We knew it was coming. That time in 2016 when George Clooney, longtime detractor of Hillary Clinton at one time calling her the “most polarizing figure in politics”, would be told by his globalist puppet masters that the moment had come to accomplish the goal off America’s sovereignty by guaranteeing Hillary’s election. After all, Clooney has helped collapse the sovereignties of other nations across the globe under the guise of “humanitarianism” via the U.N. and George Soros’s Center for American “Progress”. CAP was founded for and with the help of Clinton herself and is also where all of Clooney’s “humanitarian” work is housed, such as the “Enough Project” and “The Sentry”. “Meet the Clooneys” at Red Nation Rising.com tracks the Soros/Clooney history, showing just how entrenched Clooney is with the globalists to accomplish this goal. This piece, however, serves to show how Clinton and the Clooneys are self-serving 1% globalists whose “humanitarian” actions speak louder than word and actually do more harm than good to those they claim to want to help, especially women and homosexuals.
The Clintons and the Clooneys are neither “humanitarians” nor “human rights” activists. They, like Soros, “appreciate that a human-rights mantra, particularly when amplified with the U.N.’s global megaphone, is a formidable tool for manipulating public policy. A tool, mind you, and not a principle… all sharing common goals: diminishing American power and mothballing the idea of unadulterated universal values”. One area Hillary Clinton and George Clooney claim to support as a “human rights” issue is “free speech”. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
However, historically to globalists like Clinton and Clooney, “free speech” means “speech which aligns with their politics” and/or “speech with which they agree”. As such, let’s take a look at several times the Obama administration violated this right while Clooney and Clinton remained silent, keeping in mind Clooney helped get Obama elected and Hillary retained the position of Secretary of State during
Obama’s first term. One violation occurred when the administration used the IRS to target conservative, Christian and pro-Israel organizations, donors, and citizens. Then, later that same year, the Obama Justice Department ordered criminal investigations of Fox News reporters for doing their jobs. Next, under a new proposal from the State Department, posting information on the Internet about common firearms could be interpreted as “illegally sharing sensitive information with foreign nationals”. This plan combines two constitutional violations: gun control with control over free speech. Obama then signed a bill into law that allows the Secret Service to arrest anyone publicly protesting within their vicinity. H.R. 347 is in clear violation of the First Amendment being that it limits our free speech, our right to assemble peaceably, and to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” In addition, the Federal Communications Commission regulated the Internet despite a court order from the Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. stating that the FCC does not have the power to do so. These are just a few examples of not just the suppression of free speech and the first amendment in this country but possible punishment for what could be viewed as dissent. Keep this in mind as Obama visits Cuba, where he took a photo in front of a picture of the murderous racist and homophobic Che and then claimed the U.S. could learn something about “human rights” from a communist country with a horrible human rights record as Amal Clooney, in a speech in the UAE, pretended to speak out against silencing dissent but using tweets to control the “narrative” while making no mention of the human rights abuses by the Middle Eastern countries heavily represented at said speech, especially Saudi Arabia. Selective indignation to push their political agendas.
To further see how Clinton and the Clooneys work to destroy our first amendment, look no further than Benghazi and the Sony hack scandal. At the time of the Benghazi attack, both Obama and Clinton were engaged in highly covert and illicit arms smuggling operation moving weapons from Libya through Turkey to the anti-Assad rebels in Syria. What were global elitists who run on a mantra of “Republicans love war” to do? They falsely imprisoned Nakoula Bassely Nakoula, the maker of a YouTube video entitled “The Innocence of Muslims”. Hillary and Obama used this guy as a scapegoat for the Benghazi terror attack on our Libyan embassy that left four of our guys dead to protect his presidential re-election in 2012 and her expected nomination in 2016. The director of this YouTube video spent one year in jail. Not only that, after the attacks, Clinton and Obama fiercely condemned the video multiple times, and even spent $70,000 on television ads in Pakistan condemning it. Clooney seemed torn about these events when he said from his rarified air at a red carpet event for “Argo” the following month: “I’m not quite sure that those diplomats did die as a result of that movie. It seems more like that was a coordinated effort by Al Qaeda” which, of course, it was. Not only that, it was later proven that the administration knew of the impending attack ten days before it occurred and did nothing. However, Obama had an election to win, so Mr. “Je Suis Charlie” Clooney ran with the YouTube video talking point and used the incarceration of the innocent man who made this video, clearly a violation of his “human rights”, as an opportunity to trash the first amendment and free speech when he continued, “But the simple truth is that in order to make (democracy) work, the idiots get to have their say, too. And that’s unfortunate”. Once again their “selective outrage” for all things “human rights” oriented is only relevant when politically expedient.
George Clooney’s denouncing of the first amendment while pretending to care about “free speech” proves blatantly apparent with the Sony Hack scandal. After the release of the first batch of emails, which showed Clooney as an incredibly insecure individual who worries a great deal about his public persona, he seized on the opportunity to try to re-establish himself as some sort of “leader” and bastion of “free speech”, failing miserably. Clooney’s buddy Obama quickly blamed North Korea for the attack, leading Obama to renew his push for net neutrality which, in essence, gives the federal government control over the internet essentially the greatest free exchange of information mankind has known.
Clooney said nothing regarding Obama’s “Wag the Dog” proxy war with North Korea to do this. Instead, Clooney claimed to have drafted a petition to release “The Interview” that he supposedly circulated to the studio heads to have them sign as a show of solidarity for the first amendment; however, no one signed it. Turns out, there probably was not one. Many of the studio heads said they never saw it, but if they did, they said they would have signed it. Clooney claims they are full of it, but when asked to name names, he declined. His “petition” seemed a way to save face with the American people pretending that he cared about their values while remaining silent on Obama’s push to control “freedom of the press” via net neutrality. Again, faux indignation to suit their political agenda.
In addition to “free speech”, Hillary and George claim their huge support for women and gays makes Hillary the “humanitarian” choice for President. Wrong. Hillary and the Clooneys have deep ties to Muslim extremist groups, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood, where women are treated like objects and gays even worse. Obama’s vaulted “Arab Spring” which saw the Brotherhood forcibly put into power in many Middle Eastern nations the establishment of which began under Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State with close to $2 billion dollars of U.S. taxpayer dollars, was not a progression to democracy but a regression to repression. When the Muslim Brotherhood took over from the deposited Mubarak in Egypt, a Sharia Law compliant Constitution was immediately enforced. Under Sharia Law, women have no power and are treated as mostly second class citizens. According to “Sharia Law: Islamic Sharia Law”, “A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage at age 9, a girl’s clitoris should be cut, and beat his wife for insubordination”. Conversely a woman, “must have four male witnesses to prove a rape, cannot testify against her accused rapist, inherits only half of what a male heir inherits, cannot drive a car, and cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband” among other items. These are the people “pro-women” Hillary and Obama and subsequently “human rights activist” George Clooney put into power. Furthermore, in 2013, when the U.N. voted to ratify the declaration titled “End Violence Against Women” this same Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt released an official statement saying this declaration would “unravel the very fabric of the civilized world” where control, particularly over women, lies “firmly in the hands of men”. There were ten points specifically which they did not want women to have as a result of this declaration:
- Granting girls full sexual freedom, as well as the freedom to decide their own gender and the gender of their partners (i.e., choose to have normal or homo- sexual relationships), while raising the age of marriage.
- Providing contraceptives for adolescent girls and training them to use those, while legalizing abortion to get rid of unwanted pregnancies, in the name of sexual and reproductive rights.
- Granting equal rights to adulterous wives and illegitimate sons resulting from adulterous relationships.
- Granting equal rights to homosexuals, and providing protection and respect for prostitutes.
- Giving wives full rights to file legal complaints against husbands accusing them of rape or sexual harassment
- Equal inheritance (between men and women).
- Replacing guardianship with partnership, and full sharing of roles within the family between men and women such as: spending, child care and home chores
- Full equality in marriage legislation such as: allowing Muslim women to marry non-Muslim men, and abolition of polygamy, dowry, men taking charge of family spending, etc.
- Removing the authority of divorce from husbands and placing it in the hands of judges, and sharing all property after divorce.
- Cancelling the need for a husband’s consent in matters like: travel, work, or use of contraception.
This seems quite a contradictory platform to those claiming to be “human rights” activist specifically “for women”. Then again, check out the Clinton Crime Syndicate to see the history of their personal “war on women”. In any event, the Egyptian people saw thorough this charade, and in 2013 an Egyptian uprising saw over 20 million citizens march to overthrow the Brotherhood, Sharia Law, and the Obama/Clinton/Clooney agenda. Jay Kekulow of Foxnews wrote,
“Against this backdrop of Sharia and jihad – and hidden behind the blanket news coverage of the Obama administration’s other scandals – the White House has decided to increase its financial support for the Muslim Brotherhood, quietly clearing the way for the U.S. to give Egypt $1.3 billion in military aid.
On May 10, the very day that Lois Lerner issued her contrived apology for the IRS targeting conservative groups, (remember this first amendment violation from earlier?) Secretary of State John Kerry formally waived – on national security grounds – statutory requirements that he certify that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government was ‘implementing policies to protect freedom of expression, association, and religion, and due process of law’ before providing any further American military aid.
Think about this for a moment: The Obama administration threw the Mubarak regime (for all its flaws, a stalwart American ally that kept peace with Israel) under the bus ostensibly because of its human rights violations but is waiving human rights conditions to prop up a more brutal jihadist government”.
Exactly. Next week, when Hillary Clinton and George and Amal Clooney get on their “pro women” and “pro-gay” “human rights” platforms during her $33,000/plate “we need to get big money out of politics (Citizens United-1A)” fundraiser at the Clooneys home, remember what they really support.
Both Hillary Clinton and George Clooney pride themselves on being big supporters of “gay rights”, yet they fundraise for and support the political ideology that treats not only women as second class citizens but gays, too. In 2008, Brotherhood Executive Bureau member Mahmoud Ghozlan emphasized that homosexuality needed to be outlawed. Then Fahad Qureshi, who founded Islam Net and is considered an Islamic leader in Norway, told a large group of Sunni Muslims that, contrary to media claims that it is only “radicals” and “extremists” who support barbaric punishments for those who violate Sharia, regular Muslims support such things, including the “death penalty for homosexuals” and “stoning for adultery.” Yes, these are the politics that the Clintons and the Clooneys support behind the scenes while pushing “human rights” and “equality” to the pop culture masses.
Do not think theClintons and Clooneys will not bring the establishment of a Sharia based form of government here. They already have. The Obama administration has many Muslim Brotherhood members in high ranking positions.Additionally, while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, Huma Abedin, the wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), was her Deputy Chief of Staff. Abedin worked from 1996 to 2003 at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), a journal of Islamic supremacism founded by al-Qaeda financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef. At the same time Abedin also worked for Hillary Clinton in different capacities. Naseef hired Abedin’s father, the late Dr. Zyed Abedin, to oversee the JMMA in Saudi Arabia. As Andrew McCarthy notes, “[t]he journal was operated under the management of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, a virulently anti-Semitic and sharia-supremacist organization. When Dr. Abedin died, editorial control of the journal passed to his wife, Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin — Huma’s mother.” Abedin’s mother was also a “sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women). Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief . This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al- Qaradawi.” Rumors abounded at that time that Clooney tried to romance Abedin. He denied it. However, his rep Stan Rosenfield did confirm they had met and Ben Affleck stated that she helped as a “consultant” on “Argo”.
Furthermore, several cities in the U.S. are now governed by Sharia Law. The first city to do so was Dearborn, MI. This has led to states such as Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, North Carolina and Alabama to pass legislation “banning sharia”, which “human rights activists” promptly declared “xenophobic” and/or “islamophobic”. The term “islamophobia” was coined in the 1990’s, and became the focus of an active Muslim Brotherhood campaign after 9/11 led by Islamist lobby organizations, including several headed by Clooney co-hort Vartan Gregorian, financial backer of Clooney’s “100 Lives and Aurora Prize” initiative. Gregorian and various Muslim civil rights activists groups have pushed the notion that Americans are deeply prejudice against Muslims. Clooney did, too, the other day when he said, “If you listen to the loudest voices out there today, you’d think we’re a country that hates Mexicans, hates Muslims”. These people do have the megaphone of the U.N. making them the “loudest voices out there” because FBI data on hate crimes show this not to be the case. In fact, “prejudicial crimes” against Muslims have actually shown to decrease since 9/11. The globalists never let facts get in the way to agenda push, though. The faux indignation their “loudest voices” cry currently regarding “xenophobia” overshadows the ideology behind the radical Islam they are thus protecting which has detrimental policies towards the women and gays they claim to support in the U.S. Amazing.
Further proof? Remember the “Beverly Hills Hotel” incident a few years ago when a few of the Hollywood elite, like Jay Leno and Ellen DeGeneres, “discovered” that the Sultan of Brunei, who owns the hotel, abides by Sharia Law? It seemed a bit shocking that more celebrity “gay right” and “glass ceiling” activists like George Clooney did not help out. Clooney will get arrested for protesting “human right violations” in the Sudan but not put his neck out for a cause in his own backyard that supports gays while calling out actual “human right” violations? No. That will not happen. Why? He and his political ilk support it, fund it, and get it set up in countries around the world.
In addition, Clooney’s friends continually take money from these Sharia compliant areas of the world. Matt Damon’s anti-fracking film “Promise land” and, yes, Mr. “The Sky is Falling” Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” were all funded by the UAE. In addition, Obama and Hillary keep up the charade while still doing business with Sharia Law compliant states worldwide. Michelangelo Signorile from the Huffington Post states, “A far more abhorrent connection with the sultan than a few hotels is the trade pact with Brunei (and other Pacific nations), the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which President Obama has been doggedly pursuing since 2009. As noted by Curtis Ellis of the American Jobs Alliance, ‘on the very day Brunei was phasing in Sharia law, Obama’s chief trade negotiator Michael Froman was on Capitol Hill selling the TransPacific Partnership, which would bind the U.S. to Brunei and give the Islamic Sultanate special economic privileges.’” The “war on women” and “homophobia”, are only platforms used to promote faux rage and hate here to win elections in the United States.
As for Hillary’s ovaries, yes, America is ready for a woman President, just not this one so tied to Soros, the Muslim Brotherhood, and radicals around the world who want us eliminated. Clinton, Clooney and Obama like to tell us whenever they can that “That’s not who we are”. Correct. We are not Sharia compliant U.N. subjects, and Hillary’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia law prove she does not represent “who we are”. In addition to her personal aide Huma Abedin’s deep Brotherhood ties, according to Matthew Vadum, author of “Clinton Muslim Brotherhood Operative Arrested in Egypt” from 2013:
“The arrest of Gehad el-Haddad, a Muslim Brotherhood leader arrested by Egyptian authorities for inciting violence, was a sobering reminder not just of how close Hillary Clinton’s network is to the Brotherhood but also of the extent to which Islamist enemies of the United States has infiltrated the American political establishment. A mere month after Haddad quit his Clinton Foundation job for full-time employment with the Brotherhood, the now-deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi received an invitation to deliver a major address at the Clinton Global Initiative, a high-profile project of the foundation. Those who support the Global War on Terror should bear in mind that Haddad’s experience at the Clinton Foundation gave him the know-how to help build the terror apparatus, police state, and other oppressive institutions that would be required to turn Egypt into a totalitarian theocracy, which is the Brotherhood’s goal.”
Furthermore, one of the biggest human rights violators in the world is Saudi Arabia; however, when given the opportunity to call them out, the Clooneys do not. Amal had the perfect opportunity do so in her UAE speech last week but no. She went on about Tweeting, instead. Why? The Saudis are huge financial contributors to Mrs. Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and the democrat party. A few examples of the human rights violations committed by this nation enabled by the silence and payoffs to those who claim to support the oppressed:
- In October 2014, three lawyers, Dr. Abdulrahman al-Subaihi, Bander al-Nogaithan and Abdulrahman al-Rumaih , were sentenced to up to eight years in prison for using Twitter to criticize the Ministry of Justice.
- In March 2015, Yemen’s Sunni President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi was forced into exile after a Shia-led insurgency. A Saudi Arabia-led coalition has responded with air strikes in order to reinstate Mr Hadi. It has since been accused of committing war crimes in the country.
- Women who supported the Women2Drive campaign, launched in 2011 to challenge the ban on women driving vehicles, faced harassment and intimidation by the authorities. The government warned that women drivers would face arrest.
- All public gatherings are prohibited under an order issued by the Interior Ministry in 2011. Those defy the ban face arrest, prosecution and imprisonment on charges such as “inciting people against the authorities”.
- In March 2014, the Interior Ministry stated that authorities had deported over 370,000 foreign migrants and that 18,000 others were in detention. Thousands of workers were returned to Somalia and other states where they were at risk of human rights abuses, with large numbers also returned to Yemen, in order to open more jobs to Saudi Arabians. Many migrants reported that prior to their deportation they had been packed into overcrowded makeshift detention facilities where they received little food and water and were abused by guards.
- Raif Badawi was sentenced to 1000 lashes and 10 years in prison for using his liberal blog to criticize Saudi Arabia’s clerics. He has already received 50 lashes, which have reportedly left him in poor health.
- Dawood al-Marhoon was arrested aged 17 for participating in an anti-government protest. After refusing to spy on his fellow protestors, he was tortured and forced to sign a blank document that would later contain his ‘confession’. At Dawood’s trial, the prosecution requested death by crucifixion while refusing him a lawyer.
- Ali Mohammed al-Nimr was arrested in 2012 aged either 16 or 17 for participating in protests during the Arab spring. His sentence includes beheading and crucifixion. He is the nephew of a prominent government dissident.
Further proof of Hillary’s “human rights” hypocrisy via Saudi Arabia came with her “Email Scandal”. The emails showed that as Secretary of State, “Hillary Clinton made weapons transfer to the Saudi government a ‘top priority,’ according to her closest military aide. These emails showed that her aides kept her well-informed of the approval process for a $29.4 billion sale in 2011 of up to 84 advanced F-15SA fighters, manufactured by Boeing, along with upgrades to the pre-existing Saudi fleet of 70 F-15 aircraft and munitions, spare parts, training, maintenance, and logistics. The deal was finalized on Christmas Eve 2011. Afterward, Jake Sullivan, then Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and now a senior policy adviser on her presidential campaign, sent her a celebratory email string topped with the chipper message: ‘FYI — good news.’ Said fighters were used in a brutal Saudi air campaign in Yemen which killed at least 2,800 civilians and could amount to war crimes. War crimes? Clooney also said in her statement the other day that the “the loudest voices out there today…. thinks that committing war crimes is the best way to make America great again”. Seems that way in voting for Hillary.
One would also think that, as a great “human rights” attorney with Muslim ties (her mother is Sunni) , Amal Clooney would take the opportunity her available media platform gives her as one of the “loudest voices out there today” to expose the human rights atrocities of countries like Saudi Arabia and ideologies such as Sharia Law. However, she does not. Instead, she defends human rights violators, many of whom are tied to the Muslim Brotherhood. Mohammed Fahmy, the Egyptian journalist who was “pardoned”, has Brotherhood ties. Mrs. Clooney released a statement from behind one of her husband’s four guarded and gated mansions in which she declared the Egyptian government threatened to arrest her for speaking out against it in her effort to support “free speech”. Seems her bluff was called, much like that of her husband with the Sony scandal. The Egyptian government asked for specific names of those who threatened her, and she declined to name them. She then apologized saying the threat was not real. Nasheed of the Maldives has Soros and Brotherhood ties, as well. Then there are the actual terrorists she either represented or currently represents.
Saif-al-Islam Gaddafi, yes, Mommar’s son, is affiliated with the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing, the 1988 Lockerbie bombing and the 1989 UTA Flight 772 bombing. Then there is Gaddafi’s partner, Abdullah Senussi, remembered for his involvement in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing in which 270 people were killed, masterminding the bombing of a French airliner over Niger in 1989 in which 170 people were killed. Another client is King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa of Bahrain where the ruling family’s hold on the judicial process has “increasingly taken a turn for the worse, with no end in sight for the prosecution of high-profile government critics, a curtailing of the right to any meaningful form of protest or assembly and an escalating human rights abuse record, which includes rampant, unabated torture”, according to Human Rights Watch. Then there is Ibrahim Halawa, son of Hussein Halawa, the leading Muslim Brotherhood cleric in Ireland, who became caught up in the violent Egyptian military crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood in Aug 2013 after taking part in protests. He and his siblings were detained by the Egyptian military, and there were pleas in Ireland for their release. These are just a few but representative of whom and what she defends as being consistent with whom and what Clinton and Clooney support which is an anti-west, anti-Israel, anti-human rights, anti-free speech, and pro-Muslim globalism agenda.
This continues with their push for “open borders” amid the “refugee crisis” George Soros has admitted, when called out by the Prime Minister of Hungary, to manufacturing the “migrant crisis” because “borders are the problem”. Amal’s role in this “refugee crisis” is to push her overblown PR story as an empathetic “poor refugee” herself which, of course, she was not. Was there a civil war? Yes. Did she come to the UK destitute and work her way up from poverty? All signs point to no. Her family was considered well off in Lebanon: “a government minister and the founder of Lebanon’s airline were among their relatives, and they settled in a comfortable home in Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire”. Gerard’s Cross was named the second richest town in England by The Telegraph in 2013. Consider the high school she attended, Dr. Challoner’s, is a private school where the tuition runs currently as “£4322 for a junior term and £6970 for a senior Term”. From there she went to St. Hugh’s, an Oxford college, from where she graduated in 2000. St Hugh’s was sued in 2013 for choosing applicants based on their ability to pay, meaning the school only takes students from wealthy families. The school did not deny this. It seems Amal has enjoyed the 1% lifestyle afforded to her in the west for most, if not all, of her life.
Amal’s has been actively involved in the “open borders” push for quite some time. She clerked at the International Court of Justice, which becomes important later where the “Responsibility to Protect” and “Restrain the Veto” initiatives promoting the elimination the national borders for UN governance. For one semester while at NYU, she worked as a student law clerk in the offices of current Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor., which provides us with an early connection to Soros as Sotomayor appeared before the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, a left-wing group funded by Soros’ Open Society Institute. In fact, Soros recommended her for SCOTUS. Accordingly, Sotomayor wrote the foreword for The International Judge where, according to an analyst on the Foreign Policy magazine website, “Sotomayor took what seems to be a positive view toward the construction of international courts and legal institutions.” Her rulings suggest that she “sides with those who believe that foreign case law should at least be considered” in domestic cases, showing Sotomayor heavily favors Soros’ “open borders society” over national sovereignty. It proves fitting that Amal clerked for her. In 2004, Amal worked under Judge Vladen S. Vereshchetin from Russia and Judge Nabil Elaraby from Egypt supported the overthrow of Mubarak in lieu of the Muslim Brotherhood backed Morsi.
However, as she, her hubby, and Hillary run around as the “loudest voices” for putting illegals over citizens, none of them have offered to house any of these “refugees” in their mega mansion nor have they offered to fund any of them directly.
Hillary has armed secret service protection. George had special privacy laws made for him and Amal in Italy. He has a fence and CCTV at their English estate. In addition, when George and Amal met with “refugees” after their staged visit with Angela Merkel,it was not a refugee camp but in a nicely furnished politician’s office with handpicked “refugees”…conveniently a woman and a child…with Amal dressed in her thousands of dollars of haute couture, full blow out, and done face. At least when Angelina Jolie plays the role, she dresses down and appears in a camp, even if it is raining. Of course, as two of the “loudest voices out there”, the Clooney’s job is to “narrative craft”, which is to scream “xenophobia” if one should question mass influx of unvetted migrants into one’s country instead of protecting the “human rights” of those oppressed by said unvetted migrants such as the Rotherdam in the UK where it is estimated that 1,400 children had been sexually abused in the town between 1997 and 2013, predominantly by gangs of British-Pakistani men, that was covered up for fear of “giving oxygen” to racism and 2015 New Year’s Eve attacks in Cologne, Germany where over 500 women reported being raped or sexually assaulted. Sure….let’s listen to the one “adult in the room” who takes selfies with the Kardashians. Then again, this bold statement is from the guy who helped give us a President who does interviews with a youtuber who bathes in a bathtub filled with milk and Fruit Loops.
So, no, the Clintons and the Clooneys are in no way supporters of “human rights” “free speech”, “women”, “gays” or any other “feel good” platform them claim to support….unless it is politically expedient. As the “for the little guy” Clooneys get ready to hold their $33,000/plate fundraiser for Hillary, expect more of this type of rhetoric from them in the form of “Trump is xenophobic”, the Soros funded Black Lives Matter “protestors” should be celebrated for shutting down Trump’s “hate speech”, and that what occurred in Belgium should not lead to conversations of racist and xenophobic border control talk. Remember…the only “speech” allowed is speech sanctioned by their politics….and they will be the loudest voices speaking during the next few weeks.