on a much smaller scale?. How noble. But for what cause? And, as with the subjective language of payment in the Sudan, how much is a “salary we need”? As with all of other Clooney’s “humanitarian” endeavors, speculating requires analyzing the ties that those supporting the endeavor have to Clooney’s globalist puppets. It seems the reality of this trip for Clooney is to shill for the elites at the Scottish Business Awards supported by the Royal Bank of Scotland where attendees willing to pay £10,000 for a “platinum package” will get special access to him. One of the main backers of this endeavor is the Hunter Foundation .
One core principal of the Hunter Foundation is that “philanthropy is not a substitute for government investment.” Yes, progressives, we know that government knows best how we should run our lives and spend our money. Not just any government, either, but “global” bodies like the UN who should determine how sovereign nations should be forced to operate. In any event, when asked about issues with which its foundation plans on dealing with in the future, notice the language of this statement: “In Rwanda, we’re also currently developing a hybrid social enterprise that blends capitalism and social benefit whereby we’re investing in a food oil manufacturing facility that will work with farmers (100,000+) to produce for the factory. Our profits will be reinvested for the common good but our co-investors are all firmly there for the profit; I guess it’s a Yunus+ model and it will be interesting to see how that develops.” More about the “Yunus model” can be found here. It works much like the cronyism involved in “humanitarian” economics as in it never does…at least not for the poor. Perhaps that explains Mr. Yunus’ close ties to Mr. Soros who collapses economies for personal financial gain at the expense of the “little guy”?
Remember the subjective language used by the globalists to justify their looting of resources worldwide. “Climate change” per the UN head has nothing to do with the environment but is being used to establish a new form of global economics that eliminates free market capitalism, turning the global economy over to the globalists with the citizens as their workers. “Hybrid social enterprise” that “blends capitalism and social benefit” is that. All of the money made will go to “a food, oil manufacturing facility that will work with farmers…to produce for the ‘common good’”. “Common good”…sounds a lot like these two:
Then, as with Clooney’s “Sustainable Nespresso” whatever, “Our profits will be reinvested for the common good but our co-investors are all firmly there for the profit”. See…profit is good for the elites, not the rest of us, for they know what is best for the “common good”, and it is okay for them to profit from the rape of natural resources in Africa because they give enough back to the “Common good” or, in Clooney’s case “to lift farmers out of poverty “or in Social Bites case “we’d make whatever salary we need”. Which is how much, exactly? How utterly subjective is that language? This looting of Africa has gone forever, and the rich get richer as the poor get poorer because it is “humanitarianism” disguised as a wealth redistribution scheme.
Two primary board members of the Hunter Foundation are Sir Tom Hunter, entrepreneur and philanthropist who received the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy in 2013 and, yes, Vartan Gregorian, see the “100 Lives” initiative. After discussions with Vartan Gregorian, head of the Carnegie Foundation in New York, and getting a large investment from him, Sir Tom Hunter found himself on board with the globalists when he “set a cause and a method which has resulted in the foundation donating “in excess of £50m to supporting, educational and entrepreneurial projects in Scotland and sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa in partnership with former President Bill Clinton through the Clinton Hunter Development Initiative.” Aww…what a nice rich guy, until one analyzes the language. “Sustainable development” in “Suh Saharan Africa” with money from Vartan Gregorian? Where have we heard that before?
As we ask with George, we, too, must ask Hunter why Africa? Are there not enough poor people in poverty in Scotland, the US, or other areas of the world that could use their financial help? Yes, there are, but neither have the resources available for exploitation that Africa does. The book “The Looting Machine: Warlords, Oligarchs, Corporations, Smugglers, and the Theft of Africa’s Wealth” by Tom Burgis shows “great ambition, laying out the individual strands of the warp and woof of a huge tapestry of disparate individuals and business entities around the world systematically looting sub-Saharan Africa…. Many people loudly lament the steady injection into such nations of fruitless foreign aid and economic assistance. But the rewards of looting are so substantial that they provide huge incentives for maintaining the status quo. The aid flow into Africa, Burgis notes, is tiny compared with the value of the exploited resources flowing in the other direction…. So, the abuses will continue even if this or that shell corporation, corrupt African president or foreign robber baron is exposed, Burgis laments.” Yes, the incentive is there for the globalists to perpetuate war, retaining the status quo in areas such as Sudan, for massive financial gain. However, as long as what they are doing is deemed “humanitarian”, no one should EVER question it.
Keep that in mind when investigating some of the “beneficial projects” with which Tom Hunter has been affiliated where Africa is concerned. In September 2004, the “Make Poverty History” campaign was officially launched as the “UK mobilization of an international coalition, the Global Call to Action Against Poverty (G-CAP), led by Oxfam International, Action Aid and DATA – the controversial Africa charity set up by U2 front man, Bono [one of George’s best friends] and multi-billionaires, George Soros [yes, that Soros], and Microsoft’s Bill Gates, the world’s second richest person with a fortune of just under $50 billion.” They could work to “Make Poverty History” by donating their own massive wealth, but that is not ever an option, it seems. Pay attention to the language here: “ MPH’s policy demands on the UK government are fairly radical, especially its calls for “trade justice not free trade”, which would require G8 and EU countries, notably the
UK, to stop forcing through free market policies on poor countries as part of aid, trade deals or debt relief. MPH also says rich countries should immediately double aid by $50bn per year and finally meet 35-year old promises to spend 0.7 per cent of their national income in development aid. More and better aid, meanwhile, should be matched by cancellation of the “unpayable” debts of the world’s poorest countries through a “fair and transparent international process” that uses new money, not slashed aid budgets” New money, stop “free market”, “erase debt”, “rich” countries should “immediately double” aid…end the capitalism upon which the U.S. economy is base in lieu of a new “wealth redistribution” based global economy. Remember this is the goal of “Climate Change” and “Sustainability” via the U. N.
Clooney has been on board with this elimination of national sovereignty and pro global banking system in exchange for the 1% ruling the rest for a long time as already documented. This trip to Scotland is no different. His puppet masters told him to show up to agenda push. It is no surprise that his “sustainable” Nespresso campaign and this “sustainable” Scotland campaign both of which deal with redistribution of wealth to the globalists’ pet projects in Africa are being touted by Clooney just before the climate talks in Paris. The “green scheme” was a big payoff for him as it is a huge part of the globalist wealth redistribution agenda.
It makes sense, then, that the last time, Clooney was in Scotland “professionally” was for Tom Hunter’s backed Live 8 in July of 2005, the same year Clooney was picked to head the “humanitarian” missions in Sudan. Bob Geldof, Clooney BFF Bono the coalition of NGOs and church groups that comprised “Make Poverty History” asked us to “believe that (Bush and Blair) (could) be won over to the cause of the poor and oppressed” to justify “helping” in Africa. Geldof “hailed the pre-(G8) summit announcement that there would be a debt forgiveness package for some countries in sub-Saharan Africa as a ‘victory for millions,’ claiming, ‘Tomorrow 280 million Africans will wake up for the first time in their lives without owing you or me a penny’”. Wrong. Even the World socialists understood what a scam all of this “humanitarianism for Africa” was about when they declared, “What nonsense! In the first instance, Africa’s poor do not owe ‘you and me’ anything. Their debts are to major corporations, financial institutions, imperialist governments and multilateral organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. None of these contemplate any measures to seriously alleviate Africa’s plight because they are intent on perpetuating the exploitation of the continent.” Exactly.
Furthermore, Michael Chussodovsky, a Canadian economist and contributor to “The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order” states, ““Most casual observers might assume that the money generated by corporate sponsors, DVD sales, performance royalties and direct contributions would be funneled into various charitable organizations aiding the poorest people of developing nations around the world. They would be wrong.” Instead, as Chussodovsky illustrates the money raised in almost every instance is used to pay off the corporate creditors of indebted countries. In effect, the entire focus of the money generated by Live8 was to provide direct funds to corporations that were ‘owed money’ by these impoverished nations. What is even worse, according to Chussodovsky, is that” those same monetary amounts contributed by Live8 to these private corporations to provide more relief to them for the money they had lent to these impoverished nations was then deducted from the direct aid packages and social service programs formerly contributed by the G8 to these countries”. As Chussodovsky also clearly states, “For each dollar of ‘debt cancellation’ to the international financial institutions, the G8 will reduce the flow of foreign aid to these countries. In other words, the foreign aid earmarked to finance much needed social programs will now go directly into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank.” So what was being promoted around the world as a “humanitarian effort” to help some of the poorest countries on the planet was actually an exercise in paying off international financial institutions for aid they had previously lent these nations, while guaranteeing the reduction of the same amount in future funding for these very programs. Stealing from the poor to give to the rich. Classy. That said, remember who Hunter said inspired him to enter into this type of “philanthropy”: Vartan Gregorian of the “100 Lives Initiative”.
All this begs the question: why Scotland for this event? No…it is not because of these “socially just” sandwich shops. Please. Social Bite was founded in 2012 to employ local homeless people and donates all profits to solving social problems at home and abroad. Noble. They do. There is no existence to prove otherwise. In this same year, Josh Littlejohn established the Scottish Business Awards, which is where George is going to give his keynote. This is where the story falls apart a bit. Josh says he approached George in January of 2015 after recognizing George’s humanitarian work. However, his partner Alice Thompson, said in a separate interview it was she who persuaded George Clooney to come
to Scotland for “lunch.” Sure…lunch. Consider further down in the article, Alice states that “Social Bite’s annual turnover is £1.5million and all the profits – around £5000 a month – are split between Shelter Scotland, Vision Eye Care Hospital in Bangladesh, MicroLoan Foundation in Malawi and Zambia, and the STV Appeal.” The monthly profits are 5,000/month, and only one quarter (1,250/month) goes to Scotland? The rest goes to….Africa ? Why does any of this money have to go to Africa? They pay their homeless employees a “living wage” and then say, “Oh you’ve made enough, so now we’re sending the rest to Africa”. Are there no other poor people, children, and elderly in Scotland who could benefit from that? Of course, but the point is getting “regular” people to “donate” money to their “humanitarian” slush funds that line the elites pockets. Keep in mind that Clooney as their “advocate” makes $20 million per movie, already made $40 million from Nespresso while owing 4 mansions around the globe, travels on private jets leaving behind an epic carbon footprint, has his Casamigos tequila manufactured in Mexico away from U.S. taxes and a mandated minimum wage, and saying nothing much about the cheaper foreign workers brought in by Disney to replace the American ones to help offset the losses of films such as the commercial disaster known as Tomorrowland. Now all these poor legal citizens are out of jobs so corporate Disney can protect its profits. Tsk Tsk. BUT George is a ‘humanitarian” who donated $1,000 during his photo op to bring “awareness” to “social justice” issues worldwide (that in turn line his bank account). As Obama says, “at some point you’ve made too much money”. You and me. Not the globalists. They will tell us when we have made enough.
Back to the “Why Scotland?” question… What political occurrences there matter to the globalists? Because with Clooney it is all politics all the time. Flashback to 2014. Scotland was to vote on whether to break from the U.K. to become an independent sovereign nation again. As one who forces the balkanization of nations worldwide from the Ukraine to Thailand to the Sudan as his form of “democracy”, one might assume Soros and the globalists would have been for this action; however, as he is a primary builder and financial backer of the E. U. as a “one world unified government” is their goal, no…they are against it. Greece, Scotland, Catalonia..they cannot have these nationalist movements win because they will break up their “global union” utopia. Therefore, Soros warned of the dangers facing the currency if Scotland became independent. Speaking at an event in London, he told ITV News that Scotland would have a “very difficult relationship” with the rest of the UK if it tried to keep sterling (the British currency) and it “would not be practical” for Scotland to remain with the Bank of England. However, he also warned it would be “inefficient and potentially dangerous” for Scotland to create its own currency, because “currencies can be attacked and speculated against. And when you have a weak currency, positions can be taken”. Warned? Sounds more like threatened. Speculating against currencies, making countries weak, and then being in a position to “take” them is how Soros makes his living.
Let’s keep this in mind, too, that this event is being sponsored by the Royal Scottish Bank, which announced that they would move their headquarters to London in the event of a Yes vote in the Scottish referendum. Another threat. Of course, the RSB is now under scrutiny for bad money practices which have been fleecing the exact clients they claimed they were trying to help. Sounds familiar. The RBS, once a “colossus with a balance sheet nearly twice the size of the British economy, had deliberately pushed small businesses to bankruptcy so it could pick up their assets cheaply. For three years, the bank has vigorously denied the allegations about its Global Restructuring Group (GRG). But the meeting at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) convinced McEwan outright denial was no longer an option, according to insiders. Now, they say, the 300-year-old lender is considering a compensation scheme for small firms – from tire makers to nursing home operators – which say GRG abused them or forced them out of business. The cost to the bank, rescued during the financial crisis by British taxpayers, could run to billions of pounds.” That is the Soros way. Cause chaos, cause collapse, swoop in to pick up the cheap pieces, and leave the taxpayer with the bill. This is for whom Clooney spoke while in Scotland.
Odd that Tom Hunter and “Mr. Democracy” Clooney, who had no trouble voicing his support for the Soros led rebellions in the Ukraine, Sudan, and elsewhere, had no opinion. The glaringly obvious explanation for that is the time of the referendum…September 2014. Wedding month. Amal rescinded her position on the Israeli hit council for the UN supposedly to avoid bad publicity during wedding month. George had nothing to say about anything political during that month. They had a narrative to set. Announcing their stance on the pro globalist agenda was not in the cards when trying to establish public favor as the “greatest humanitarian power couple on earth”.
Chapter 19: Their First Joint UN Endeavor-100 Lives Initiative
The Clooneys took on their first joint task with what they consider one of the biggest genocide atrocities of the modern era-the systematic slaughter of Christians and Jews worldwide by radical Muslim extremists. -the Armenian Genocide that occurred between 1915 and 1923. Yes. The Clooneys want to fight genocide from 100 years ago because there seems to not be any happening in their backyards right now. As with everything related to the Clooneys, the Armenian Genocide will prove a “humanitarian” and “human rights” cover to push the “islamophobia” mantra as way to “control speech” while pushing “open borders” via the “migrant crisis”.
On January 11, 2015. Los Angeles hosted the Golden Globes. The Clooneys made their first red carpet appearance as husband and wife. Almost immediately thereafter, Amal appeared on a case to prosecute the free speech victory of a man named Perineck. This gentleman denied the Armenian Genocide occurred. Ridiculous as the statement may be, true free speech involves speech in which not everyone agrees. In Switzerland where this man, Perineck, made his proclamation, it is illegal to deny the Armenian genocide, so he was charged so he was charged with a speech violation. In a victory for free speech, he won. According to Reuters:
“A Swiss court had fined the leader of the leftist Turkish Workers’ Party, Dogu Perincek, for having branded talk of an Armenian genocide ‘an international lie’ during a 2007 lecture tour in Switzerland”. However, “the European Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday in a case involving Switzerland…denying that mass killings of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey in 1915 were genocide is not a criminal offence…The court, which upholds the 47-nation European Convention on Human Rights, said a Swiss law against genocide denial violated the principle of freedom of expression.”
Now why would a great “free speech” advocate take a case prosecuting freedom of expression? First, consider that most of Amal Clooney’s cases are family and/or terrorist related as this is who they are. As expected, familial ties are attached to this Armenian case, as well. Harut Sassounian of The California Courier writes:
“Since my last column, several readers have pointed out the little-known family link between Mrs. Clooney (Amal Ramzi Alamuddin) and ‘Papa’ Jakob Kuenzler, a Swiss missionary known as “the father of Armenian orphans.” Kuenzler and his wife had diligently aided the Armenian community in Ourfa for 25 years until the Genocide. Then in the 1920’s, the Kuenzlers began working for Near East Relief, evacuating thousands of Armenian orphans from Turkey to Ghazir, Lebanon, where Armenian girls wove the famous ‘White House rug’ which was donated to U.S. President Calvin Coolidge in 1925. The Kuenzlers’ daughter Ida married Najib Alamuddin, the cousin of Amal’s grandfather, Khalil Alamuddin.”
In addition, one could argue that the Clooney alignment with this “100 Lives” initiative dealing specifically with the Armenian genocide might have accounted for this judgement. However, as a “world famous Muslim ‘human rights’ attorney”, one might also argue that she could have used her huge public platform to defend free speech as it was intended, whether she agreed with it or not, while calling out the radical Islamists partaking in the modern day genocide of the slaughter of Christians worldwide the same as happened in Armenia many years ago. No…none of that fits their narrative. The Clooneys advocate for “controlled speech” and use “Islamophobia” to push these speech restrictions in addition to using the modern day slaughter of Christians worldwide not to call out those facilitating the atrocities but to push for “open borders” of sovereign of nations. They are using the exact platforms they claim to support to undermine the rights of citizens.
Ultimately, the high court ruled against Amal regarding her position on the Armenian Genocide case. She lost. Again. Perhaps that is why, after almost two years of promoting this event as their first joint “humanitarian issues” as husband and wife Amal failed to show. Perhaps it “did what it was supposed to do” in attempting to show her as a Muslim who cared about “her people” slaughtering Christians. Regardless, with this loss, she failed not only their “humanitarian” cover but also failed to present to the winner the scholarship she supposedly established or, at least, to which she had her name attached. George presented it.
No light is being made of the atrocities any of the Armenian people suffered. However, they are not the focus here; the Clooneys are and how they seem to be using the event to justify pushing the globalist agenda of destroying the west, more specifically the U.S. and Israel. Take this “Aurora Prize for Awakening Humanity”, Clooney’s new pet project, defined as “a new global award that will be given annually to people who put themselves at risk to enable others to survive and thrive. Recipients will be recognized for the exceptional impact their actions have made to preserving human life or advancing humanitarian causes, despite the challenges that they have overcome.” As with anything “human rights” related, language is important and usually completely subjective. In order to find out what it means, one must check into the backgrounds of the other three non-Clooney members of the “selection committee” on the initiative’s homepage.
First, there is Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor who witnessed atrocities most of us will hopefully never know; however, he is a liberal democrat. True to Clooney form, on November 6th, 2009 Weisel “blasted the tea party ‘anti-Semitism’ and Holocaust comparisons: ‘This kind of political hatred is indecent and disgusting’.” Who knows to what he was referring as the Tea Party deals with financial issues only. One can only assume, being a liberal academic, he believed the false narrative about the Tea Party crafted by the likes of Clooney to keep in step with the democrat party platform. However, as a Holocaust survivor and activist who sat next to Senator Ted Cruz at a meeting the day before being the guest of honor at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Congressional speech regarding the negative implications of the Iran nuclear deal, one would hope his eyes have been opened to the fact that conservatives are, indeed, his friends and democrats, including Clooney who thinks Iran which announced it would use said nuclear weapons on Israel and the U.S. and whose people shouted “Death to America! Death to Israel!” in the streets as one of the world’s largest sponsors of terrorism should have equal representation on the global stage, are not. Regardless, Wiesel is going to be at this event next year, the first recipient of the award, and is a major player.
Then there is Hina Jilani, listed as “Former UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders”. In 2009, Jilani partook in the UN fact finding mission on the Gaza conflict. Sound familiar? It should. It was the 2009 equivalent of the 2014 Israeli witch hunt position Amal turned down. Israel rejected the seemingly blatant prejudicial outcomes while Hamas embraced them. This “human rights activist” hates Israel. So does Amal. So does Vartan Gregorian, who is listed as “Co-founder, 100 Lives: President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York”. Mr. Gregorian was the first non-native American citizen to become President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. As such, while Mr. Carnegie’s primary aim was to benefit the people of the United States, Mr. Gregorian opened up the wealth flow straight to the hotbed of cronyism in the form of “humanitarianism” to, yes, Africa. Currently “this area of Corporation grant making focuses on selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa.” Mr. Gregorian is top Muslim globalist who works in tandem with Soros to achieve global governance via “climate change” and the “islamofication” of the west through the Common Core curriculum in public schools.
Mr. Gregorian serves on a few boards to help streamline this Muslim influx of America. As with George and Amal, the idea is to smooth over the radical image of those they support—not moderate Muslims but the ones who work actively against the west like the terrorists she defends and supports. Please note, then, that Gregorian is not an assimilated Muslim. According to a book review by the Middle East Forum, his book Islam: A Mosaic, Not a Monolith “establishes the Islamist goal of world domination.” A chapter of the book, “Islamism: Liberation Politics,” quotes Ayatollah Khomeini: “Islam does not conquer. Islam wants all countries to become Muslim, of themselves.” Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, is quoted stating it “is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” Gregorian himself recommends for Muslims a system he calls “theo-democracy,” which he defines as “a divine democratic government” that, according to the book review, “would have a limited popular sovereignty under the suzerainty of Allah.” If Amal is being used to assimilate radical Islam through the masses via pop culture, Mr. Gregorian is doing it via the supposed “islamophobia” brought about by 9/11 and our public education system.
We hear the term Islamophobia used in conjunction with slander. The word was coined sometime ago and has been used frequently since 9/11; however, there have been no significant retaliations against Muslims in the United States since, but the media and Islamic groups acted as if there were. It gave them the perfect opportunity to set up the “refugee” scenario. Mr. Gregorian is very involved in shaping the image of Muslims since the September 11th attacks. WND reported Gregorian is closely tied to the Muslim leaders behind the controversial Islamic cultural center to be built near the site of the Sept. 11 attacks. Gregorian also serves on the board of the Sept. 11 Memorial and Museum. The museum is reportedly working with the American Society for Muslim Advancement, whose leaders are behind the mosque, to ensure the future museum will represent the voices of American Muslims. The Cordoba Initiative, which is behind the proposed mosque to be built about two blocks from the area referred to as Ground Zero, has, with Gregorian at its helm, the Carnegie Corporation at the top of the list of society supporters on the Islamic group’s website.
As for public education, his influence financially and philosophically go much deeper. Mr. Obama’s mentor, domestic Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers received $49.2 million in startup capital for an education-reform project from Vartan Gregorian, a board member of the Qatar Foundation, which, as reported in 2012, has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was started by the former Emir of Qatar and founder of Al Jazeera news network, Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani. Qatar has gained access to America’s K-12 students through other education programs as well. For example, Qatar Foundation International’s “flagship” Arabic Language and Culture program is offered in several US schools and districts. In addition, Gregorian is an integral part of “Connect All Schools”, through which Qatar invested $5 million to teach not just Arabic in American public schools but to clean up radical Islam’s image. For example, at Alice Deal Middle School in Washington, DC, students connected with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Syria for a lesson that examined “how the media in the U.S. stereotypes Muslims in a negative light.” Note the “image cleanup” involves American changing their tune, not Islam doing anything about its radicalism. In an effort to alert these schools to the fact that Qatar is a “pernicious sponsor of Islamic terror,” Col. Allen West, Frank Gaffney, Jr. of the Center for Security Policy, and Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, recently joined with several others to start the Qatar Awareness Campaign. According to the group: “Qatar is arguably the preeminent sponsor of terror in the world today. It is a benefactor of the genocidal armies of ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram; it is involved in Taliban narcotics trafficking through a relationship with the Pakistani National Logistics Cell; and profits from operating a virtual slave state. Qatar has leveraged its relationships with violent jihadi groups to its own benefit, and to the detriment of the United States and her allies.” In addition to the Connect All Schools initiative, Qatar has gained access to America’s K-12 students to push their message. This guy who represents a major sponsor of world terror sponsors several major initiatives of Clooneys. Telling.
In addition, former National Endowment for the Humanities Chairman Jim Leach seemed to use the NEA to “propagandize for the Obama administration’s wishful thinking about Islam”. Leach saw Obama’s much-vaunted Cairo speech as the blueprint for what the NEH should be doing, as he made clear in this fawning address to the Carnegie Corporation, and numerous Endowment initiatives followed, including the Bridging Cultures initiative, and the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf. Scott Johnson of Powerline notes, “Consider the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf that Leach foisted on the Endowment, with the support of a $1.2 million grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Carnegie is an organization run by Vartan Gregorian, under whose leadership Carnegie has become deeply invested in Islam-related initiatives”. Leach thus converted the NEH into a vehicle of propaganda because, upon further review, an NEH source familiar with the project has explained that the grant was awarded by Carnegie to the NEH with the unwritten (but completely understood) provision that there were to be “no books or voices critical of Islam and the dangerous Islamist tendencies within Islam.” When asked about the exclusion, NEH political flack Eva Caldera stated those books were already “widely available.”
This banning of books fits well with how Clooney left supports “free speech” which is it is fine as long as it is speech of which they approve. It is no surprise that Mr. Gregorian was one of the first university Presidents to expel a student for using “hate speech” when expressing his right to “free” speech. A drunken student yelled some nasty names at some other kids. The school deemed them “unsafe” and, as such, the school felt the need to “balance free speech against freedom of fear”. No, that is not how the first amendment was designed to work. It was not designed to protect ears from offensive language. However, as we know from studying the globalist agenda, anything that works to get the first amendment of our Constitution to fall takes precedent. Mr. Gregorian was upset by news reports that suggested the student had been expelled because he violated university regulations governing speech. Gregorian said the rules proscribed behavior, not words, therefore it was fine. He was quite judicial with his language when he stated, “”The day that Brown denies any student freedom of speech is the day that I give up my presidency of the university.” He did not give up his presidency when he should have, then, because he did deny a student’s right to free speech as protected by the first amendment. That is very subjective language and subjective interpretation of that language used to kick that kid out of school. This was in 1991. Look at where we are now. We now live in an era of “safe zones” from “hate speech” on higher education campuses. Gregorian helped censor reading content through the power of the purse where his education grants are concerned, and he also did so when President of Brown University. “Free speech” means “the speech
which he authorizes” in true globalist fashion and now it looks like democrats in the U.S. are serious in using it to curtail our first amendment rights. House Resolution 569 was introduced on December 17, 2015 with “its self-described purpose is ‘condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States’.” Democrats have been trying to ban what they deem hate speech and now plan to exploit Muslims to achieve their goals as an excuse to put in laws that damage or destroy the First Amendment. Where are the “Je Suis Clooneys” now? Railing against supposedly “xenophobic” Trump…by design.
George Clooney’s denouncing of the first amendment while pretending to care about “freedom” is nowhere more blatantly apparent then with the Sony Hack scandal. After the release of the first batch of emails, which showed Clooney as an incredibly insecure individual who worries a great deal about his public persona, he seized on the opportunity to try to re-establish himself as some sort of “leader” and bastion of “free speech”. Again, his actions spoke louder than his words. Clooney’s BFF Obama quickly blamed North Korea for the attack, leading him to renew his push for net neutrality which will, in essence, give the federal government control over the internet. Clooney has said nothing regarding Obama’s Wag the Dog proxy war with North Korea to do this. Instead, Clooney claimed to have drafted a petition to release “The Interview” that he supposedly circulated to the studio heads to have them sign as a show of solidarity for the first amendment; however, no one signed it. Turns out, there probably was not one. Many of the studio heads said they never saw it, but if they did, they say they would have signed it. Clooney claims they are full of it, but when asked to name names, he declined. His “petition” was used to save face with the American people that he cares about their values while remaining silent on Obama’s net neutrality push as his silence lends him credibility with the global elites. Clooney is fine with selling us out to communist North Korea if it means solidifying his global elite status. He will sell us out to anything to make that happen, including Muslim extremism.
The last point regarding Gregorian’s Islamafication “contribution” to education involves Pearson Education which designs “education products and services to institutions, governments and direct to individual learners”. This company has the biggest contracts with the Gates Foundation to provide textbooks for the Common Core curriculum and its contents. Since the Common Core curriculum was designed by 12 politicians and special interests, not local school boards, parents, educators, and education specialists, Pearson is the perfect fit for this crony contract to push Islam, and it does as a pillar of the Common Core Social Studies Standards. In addition, Pearson is listed on the London and New York Stock Exchange with the Libyan Investment Authority as its largest financial contributor, holding 26 million shares. According to the Financial Times, the Libyan Investment Authority was founded by Muammar Gaddafi’s son, Seif al-Islam and more than five Gaddafi family members own shares. The Council on Islamic Relations (CAIR), Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the Muslim Brotherhood are invested in Pearson Education through the Libyan Investment Authority. Oh…that son of Gaddafi? Amal is his lawyer. Yes…he has a vested interest in the future of America’s children.
It has also emerged that Vartan Gregorian served on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded the “Responsibility to Protect” act. With Gregorian on the advisory board & Soros a primary financial backer, the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty first defined the Responsibility to Protect, or Responsibility to Act, as cited by Obama, as a “set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege but a responsibility that can be revoked if a country is accused of ‘war crimes’” ‘genocide’. ‘crimes against humanity’ or ‘ethnic cleansing’.” The problem is the completely subjective nature of these terms could prove even more problematic. As WND reported, “The term ‘war crimes’ has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, which applied it to Israeli anti-terror operations in the Gaza Strip. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops.” Yes, the “Responsibility to Protect” means that this global governing body can declare the sovereignty of a nation null and invade where they see fit if what they can deem what they see happening as “genocide” or “crimes against humanity”, including Israel and the U.S. Why not? Language. They are fabulous with it…and are using it every way they can to undermine US and Israeli sovereignty. In fact, there is talk of the UN interfering in the democrat enabled water crisis in Flint, MI. These are the people with whom the Clooneys associate.
Another area that ties to the destruction of national sovereignties where Soros and Gregorian are concerned? Illegal immigration, amnesty, “Syrian refugees”, the “migrant crisis”-whatever term works-…just understand that as the borders are erased, these two are flooding the areas with Muslims as “refugees”. As Soros admitted he is behind the “migrant crisis” after being called out by the President of Hungary and the Czech Republic, so, too, is Gregorian, a pro-open borders advocate. In fact, the article ” Rich Immigrants are Behind $18 Million to Force Passage of Amnesty for Illegal Aliens this Year” establishes Soros and Vartan as the two primary backers of amnesty. We already know of Soros and his plan, but this one goes farther to establish that, “Another foundation committing millions to the pro-amnesty effort is the Carnegie Corporation which has made rewards for illegal immigration one of its top projects. Carnegie openly touts its decision to be a central organizing leader to pull foundations together in a consortium to ensure amnesty and increased future immigration. The open-borders leadership was begun at Carnegie under its new president, Vartan Gregorian.” This is not conjecture. It is happening in real time all around the world. It is probably why the two greatest “humanitarians” of all time have said nothing about the “genocide” of Christians worldwide by radical Muslim extremists worldwide. Those paying their bills are helping to relocate these “refugees” globally. The Clooneys have, however, ramped up the security around their English estate including a fence and closed circuit television and had special “paparazzi” laws made for them in Italy.
Why the push, then, by the anti-Israel, pro-Hamas Clooneys to help force Islamic Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide of 1.5 million Christians? First, reparations. There would be a call for a redistribution of Turkey’s modern day wealth to another nation based on events from 100 years ago. If this precedent is set, one might argue it bodes well for Obama’s call for reparations for slavery in the U.S. meaning today’s generation of children will be responsible for paying off some ridiculously imposed financial debt, with a price imposed by a bunch of politicians, due to some dark stain on history hundreds of years ago. It is a ludicrous notion, but wealth distribution from the world to the global elites is a key component of their control. In addition, if the genocide is recognized by Turkey then so must Israel recognize it. According to Steven Michael Jacobs in his book Modern Genocide: The Definitive Resource and Document Collection, “There is a deeper problem. Part of the conflict that Israel finds itself in results from the Israeli abuses of Palestinian human rights from 1948 on. Rather than addressing its own violations as a means of promoting peace within occupied areas and with neighboring countries, Israel continues to pursue the same polices. This leaves it in the position of having to make cynical foreign policy deals, such as the alliance with Turkey to harm Armenians.” The argument here is that if Turkey is forced to recognize the genocide, the logic is so, then, too must Israel This might then force Israel to admit to whatever “war crimes” violations they supposedly committed against Palestinians in the eyes of the UN all of these years which leaves them even more vulnerable to a U.N. “intervention” via the “Responsibility to Protect” or “Restrain the Veto”. Who turned down a position on a panel to investigate these supposed “war crimes” i.e. “human rights violations” against Israel? Amal. Who was on a panel that did in 2009? Hina Jilani of Mr. Clooney’s “100 Lives Initiative”. Israel better watch themselves or the “Responsibility to Protect” might be used against them.
Another reason? Turkey is a NATO ally. Turkey is also supposedly “helping” in the “fight” against ISIS, even though Turkey is a hotbed for terrorism. Overall, Obama, who promised when he hit the campaign trail for re-election…remember that $15 million fundraiser at George’s house?…changed his mind when it came time to remember the atrocity on its 100th year anniversary. Mr. Obama “has not only failed to recognize the Armenian Genocide, but has actively blocked congressional legislation (H.Res.252, 111th Congress) to commemorate this atrocity and, through his Solicitor General, officially opposed efforts in the U.S. courts … to allow American citizens to pursue Genocide-era property claims”. Maybe this would explain why the greatest “human rights humans against genocide who have ever lived” and even had this “100 Lives” foundation set up as a remembrance of this event skipped the festivities? Not a peep out of either one of them. There was noting politically or financially to gain. That windfall comes in 2016. Now the Kardashians? They were on hand in Armenia to pay their respects. Telling.
Before we get to the breakdown of the “100 Lives” foundation “mission” statement, let’s understand what has happened so far with regards to education where George Clooney is concerned…it has been usurped to undermine American exceptionalism, especially with regards to freedom of speech, while pushing Islam in the Common Core curriculum. As a noted Hillary Clinton supporter, it’s worth noting that the DNC leaks revealed the Clinton “pay to play” schemes where “former President Bill Clinton collected $5.6 million in fees from an entity dubbed GEMS Education, and that he was also named its ‘honorary chairman’ from 2011 to 2014. Based in Dubai, GEMS is the world’s leading Sharia Law education center with a network of more than 100 schools across the Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The company also seems to have contributed millions of dollars more to the Clinton Foundation itself. Daily Caller reports that Bill and Hillary’s joint tax returns “corroborate the former president’s role with GEMS.” Counter-terrorism analyst and former intelligence officer Stephen Coughlin said of the Clinton’s relationship with GEMS, “Why would Bill Clinton be participating in programs that teach Sharia in foreign countries where that is the specific objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS and al-Qaeda?” Indeed. Then again, Bill was “honorary chairman” of an international Sharia Law education center during the same time the Islamafication of public education via the Common Core curriculum in the United States was starting under Clooney co-horts Hillary, Obama and Vartan Gregorian. Seems like a “global indoctrination” via “the children”, no?
That said, watch the metamorphosis of the “100 Lives” initiative from one that focuses on the Armenian Genocide to using it as a cover for their globalist agendas. On March 11th, 2015, Armenian Weekly stated:
“On March 10, the ‘100 LIVES’ initiative, which aims to celebrate survivors of the Armenian Genocide and support efforts to keep the legacy of gratitude alive, was launched in New York. The initiative is led by a group of Diasporan Armenians including President of Carnegie Corporation Vartan Gregorian and entrepreneurs Ruben Vardanyan and Noubar Afeyan. The project aims to uncover and recount stories about survivors and their saviors, which will be collected through academic research, personal accounts, and story submissions by the public to the 100lives.com website.”
This article says nothing about education or refugees. It reads as if it will benefit either the descendants of those who perished or their memories somehow. Fine. It does not turn out that way. As for the “group of Armenians”, we have already seen for what they stand and their ties to Clooney some as far back as 2011. Makes sense, then ,that by 2016, the “100 Lives” had morphed into the “how to use a manufactured-by-the-UN ‘humanitarian’ crisis in Syria to destroy sovereign nations around the world for UN control”.
Consider the panels that were held at the “Autora Dialogues”.
First? “The Global State of the Humanitarian Issue”. Former United Nations special representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders and Aurora Prize Selection Committee Member Hina Jilani believes that despite the skepticism that exists toward the United Nations today, its authority and mandate must be reinforced. “Countries that are members of the UN sometimes try to compete with the UN and weaken it, and I think that is a mistake. We need a central authority that has sense and that no particular country dominates”. “Central authority”? Global governance. Right.
Second panel? “Saving the World’s Refugees, Syria and Beyond” keynoted by Aurora Prize Selection Committee Member and brainchild behind the “Responsibility to Protect” Gareth Evans. The distinguished panel discussed “the root causes of forced migration, assess what can be learnt from history, and discuss the ways in which the humanitarian community can work in collaboration with institutions to address these issues”. Moderating the panel was Gillian Sorensen, board member of the International Rescue Committee and senior advisor at the United Nations Foundation. As an American, Sorensen noted that all Americans “were refugees at one point.” NO. We were NOT all “refugees at one point”. I have NEVER been a refugee. Nor were my parents. Nor were my grandparents I am a CITIZEN of a SOVEREIGN nation but a descendant of immigrants. I am not nor have I ever been a “refugee”. This is completely false and misleading rhetoric.
Panel 3 is quite surprising as, to liberals, gender is a social construct but nevertheless is was titled, “The Role of Women in the International Humanitarian Community”. Other than to complain about “equality” instead of working to fix the problem as they think it exists without the help of “legislating” it as the globalists see fit, there was not really a whole lot to see. The last panel, “Shining a Light on the Crisis”, is the most notable one as it deals with, in lines with the DNC leaks revelations, the role the media plays “in covering humanitarian crises and shaping the public’s opinion about them. The discussion was moderated by Ted Koppel, a prominent U.S. journalist and a senior contributor the CBS Sunday Morning News. Much of the discussion centered on the evolving media landscape and the role that social media plays in the way humanitarian crises around the world get reported. In a world where traditional media’s authority is waning, it is becoming more difficult to aggregate the various points of view and create an objective, verifiable reality. According to Koppel, journalists used to be the “gatekeepers” through which all information had to pass, but unfiltered information spreading through social media without anyone verifying the facts poses real danger.” Translated this means that the “real” news can get through to the people directly without the big conglomerate media spin as dictated by entities such as the DNC. If it were not for the internet and this sort of “journalism”, people would be completely sold on George and Amal Clooney as a UN Supercouple and the Crony Clinton Killing Machine would never have come to light. The “100 Lives” initiative has morphed from a charity to commemorate the Armenian Genocide into a UN propaganda machine.
Chapter 20: The Clooney’s Education Initiatives
Now we know about Clooney and the “100 Lives” co-founders agendas, consider let’s look at the two “education” projects with which the Clooneys are involved. The United World College in Dilijan , Armenia is Vardanyan’s baby. This is the school where the Amal Clooney Scholarship is applicable towards a “two year international baccalaureate program”. This school opened in 2013, coincidentally the same year Amal supposedly entered George’s life. This 2 year program costs about $70,000. Why? If the Clooneys are so concerned about “education” for the “disadvantaged”, why attach their names to a school only the 1% can afford? Supposedly “The average fee paid by students at UWC Dilijan is less than 10% of the full fee, and many students pay nothing at all. The scholarships come from donations from the college’s supporters who believe in the vision of our Founders and the UWC mission and wish to create a world-class centre of educational excellence in the region.” There is no confirmation that Amal’s scholarship covers that whole amount or from where the money comes. The Clooneys never pay for anything out of pocket. They fundraise and/or demand the UN tax “rich” nations to pay for their ‘humanitarian” work as part of a forcible wealth redistribution scheme. So what gives?
This very well might tie to their globalization goals through education as with the common core curriculum. Take this United World College, which has quite the UN sounding title. Checking the “mission” statement, many of the UN approved terms used are also Common Core aligned: “Sustainability”, “compassion”, “respect for the environment”, “idealism”, “diversity”, “peace”, “justice”…”social indoctrination”. All of these terms are, of course, keywords to the UN 2020 Agenda. There is nothing in the mission statement or on the “values” page about academics. The site continues, “That baccalaureate program again takes a holistic approach to educate the young mind not only in the curriculum, but tend to their emotional needs as well as inculcate a sense of internationalism in them”. Emotional needs? “Internationalism”? There is a difference between identifying as a citizen of a sovereign nation who part takes in a global economy. It is not the same as being a ‘global citizen” ruled by a global governing body. Pushing this globalist agenda has made George very, very rich as well as his 1% handlers by forcibly redistributing the “wealth” of the 99% in the west to themselves via the UN while doing pretty much close to nothing for the environment or the “human rights” missions they claims to support. This “education” initiative in Armenia is just one more way to indoctrinate the UN agenda into children thousands of miles away from their families…because it takes a (UN) village with the parental role secondary. In addition, there is the UWC school and then the “movement”. The “movement’s” mission is to “make education a force to unite people, nations and cultures for peace and a sustainable future”. Hmm..sounds ripe for a GEMS type situation. Only time will tell as the first class did not start until August of 2014, the month before the wedding.
The other education initiative that the Clooneys, along with Selma Hayek and Richard Gere claim to be involved with is Scholas Occurrentes, the initiative with Pope Francis that started on August 14, 2013. Interesting that anti-open borders Pope Benedict “retired” in 2013, the first pope to step down in 600 years, paving the way for pro-open borders Francis in 2013, the same year George “met’ Amal. The same year the Armenian school opened. Anyway, its mission is listed “To link schools and educative networks around the world by means of different types of pedagogical, sports and artistic proposals aimed at improving education and achieving inclusion of communities with fewer resources through an active commitment of all social stakeholders. The VISION of Scholas Occurrentes is ‘to transform the world into an inclusive and educative society’.” Sounds a whole lot like the Armenian initiative, no? The website states, “We want to have 30% of the world’s population participating in this new concept of open-sided education, through the technological, sports and artistic revolution proposed by Scholas.” Open sided education from an open borders pope working with open borders education at facilities with open border entertainment supporters as the face. One might argue that at least the Pope put his “money where his mouth is” when he agreed to take a few Syrian refugee families back to the Vatican from Lesbos. The reality was shattered, though, when he left a Syrian Christian brother and sister duo behind in lieu of all Syrian Muslims. “Important values”.
Lorena Bianchetti, one of the organizers of the event, said that “Important values can be transmitted by celebrities”, adding that the actors had agreed to be ambassadors for one of the foundation’s arts projects. However, it was not clear from initial reports what the celebrities in attendance had actually done to merit the positions but, as the Soros leaks prove that he has tried and continues to attempt to hijack the Catholic Church for his progressive agenda, it is not so shocking that the atheist from a Catholic family and his Israeli hating Muslim bride who do his bidding every other time were chosen for this event. Explains the other “stars” involved, too, as they have close Clooney ties: Selma Hayek was George’s co-star in “From Dusk to Dawn” and Richard Gere is the ex-husband of Clooney’s best friend’s wife, Cindy Crawford, who has been married to Casamigos co-
owner and Clooney best bud Rande Gerber for almost 20 years. . These three attended a meeting at the Vatican to receive the “Olive Medal” for peace at a Vatican event. Peace? Obviously the pope was not aware of Clooney’s long history of warmongering for financial gain. Anyway, they broke bread to, at least for the pope, promote Scholas Occurrentes, an “arts organization founded by Pope Francis that aims to bring together children from different backgrounds, with the hope of achieving peace and understanding”. Children? Since when is George Clooney an advocate for children? Since when he could use “the children” to command this very public platform to not only attempt to reinforce their fake “humanitarian” profiles but to push the open borders agenda while taking a seemingly veiled swipe at Donald Trump when he praised the “wonderful program” that enables “many different religions to speak of inclusion, because we know that hatred and fundamentalist attitudes are learned and inculcated” even though the Pope left the Syrian Christians behind. Leave it to Clooney to politicize a meeting with the Pope. Time will tell if this falls the way of other “education” initiatives of the elites…promise everything, deliver nothing, and pocket a whole lot of cash much like Bill Clinton and GEMS Education.
The DNC leaks revealed in the Clinton “pay to play” schemes that “former President Bill Clinton collected $5.6 million in fees from an entity dubbed GEMS Education, and that he was also named its “honorary chairman” from 2011 to 2014. Based in Dubai, GEMS is the world’s leading Sharia Laweducation center with a network of more than 100 schools across the Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The company also seems to have contributed millions of dollars more to the Clinton Foundation itself. Daily Caller reports that Bill and Hillary’s joint tax returns “corroborate the former president’s role with GEMS.” Counter-terrorism analyst and former intelligence officer Stephen Coughlin said of the Clinton’s relationship with GEMS, “Why would Bill Clinton be participating in programs that teach Sharia in foreign countries where that is the specific objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS and al-Qaeda?” Indeed. Then again, Bill was “honorary chairman” of an international Sharia Law education center during the same time the Islamafication of public education via the Common Core curriculum in the United States was taking place under Clooney co-horts Hillary, Obama and Vartan Gregorian. These are the same types of questions asked when Clooney suddenly decided to get married because he met “the (Muslim) one”. 2014, the year Bill ended his “honorary chair” position, is the year of the great Clooney wedding.
The Clooneys “pro education” smokescreen is already starting to show cracks. In June of 2016, Amal Clooney, she of an extreme life of privilege who never worked a real job in her life and who uses her current position to force her views on the world, hit up entrepreneurs in Monaco as a KEYNOTE SPEAKER at a conference to beg the private sector for money for two “education” initiatives she and her husband are setting up with the UN, of course, for Syrian “refugee” children. What these initiatives specifically entail is not known as of yet because “the educational side of this program has not been initiated because of lack of funds.” The woman got how big of an hourly raise for getting married and her husband is worth how much? They can’t start it up themselves? In fact, have they put any cash up themselves? Probably not. The Clooneys are socialists. They hate free market capitalism. Only the crony capitalism that benefits the 1% via socialism to keep them rich is acceptable so this is quite a new development…begging capitalists for money. Then again, as they plan on partnering with the UN, no doubt people like you and me will be forced to fund “education” for “Syrian refugee children”. But is it really for “Syrian refugee children”? Of course not. Amal says, “the way the private sector can help is that, for instance, we could be designing a software programme that allows these
observers to input information in a more uniform manner, so that we can ultimately compare one trial to another and eventually get something like a justice index, where you can compare one court to another. And [that would mean] governments could no longer hide behind the courts to the extent that they do at the moment.” A justice index? Who determines the rational for this “justice index”? The UN? Her? What does that have to do with academically educating children? Nothing. It might go to the $70K/year school in Armenia using Amal’s subjective “justice index” to indoctrinate the kids into what is “fair”..what are “important values”….and what are “not” for “global citizens”. George was not on hand to shill for their great upcoming UN Superpower Couple education endeavor…but her mommy was, and her blog was quick to inform us that this crusader for the downtrodden who hits up everyone else for money wore a GIAMBATTISTA VALL Floral-Cloqué Dress that cost a mere $2,650.
Chapter 21: Clooney “Democracy” Takes a Hit
2016 was to be the relaunch of the Clooneys as “humanitarians” in their push to derail the worldwide collapse of their 1% politics. The opposite happened. See, Clooney famously stated in 2013 after Obama’s re-election about Obamacare, “People keep talking about how this has to be a great negotiation, but there isn’t any negotiating a law. We negotiate on all these other topics, but this was put into law, and [Obama] was reelected on it. It was reaffirmed, it was passed through the Supreme Court — it’s a law. You don’t like it? Win an election. That’s how it works. That’s how the country works. But you don’t get to shut down the government because of it. That’s not how it works.” There is no negotiating a
law? Oh, my. Maybe not in tyrannical globalist 1% politics but there surely is in a constitutional republic. Then again, the 1% are not affected by Obamacare in any capacity as they have the time and money to get the care they deem best whenever and wherever they want, even if it means creating a huge carbon footprint as he did just before his wedding in September of 2014 when he took a private jet to Germany to see a private physician about back problems. So his snarky advice was to win an election? People took it. Win an election the opposition did—many of them. The politics that Clooney has shoved down our throats (but from which he himself is exempt) were resoundingly defeated in the midterm elections of 2014 in the United States. Not only was there a historic “sweep” with democrats losing local and state races across the country, but the GOP also elected women, minorities, and much younger candidates in, as The Huffington Post said, “a legislative body that has historically been dominated by older, white men”. The primary reasons for this “sweep” involved opposition to Obamacare, the Islamic State insurgency, the border crisis—basically the economy which has rapidly declined under Obama and national security which is non-existent in a “global citizen” world. The icing on the proverbial cake that tempered Clooney’s hubris was when in November of 2014 his homestate of Kentucky “lost four of the five statewide constitutional offices they held coming into the election, including the governor’s office for just the second time since 1971”. That governor, Matt Bevin, is a Tea Party candidate—the same Tea Party that sat in solidarity
with Elie Weisel during Netanyahu’s speech against a nuclear Iran. Clooney’s politics have been rejected soundly nationally and not just by “gun clinging Bible thumpers” but by American citizens who see what is happening to our country. It is no longer Democrat versus Republican. It is citizens versus globalists. By now, we know on which side Clooney resides.
The trouncing of his politics is not just domestic, though. It is worldwide, especially regarding the Soros orchestrated “migrant crisis”. In Austria, the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) has stepped in against the tide of “refugees”. Denmark’s Danish People’s Party (DF) has been so successful that it now has the balance of power and has threatened to topple the government if it attempts to soften its stance on immigration. The Finns Party (PS) in Finland is essentially left-wing with its economic policies but is allied to a hardline stance on immigration. In France, the Front National (FN) party stunned Europe with its rise to power which came about due to its concerns about high immigration and home grown extremism. Germany. Greece. Hungary (already noted as their Prime Minister called out Soros for orchestrating this “migrant crisis”). Clooney’s favorite spot on the planet, Italy, has seen the far right Northern League party make real strides against the socialist government due to the “migrant crisis” with a landslide 50% of the vote in regions of Veneto and Lombardy. It also got 20% of the electorate in Tuscany, the left-wing heartland of the Democratic Party. The Netherlands. Sweden is on the verge of collapse. Switzerland. Keep in mind Europe has watched these “refugees” erase their borders for many years now, long before they started erasing the U.S. border. They know that the majority of those coming are not “women and children” but young, healthy men and only about half are from Syria. Most claim they are not fleeing because of war but for the “benefits” the west has to offer, which is why they land in welfare states.
There is a reason why none of the rich Arab nations in the Middle East such as Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain are taking these “war refugees”. They have denied them entry mostly due to fears of terrorism. Clooney’s buddies do not want them and as Clooney’s beloved migrants arrive in his cherished Lake Como, it seems neither he, Amal, nor the other 1% residents want them:
“The new pictures of migrants taking over Como’s main train station come a week after residents expressed concerns over the growing numbers of migrants camping as they wait to slip over the nearby border into Switzerland.
Swiss authorities have placed an effective shut down on their border to asylum seekers, meaning women, men and children have been forced to camp out in the glitzy Italian town.”
Before June, migrants were able to board a train in Como to cross the border into Switzerland where they would claim refuge or carry on to Germany.
However, as Swiss politicians fear an influx of migrants similar to Germany last year, they have cracked down on border entries.”
Nowhere is George seen telling Lake Como residents that they’re not “doing enough”. In fact, “The Swiss Government announced plans yesterday to increase the speed of processing asylum seekers after two-thirds of the Swiss electorate voted for the plan in a recent referendum.” It pays to be rich and know the problems they create can go away with a couple of greased palms. Clooney does have special “privacy” laws written for himself and the Mrs. in Italy, and they have a gate and CCTV installed around their British mansion, so their biggest risk is probably a decrease in property values. The rest of the world, however, is supposed to drop their borders, share their wealth, and allow the Muslim invasion to occur as a “humanitarian” effort or risk being called a “xenophobe”.
June of 2016 proved the biggest hit in the Clooney/Soros globalization push. First off, Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty was before the Supreme Court and, with Justice Scalia dead and the likes of UN backed justices like Sotomayor and Kagan on the bench, the possibility for a “win” seemed better than ever, even though per the Constitution, it should have been a 8-0 decision. The decision came to a 4-4 split, thus effectively ending Obama’s amnesty for 11 million illegals as well as his halting of deportations and non-enforcement of our immigration laws. This came as a shock to the Soros crew as the Soros leaks revealed that they had banked on a victory. Soros had, after all, applied pressure to “secure a desired outcome in a U.S. Supreme Court case on illegal immigration enforcement” while Obama had the language “expanded” to include mass influx from Central America. Have no fear, the Department of “Justice” is “reviewing” the decision. Why? SCOTUS is the “law”, right? Obamacare? Gay Marriage? Only when it suits the agenda. A Clooney/Soros “Democratic” SCOTUS victory would have completely eliminated our borders while automatically legalizing ELEVEN MILLION UNVETTED illegals, key for November, and paved the way for the North American Union, much like the European Union which had its own death knell this week.
Then, in a historical referendum, and to the dismay and amazement of the globalists who have run rampant over the laws of sovereign nations the last 20 years or so, the people of Britain voted to leave the EU. This “democracy in action”, much like, say, the South Sudan vote in 2012, could conceivably cause the collapsed of the vaunted European Union. This has caused globalists like George Sorosto have public meltdowns of epic proportions. The EU was the model “superstate” for the few “superstates” the globalists have worked on fusing together for most of the last 40 years. Makes ruling easier as a few large bodies instead of many small ones. As of now, nine other countries have called for similar types of referendums, forcing the elites of the EU to publicly reveal their long held plan of eliminating sovereign nations to create one superstate. The “open borders society” these globalists have pursued “politically” for decades took a huge hit twice in the same day last week, and not a word from Mr. Democracy.
It does seem that the PR spin was ready for the UN Supercouple to take the reigns with the expected victories in both cases, though, as an obviously staged pap event occurred in Italy the night before these two decisions, presenting the Clooneys as all “loved up and on vacation” at a “romantic dinner”…with about 30 other people. However, it was not
reported publicly until after both votes and with little fanfare. Was there a whole story written about the “success of Obama’s amnesty at SCOTUS” combined with the “People of Britain having spoken in support of open borders” to portray the Clooneys as some sort of advocates for “humanitarian globalism” planned to coincide with their smiling faces of celebration as the pics were held off until the day AFTER the referendums? Instead, this story went into seemingly limited release, focused heavily on her outfit (of course) and mentioned the papal visit again. One would think that “Mr. Democracy” would be staging press conferences chastising those evil 1% globalists calling for a Brexit do-over as a champion of the “little guy”. Of course not. This is a guy who said the people of California got Prop 8 wrong…twice…and then celebrated when five unelected justices overturned the votes of tens of millions of people to fit the Soros gay agenda. He did the same when SCOTUS rewrote Obamacare from the bench (which is illegal) forcing us all into that. Besides, the leader of the “re-vote” brigade is none other than Mr. Khan, who appeared with Amal’s buddy Prime Minister David Cameron at a “Vote Leave” rally, and Mr. Soros. George would never think of selling out his top sugar daddy. In the meantime, the 1% puppets in the media, as orchestrated, threw cries of “xenophobia” and “racist” at those who voted to leave….
The Clooneys are not concerned with the human rights violations in these mostly Sharia run countries because their goal is to import it to the Western world. There are 88 Sharia courts in Amal’s base country of England, and it has started to infiltrate the U.S. They accomplish this by silencing dissenters of open borders with cries of “islamophobia”, “racism” and “xenophobia”. This is why , on Monday, December 28th, 2015, the Clooneys’ employer, George Soros , publically called on voters to “resist the siren song of the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz” in an op-ed for The Guardian entitled “The Terrorists and Demagogues Want Us to be Scared. We Mustn’t Give In”. From there, as expected, he went on to condemn the non-existent “Islamophobia” of the likes of Cruz and Trump and says we must “reaffirm our commitment to the principles of an open society”. George and Amal then used their public platforms not to condemn terrorism or the genocide of Christians by Muslim extremists worldwide but to use it to label the “right wing extremists”, who, at this rate, are anyone in the world who do not agree with their globalists politics, and their “xenophobia” the real problem in order to push the “open borders” “open society” agenda.
In between the Hail Caesar flop and the Cannes premiere of the Lara Alameddine co-produced Money Monster, George took the cue from his handler to whine about Trump’s supposed “xenophobia” in interviews, claiming that is not who “we” are before getting on board with the #imwithher Hillary Clinton campaign. Keep in mind that the current state of the Middle East, including the “refugee crisis” which exploded in just the past few years, was set up under Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Keep in mind that the
current Libyan debacle is the cornerstone of Hillary’s foreign policy. Remember she blamed a YouTube video for the Benghazi attack and let an innocent film director sit in prison to take the fall. Talk about a free speech violation. And, of course, there is the War on Women that is Bill Clinton. This is who the Clooneys support. They helped Clinton raise over $15 million dollars for her campaign via two fundraisers, one in San Francisco hosted by an Iranian Muslim, Shervin Pishevar, and one at their house in Los Angeles where they charged $343K/couple. Immediately public backlash commenced over the
amounts being thrown around by these 1%ers who pretend to be for the “little guy” while vilifying “big money in politics”. George said he would not have to host such events if Citizens United was overturned by the Supreme Court. No, Clooney is not woefully misinformed. Neither is Mrs. Clinton. They know Citizens United was one case, not a law; however, he and Hillary stump for votes on this issue because if they get their way and eventually this ruling is “overturned”, it erodes more of the first amendment which we have already seen the Clooneys try to undermine from “ethically mined diamonds” in the Congo to “Islamophobia” in the west to the gay agenda in the U.S. forcing religious institutions to violate their beliefs under the guise of “tolerance” and “equality”. The Clooneys hate our first amendment.
As such, Amal, too, turned her attention to Donald Trump, purposefully misquoting him while having the audacity to claim she understood “American values”. Amal Clooney would recognize an American value if it bit her.
Rick Wells of Constitution Rising states:
“She said, ‘If you actually look at what [Trump] specifically says in that now infamous speech about Muslims, he kept saying, ‘They only want jihad; they don’t believe in our way of life; they don’t respect our system…And when he says ‘they’… And, you know, you watch the media coverage afterwards and people should’ve been saying, ‘Do you mean the 1.5 billion people around the world who fit that description? Do you mean the people who are U.S. citizens, who are members of your military, the vast majority of whom are not extremist or violent in any way?’”
Actually he was describing foreigners coming into America, as you well know, Mrs. CAIR mouthpiece, not citizens and not military members, although Nidal Hasan made the point that they should be scrutinized. And most of those 1.5 billion people aren’t coming into the United States; for the small percentage who are, yes – he means them.
She didn’t feel compelled to ask if he meant the terrorists that blew up the airport in Brussels or killed 130 innocent people in Paris or 14 in San Bernardino or the service men in Chattanooga. She didn’t mention the argumentative, non-assimilating and threatening foreigners that we all have the unpleasant occasion to deal with, who demand that we cater to their wishes, including a separate legal and banking system, prayer times during the work day and other accommodations. She should be familiar with the ones who demand special considerations under the threat of legal action.
She also doesn’t bother to ask about the forced importation against our will of uncivilized foreigners and others who might be civilized but whose cultures are incompatible with our Constitution and therefore with the basic most premise for immigration.”
Of course she does not mention any of this. It does not fit the narrative. She and her husband have both claimed, falsely but true to their narrative, that Trump’s comments are “islamophobic” and “xenophobic”. Interesting, then, that Democrats currently have a bill before Congress to criminalize any negative speech regarding Islam. If passed, Trump could be charged with the same type of crime as the gentleman Amal represented in Armenia. She does not support “free speech”. She supports “controlled speech”.
One aspect of “democracy” the DNC leaks helped prove no longer exists is that of an impartial media. Press talking points from May 5th state Hillary is their candidate. CNN is, indeed, the “Clinton News Network as the DNC fed CNN the questions they wanted to be asked in interviews. POLITICO’s Ken Vogel emailed his stories to the DNC before publishing them. The DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories and
discussing their relationship with NBC, MSNBC, CNN & how to get better treatment. Back when Amal did her propaganda press tour with NBC for her great “human rights” work with former President of the Maldives Mohammed Nasheed, many wondered not only how or why this case garnered such attention in the US but why, when she got to Britain, she had her own NBC videographer/photographer who she called out by name walking out of the airport with her? Now we know why. NBC is a propaganda network for the Clinton machine and the DNC. In the DNC leaks, Chuck Todd specifically comes up, at one point asking for “clearance” to comment on an “approved” talking point. Later Julian Assange called Todd out for his “Sloppy journalism”. Not so shocking now that both George and Amal appeared with him to push their falsified talking points and to push their hate
for Trump, the first amendment, and, well, democracy. They have been trolling the world with their “control the narrative” talking points (at least Amal and her mother, “journalist” Baria Alamuddin have over in the Middle East). It was during her Nasheed propaganda press junkets that Amal declared “Democracy is dead”. The Clooneys helped kill it.
Then there is the proof that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders to benefit Hillary, including using his religion against him. Remember when George alluded support for Bernie? Did he mean it? Maybe. Perhaps he’d signed his life away to George Soros long ago in exchange for supporting this woman later as I have long deduced. Then again, he more than likely knew the system was rigged and she would win. The greatest humanitarian supercouple on the planet cannot support a loser, can they? Of course not. Between Soros funds greasing the palms of Obama appointed judges to have common sense voter ID laws overturned in GOP states, busing in “refugees” illegally throughout the states where Voter ID laws have been overturned, the voter fraud already on the record to confirming its existence, and Hollywood and the media so far in the tank for her as the DNC leaks prove, she really cannot lose. It wouldn’t matter who her opponent is. Democracy is dead? Seems that way…and the Clooneys have led the charge.
This is why the relationship between Amal, Assange, Hillary, and Eric Schmidt of Google is so interesting. She was Assange’s lawyer, now she backs Hillary as Assange attempts to bring Hillary down as Amal is super cozy White House helper Eric Schmidt. Something must have happened when Clooney entered the picture because Assange’s tone soured quite a bit. Just shy of one month before the great nuptials, Julian Assange released a book
entitled “Google is Not What It Seems”. In it, he details the “special relationship” between Google, Hillary Clinton, and the State Department, much of which ties to all that we are finding out now. In this extract, he focuses mostly on the relationship between Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen. It ends with his critique of the Schmidt/Cohen book released in April of 2013 titled “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations, and Businesses”. By the time it came out, Assange:
“had formally sought and received political asylum from the government of Ecuador, and taken refuge in its embassy in London. At that point I had already spent nearly a year in the embassy under police surveillance, blocked from safe passage out of the UK. Online I noticed the press hum excitedly about Schmidt and Cohen’s book, giddily ignoring the explicit digital imperialism of the title and the conspicuous string of pre-publication endorsements from famous warmongers like Tony Blair, Henry Kissinger, Bill Hayden and Madeleine Albright on the back. Billed as a visionary forecast of global technological change, the book failed to deliver—failed even to imagine a future, good or bad, substantially different to the present. The book was a simplistic fusion of Fukuyama “end of history” ideology—out of vogue since the 1990s—and faster mobile phones. It was padded out with DC shibboleths, State Department orthodoxies, and fawning grabs from Henry Kissinger. The scholarship was poor—even degenerate. It did not seem to fit the profile of Schmidt, that sharp, quiet man in my living room. But reading on I began to see that the book was not a serious attempt at future history. It was a love song from Google to official Washington. Google, a burgeoning digital superstate, was offering to be Washington’s geopolitical visionary.”
Her husband continued this narrative during the Money Monster press tour, starting on the red carpet in Cannes, especially with the recent election of the first Muslim as mayor of London. Sadiq Khan is an open borders supporter who refers to himself as the “Muslim
George Clooney”. He, too, has already jumped on the “Trump is xenophobic” bandwagon; however, his true colors are showing much more quickly. Just a few days prior to the election, he referred to moderate Muslims as “Uncle Toms” and the day after getting
elected, he threatened Trump to “let in Muslims, or they will attack America”. Kahn has a long history of association with radical Muslims, but, like Amal, he claims it was only because of his “human rights” job. He has since declared that he is going to set up “online hate crime hubs” in “partnership” with social media firms. Who decides what “crimes” or “language” is subjective? His handlers.
It is worth noting, then, that Soros’s “Enough Project” was holding in London the same time the Clooneys were in Cannes, a “Global Anti-Corruption Summit Could Be ‘Game-Changing’ for Africa” which, as discussed, probably has nothing to do with Africa and everything to do with agenda pushing. The point of said summit is to address “corruption” but not the Clinton Foundation, Soros’s “dark money” funneled through CAP, nor the money Amal’s Uncle Ziad has hidden offshore as noted in the Panama Papers. This more than likely means it will focus on which
areas need invading via the “Responsibility to Protect” to procure resources for the 1% as a “humanitarian” effort. The pattern already exists. In doing so, the push for an “open society” moves forward. Secretary of State John Kerry, who at a commencement speech earlier this week told students to prepare for a “borderless world”, was scheduled to attend as was UK Prime Minister David Cameron, who advocated for Britain to remain in the E.U. and, after meeting Amal, referred to Nasheed as a “friend”. The timing is not coincidental. As the Clooneys arrived in Cannes, Amal with her $3,000 purse and George in jeans and a T-shirt advertising his Casamigos Tequila, the pro open border, pro globalist Soros crew of Clooney’s “humanitarian” Enough Project was in Muslim run London figuring out new ways to manipulate language to facilitate the UN takeover of sovereign nations. Smoke and mirrors.
Once in Cannes, George, usually the center of attention at these types of film festival events, kept a really low profile. The only seemingly staged “spontaneous” pap shots they got were at a restaurant far from the red carpet where he dined not with his friends or his co-stars but with Amal’s relatives and Up in the Air and Money Monster co-producers Daniel Dubiecki and Lara Alameddine with Amal in a $2,000 top and her “ethically mined diamond” on full display.
Then the moment came. Her highness took to the red carpet decked out in a $100K dress, prepared to take the world by storm. She managed to get herself included in the cast photos wearing bright yellow to stand out as everyone was in black. However, true to form, she proved once again a PR fabrication. She tripped going up the steps, needing her man to help her get up and walk to the top, and once again attempted a crotch shot. Classless, tasteless, and certainly detracted from the “UN Hollywood Superpower Couple” the headlines were pre-written to push. Compared to Blake Lively, who showed up not only in the same dress but in a different color, pregnant, and solo, Amal looks the antithesis once again of the strong, independent, feminist her dossier claims to be.
Whether it be the “training exercise” mistaken as a possible ISIS attack outside the Clooneys 5 star hotel or some other issue, they high tailed it out of France the next day and
by all accounts headed back to their newly refurbished $15 million compound in Britain complete with gates and closed circuit television, missing the documentary Risk about Amal’s (former?) client Assange and, of course, Clinton Cash about which George knows a lot. If they fled due to a possible ISIS attack to the walls and security of their mega