Chapter 21: Clooney “Democracy” Takes a Hit
2016 was to be the relaunch of the Clooneys as “humanitarians” in their push to derail the worldwide collapse of their 1% politics. The opposite happened. See, Clooney famously stated in 2013 after Obama’s re-election about Obamacare, “People keep talking about how this has to be a great negotiation, but there isn’t any negotiating a law. We negotiate on all these other topics, but this was put into law, and [Obama] was reelected on it. It was reaffirmed, it was passed through the Supreme Court — it’s a law. You don’t like it? Win an election. That’s how it works. That’s how the country works. But you don’t get to shut down the government because of it. That’s not how it works.” There is no negotiating a
law? Oh, my. Maybe not in tyrannical globalist 1% politics but there surely is in a constitutional republic. Then again, the 1% are not affected by Obamacare in any capacity as they have the time and money to get the care they deem best whenever and wherever they want, even if it means creating a huge carbon footprint as he did just before his wedding in September of 2014 when he took a private jet to Germany to see a private physician about back problems. So his snarky advice was to win an election? People took it. Win an election the opposition did—many of them. The politics that Clooney has shoved down our throats (but from which he himself is exempt) were resoundingly defeated in the midterm elections of 2014 in the United States. Not only was there a historic “sweep” with democrats losing local and state races across the country, but the GOP also elected women, minorities, and much younger candidates in, as The Huffington Post said, “a legislative body that has historically been dominated by older, white men”. The primary reasons for this “sweep” involved opposition to Obamacare, the Islamic State insurgency, the border crisis—basically the economy which has rapidly declined under Obama and national security which is non-existent in a “global citizen” world. The icing on the proverbial cake that tempered Clooney’s hubris was when in November of 2014 his homestate of Kentucky“lost four of the five statewide constitutional offices they held coming into the election, including the governor’s office for just the second time since 1971”. That governor, Matt Bevin, is a Tea Party candidate—the same Tea Party that sat in solidarity
with Elie Weisel during Netanyahu’s speech against a nuclear Iran. Clooney’s politics have been rejected soundly nationally and not just by “gun clinging Bible thumpers” but by American citizens who see what is happening to our country. It is no longer Democrat versus Republican. It is citizens versus globalists. By now, we know on which side Clooney resides.
The trouncing of his politics is not just domestic, though. It is worldwide, especially regarding the Soros orchestrated “migrant crisis”. In Austria, the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) has stepped in against the tide of “refugees”. Denmark’s Danish People’s Party (DF) has been so successful that it now has the balance of power and has threatened to topple the government if it attempts to soften its stance on immigration. The Finns Party (PS) in Finland is essentially left-wing with its economic policies but is allied to a hardline stance on immigration. In France, the Front National (FN) party stunned Europe with its rise to power which came about due to its concerns about high immigration and home grown extremism. Germany. Greece. Hungary (already noted as their Prime Minister called out Soros for orchestrating this “migrant crisis”). Clooney’s favorite spot on the planet, Italy, has seen the far right Northern League party make real strides against the socialist government due to the “migrant crisis” with a landslide 50% of the vote in regions of Veneto and Lombardy. It also got 20% of the electorate in Tuscany, the left-wing heartland of the Democratic Party. The Netherlands. Sweden is on the verge of collapse. Switzerland. Keep in mind Europe has watched these “refugees” erase their borders for many years now, long before they started erasing the U.S. border. They know that the majority of those coming are not “women and children” but young, healthy menand only about half are from Syria. Most claim they are not fleeing because of war but for the “benefits” the west has to offer, which is why they land in welfare states.
There is a reason why none of the rich Arab nations in the Middle East such as Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain are taking these “war refugees”. They have denied them entry mostly due to fears of terrorism. Clooney’s buddies do not want them and as Clooney’s beloved migrants arrive in his cherished Lake Como, it seems neither he, Amal, nor the other 1% residents want them:
“The new pictures of migrants taking over Como’s main train station come a week after residents expressed concerns over the growing numbers of migrants camping as they wait to slip over the nearby border into Switzerland.
Swiss authorities have placed an effective shut down on their border to asylum seekers, meaning women, men and children have been forced to camp out in the glitzy Italian town.”
Before June, migrants were able to board a train in Como to cross the border into Switzerland where they would claim refuge or carry on to Germany.
However, as Swiss politicians fear an influx of migrants similar to Germany last year, they have cracked down on border entries.”
Nowhere is George seen telling Lake Como residents that they’re not “doing enough”. In fact, “The Swiss Government announced plans yesterday to increase the speed of processing asylum seekers after two-thirds of the Swiss electorate voted for the plan in a recent referendum.” It pays to be rich and know the problems they create can go away with a couple of greased palms. Clooney does have special “privacy” laws written for himself and the Mrs. in Italy, and they have a gate and CCTV installed around their British mansion, so their biggest risk is probably a decrease in property values. The rest of the world, however, is supposed to drop their borders, share their wealth, and allow the Muslim invasion to occur as a “humanitarian” effort or risk being called a “xenophobe”.
June of 2016 proved the biggest hit in the Clooney/Soros globalization push. First off, Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty was before the Supreme Court and, with Justice Scalia dead and the likes of UN backed justices like Sotomayor and Kagan on the bench, the possibility for a “win” seemed better than ever, even though per the Constitution, it should have been a 8-0 decision. The decision came to a 4-4 split, thus effectively ending Obama’s amnesty for 11 million illegals as well as his halting of deportations and non-enforcement of our immigration laws. This came as a shock to the Soros crew as the Soros leaks revealed that they had banked on a victory. Soros had, after all, applied pressure to “secure a desired outcome in a U.S. Supreme Court case on illegal immigration enforcement” while Obama had the language “expanded” to include mass influx from Central America. Have no fear, the Department of “Justice” is “reviewing” the decision. Why? SCOTUS is the “law”, right? Obamacare? Gay Marriage? Only when it suits the agenda. A Clooney/Soros “Democratic” SCOTUS victory would have completely eliminated our borders while automatically legalizing ELEVEN MILLION UNVETTED illegals, key for November, and paved the way for the North American Union, much like the European Union which had its own death knell this week.
Then, in a historical referendum, and to the dismay and amazement of the globalists who have run rampant over the laws of sovereign nations the last 20 years or so, the people of Britain voted to leave the EU. This “democracy in action”, much like, say, the South Sudan vote in 2012, could conceivably cause the collapsed of the vaunted European Union. This has caused globalists like George Sorosto have public meltdowns of epic proportions. The EU was the model “superstate” for the few “superstates” the globalists have worked on fusing together for most of the last 40 years. Makes ruling easier as a few large bodies instead of many small ones. As of now, nine other countries have called for similar types of referendums, forcing the elites of the EU to publicly reveal their long held plan of eliminating sovereign nations to create one superstate. The “open borders society” these globalists have pursued “politically” for decades took a huge hit twice in the same day last week, and not a word from Mr. Democracy.
It does seem that the PR spin was ready for the UN Supercouple to take the reigns with the expected victories in both cases, though, as an obviously staged pap event occurred in Italy the night before these two decisions, presenting the Clooneys as all “loved up and on vacation” at a “romantic dinner”…with about 30 other people. However, it was not
reported publicly until after both votes and with little fanfare. Was there a whole story written about the “success of Obama’s amnesty at SCOTUS” combined with the “People of Britain having spoken in support of open borders” to portray the Clooneys as some sort of advocates for “humanitarian globalism” planned to coincide with their smiling faces of celebration as the pics were held off until the day AFTER the referendums? Instead, this story went into seemingly limited release, focused heavily on her outfit (of course) and mentioned the papal visit again. One would think that “Mr. Democracy” would be staging press conferences chastising those evil 1% globalists calling for a Brexit do-over as a champion of the “little guy”. Of course not. This is a guy who said the people of California got Prop 8 wrong…twice…and then celebrated when five unelected justices overturned the votes of tens of millions of people to fit the Soros gay agenda. He did the same when SCOTUS rewrote Obamacare from the bench (which is illegal) forcing us all into that. Besides, the leader of the “re-vote” brigade is none other than Mr. Khan, who appeared with Amal’s buddy Prime Minister David Cameron at a “Vote Leave” rally, and Mr. Soros. George would never think of selling out his top sugar daddy. In the meantime, the 1% puppets in the media, as orchestrated, threw cries of “xenophobia” and “racist” at those who voted to leave….
The Clooneys are not concerned with the human rights violations in these mostly Sharia run countries because their goal is to import it to the Western world. There are 88 Sharia courts in Amal’s base country of England, and it has started to infiltrate the U.S. They accomplish this by silencing dissenters of open borders with cries of “islamophobia”, “racism” and “xenophobia”. This is why , on Monday, December 28th, 2015, the Clooneys’ employer, George Soros , publically called on voters to “resist the siren song of the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz” in an op-ed for The Guardian entitled “The Terrorists and Demagogues Want Us to be Scared. We Mustn’t Give In”. From there, as expected, he went on to condemn the non-existent “Islamophobia” of the likes of Cruz and Trump and says we must “reaffirm our commitment to the principles of an open society”. George and Amal then used their public platforms not to condemn terrorism or the genocide of Christians by Muslim extremists worldwide but to use it to label the “right wing extremists”, who, at this rate, are anyone in the world who do not agree with their globalists politics, and their “xenophobia” the real problem in order to push the “open borders” “open society” agenda.
In between the Hail Caesar flop and the Cannes premiere of the Lara Alameddine co-produced Money Monster, George took the cue from his handler to whine about Trump’s supposed “xenophobia” in interviews, claiming that is not who “we” are before getting on board with the #imwithher Hillary Clinton campaign. Keep in mind that the current state of the Middle East, including the “refugee crisis” which exploded in just the past few years, was set up under Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Keep in mind that the
current Libyan debacle is the cornerstone of Hillary’s foreign policy. Remember she blamed a YouTube video for the Benghazi attack and let an innocent film director sit in prison to take the fall. Talk about a free speech violation. And, of course, there is the War on Women that is Bill Clinton. This is who the Clooneys support. They helped Clinton raise over $15 million dollars for her campaign via two fundraisers, one in San Francisco hosted by an Iranian Muslim, Shervin Pishevar, and one at their house in Los Angeles where they charged $343K/couple. Immediately public backlash commenced over the
amounts being thrown around by these 1%ers who pretend to be for the “little guy” while vilifying “big money in politics”. George said he would not have to host such events if Citizens United was overturned by the Supreme Court. No, Clooney is not woefully misinformed. Neither is Mrs. Clinton. They know Citizens United was one case, not a law; however, he and Hillary stump for votes on this issue because if they get their way and eventually this ruling is “overturned”, it erodes more of the first amendment which we have already seen the Clooneys try to undermine from “ethically mined diamonds” in the Congo to “Islamophobia” in the west to the gay agenda in the U.S. forcing religious institutions to violate their beliefs under the guise of “tolerance” and “equality”. The Clooneys hate our first amendment.
As such, Amal, too, turned her attention to Donald Trump, purposefully misquoting him while having the audacity to claim she understood “American values”. Amal Clooney would recognize an American value if it bit her.
Rick Wells of Constitution Rising states:
“She said, ‘If you actually look at what [Trump] specifically says in that now infamous speech about Muslims, he kept saying, ‘They only want jihad; they don’t believe in our way of life; they don’t respect our system…And when he says ‘they’… And, you know, you watch the media coverage afterwards and people should’ve been saying, ‘Do you mean the 1.5 billion people around the world who fit that description? Do you mean the people who are U.S. citizens, who are members of your military, the vast majority of whom are not extremist or violent in any way?’”
Actually he was describing foreigners coming into America, as you well know, Mrs. CAIR mouthpiece, not citizens and not military members, although Nidal Hasan made the point that they should be scrutinized. And most of those 1.5 billion people aren’t coming into the United States; for the small percentage who are, yes – he means them.
She didn’t feel compelled to ask if he meant the terrorists that blew up the airport in Brussels or killed 130 innocent people in Paris or 14 in San Bernardino or the service men in Chattanooga. She didn’t mention the argumentative, non-assimilating and threatening foreigners that we all have the unpleasant occasion to deal with, who demand that we cater to their wishes, including a separate legal and banking system, prayer times during the work day and other accommodations. She should be familiar with the ones who demand special considerations under the threat of legal action.
She also doesn’t bother to ask about the forced importation against our will of uncivilized foreigners and others who might be civilized but whose cultures are incompatible with our Constitution and therefore with the basic most premise for immigration.”
Of course she does not mention any of this. It does not fit the narrative. She and her husband have both claimed, falsely but true to their narrative, that Trump’s comments are “islamophobic” and “xenophobic”. Interesting, then, that Democrats currently have a bill before Congress to criminalize any negative speech regarding Islam. If passed, Trump could be charged with the same type of crime as the gentleman Amal represented in Armenia. She does not support “free speech”. She supports “controlled speech”.
One aspect of “democracy” the DNC leaks helped prove no longer exists is that of an impartial media. Press talking points from May 5th state Hillary is their candidate. CNNis, indeed, the “Clinton News Network as the DNC fed CNN the questions they wanted to be asked in interviews. POLITICO’s Ken Vogel emailed his stories to the DNC before publishing them. The DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories and
discussing their relationship with NBC, MSNBC, CNN & how to get better treatment. Back when Amal did her propaganda press tour with NBC for her great “human rights” work with former President of the Maldives Mohammed Nasheed, many wondered not only how or why this case garnered such attention in the US but why, when she got to Britain, she had her own NBC videographer/photographer who she called out by name walking out of the airport with her? Now we know why. NBC is a propaganda network for the Clinton machine and the DNC. In the DNC leaks, Chuck Todd specifically comes up, at one point asking for “clearance” to comment on an “approved” talking point. Later Julian Assange called Todd out for his “Sloppy journalism”. Not so shocking now that both George and Amal appeared with him to push their falsified talking points and to push their hate
for Trump, the first amendment, and, well, democracy. They have been trolling the world with their “control the narrative” talking points (at least Amal and her mother, “journalist” Baria Alamuddin have over in the Middle East). It was during her Nasheed propaganda press junkets that Amal declared “Democracy is dead”. The Clooneys helped kill it.
Then there is the proof that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders to benefit Hillary, including using his religion against him. Remember when George alluded support for Bernie? Did he mean it? Maybe. Perhaps he’d signed his life away to George Soros long ago in exchange for supporting this woman later as I have long deduced. Then again, he more than likely knew the system was rigged and she would win. The greatest humanitarian supercouple on the planet cannot support a loser, can they? Of course not. Between Soros funds greasing the palms of Obama appointed judges to have common sense voter ID laws overturned in GOP states, busing in “refugees” illegally throughout the states where Voter ID laws have been overturned, the voter fraud already on the record to confirming its existence, and Hollywood and the media so far in the tank for her as the DNC leaks prove, she really cannot lose. It wouldn’t matter who her opponent is. Democracy is dead? Seems that way…and the Clooneys have led the charge.
This is why the relationship between Amal, Assange, Hillary, and Eric Schmidt of Google is so interesting. She was Assange’s lawyer, now she backs Hillary as Assange attempts to bring Hillary down as Amal is super cozy White House helper Eric Schmidt. Something must have happened when Clooney entered the picture because Assange’s tone soured quite a bit. Just shy of one month before the great nuptials, Julian Assange released a book
entitled “Google is Not What It Seems”. In it, he details the “special relationship” between Google, Hillary Clinton, and the State Department, much of which ties to all that we are finding out now. In this extract, he focuses mostly on the relationship between Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen. It ends with his critique of the Schmidt/Cohen book released in April of 2013 titled “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations, and Businesses”. By the time it came out, Assange:
“had formally sought and received political asylum from the government of Ecuador, and taken refuge in its embassy in London. At that point I had already spent nearly a year in the embassy under police surveillance, blocked from safe passage out of the UK. Online I noticed the press hum excitedly about Schmidt and Cohen’s book, giddily ignoring the explicit digital imperialism of the title and the conspicuous string of pre-publication endorsements from famous warmongers like Tony Blair, Henry Kissinger, Bill Hayden and Madeleine Albright on the back. Billed as a visionary forecast of global technological change, the book failed to deliver—failed even to imagine a future, good or bad, substantially different to the present. The book was a simplistic fusion of Fukuyama “end of history” ideology—out of vogue since the 1990s—and faster mobile phones. It was padded out with DC shibboleths, State Department orthodoxies, and fawning grabs from Henry Kissinger. The scholarship was poor—even degenerate. It did not seem to fit the profile of Schmidt, that sharp, quiet man in my living room. But reading on I began to see that the book was not a serious attempt at future history. It was a love song from Google to official Washington. Google, a burgeoning digital superstate, was offering to be Washington’s geopolitical visionary.”
Her husband continued this narrative during the Money Monster press tour, starting on the red carpet in Cannes, especially with the recent election of the first Muslim as mayor of London. Sadiq Khan is an open borders supporter who refers to himself as the “Muslim
George Clooney”. He, too, has already jumped on the “Trump is xenophobic” bandwagon; however, his true colors are showing much more quickly. Just a few days prior to the election, he referred to moderate Muslims as “Uncle Toms” and the day after getting
elected, he threatened Trump to “let in Muslims, or they will attack America”. Kahn has a long history of association with radical Muslims, but, like Amal, he claims it was only because of his “human rights” job. He has since declared that he is going to set up “online hate crime hubs” in “partnership” with social media firms. Who decides what “crimes” or “language” is subjective? His handlers.
It is worth noting, then, that Soros’s “Enough Project” was holding in London the same time the Clooneys were in Cannes, a “Global Anti-Corruption Summit Could Be ‘Game-Changing’ for Africa” which, as discussed, probably has nothing to do with Africa and everything to do with agenda pushing. The point of said summit is to address “corruption” but not the Clinton Foundation, Soros’s “dark money” funneled through CAP, nor the money Amal’s Uncle Ziad has hidden offshore as noted in the Panama Papers. This more than likely means it will focus on which
areas need invading via the “Responsibility to Protect” to procure resources for the 1% as a “humanitarian” effort. The pattern already exists. In doing so, the push for an “open society” moves forward. Secretary of State John Kerry, who at a commencement speech earlier this week told students to prepare for a “borderless world”, was scheduled to attend as was UK Prime Minister David Cameron, who advocated for Britain to remain in the E.U. and, after meeting Amal, referred to Nasheed as a “friend”. The timing is not coincidental. As the Clooneys arrived in Cannes, Amal with her $3,000 purse and George in jeans and a T-shirt advertising his Casamigos Tequila, the pro open border, pro globalist Soros crew of Clooney’s “humanitarian” Enough Project was in Muslim run London figuring out new ways to manipulate language to facilitate the UN takeover of sovereign nations. Smoke and mirrors.
Once in Cannes, George, usually the center of attention at these types of film festival events, kept a really low profile. The only seemingly staged “spontaneous” pap shots they got were at a restaurant far from the red carpet where he dined not with his friends or his co-stars but with Amal’s relatives and Up in the Air and Money Monster co-producers Daniel Dubiecki and Lara Alameddine with Amal in a $2,000 top and her “ethically mined diamond” on full display.
Then the moment came. Her highness took to the red carpet decked out in a $100K dress, prepared to take the world by storm. She managed to get herself included in the cast photos wearing bright yellow to stand out as everyone was in black. However, true to form, she proved once again a PR fabrication. She tripped going up the steps, needing her man to help her get up and walk to the top, and once again attempted a crotch shot. Classless, tasteless, and certainly detracted from the “UN Hollywood Superpower Couple” the headlines were pre-written to push. Compared to Blake Lively, who showed up not only in the same dress but in a different color, pregnant, and solo, Amal looks the antithesis once again of the strong, independent, feminist her dossier claims to be.
Whether it be the “training exercise” mistaken as a possible ISIS attack outside the Clooneys 5 star hotel or some other issue, they high tailed it out of France the next day and
by all accounts headed back to their newly refurbished $15 million compound in Britain complete with gates and closed circuit television, missing the documentary Risk about Amal’s (former?) client Assange and, of course, Clinton Cash about which George knows a lot. If they fled due to a possible ISIS attack to the walls and security of their mega
mansion, as members of the 1%, that is not to be interpreted as Islamophobia, especially since Amal likes to pull the Muslim card when it suits her. While in England, George headed off to see his friend Richard Kind in his final performance on the West End as Amal
appeared at a Google Zeitgeist event at the Grove Hotel in London with Eric Schmidt from Google. Knowing that the Clooneys believe in “controlling the narrative” and knowing that Google works intimately with the Obama administration to control it’s “narrative”, it is not surprising that Schmidt gave Amal airtime to claim she “beat Cherie Blair” and “won” Nasheed’s case. At one point, Schmidt put her in her place and, great attorney and feminist she claims to be, she capitulated to the patriarchy, sat there and took it.